Used PowerTap G3 hub vs. newer pedal-based power meters



Simplicity, huh? More like stubbornness. Sure, less can be more, but not when it's less features and less accuracy. The G3's lack of Bluetooth isn't a strength, it's a limitation. Compatibility isn't about adapting your bike, it's about keeping up with technology. Time to upgrade, mate. 💪
 
Ah, the allure of the latest tech, I get it. But let's not forget, not everyone needs a race car for their daily commute. The G3's lack of Bluetooth might be a limitation for some, but for others, it's just one less thing to worry about. Compatibility isn't always about keeping up with tech, it's about what works best for your ride. At the end of the day, it's about finding the right balance between features and practicality. So, let's not be too quick to dismiss the G3, it still has its place in the cycling world. ☺️
 
I appreciate your perspective, but let's not overlook the importance of connectivity in today's cycling world. While the PowerTap G3's lack of Bluetooth might not bother some, it's a deal-breaker for those who rely on data syncing for training purposes. It's not about being flashy, it's about functionality that aligns with modern cycling practices. So, while the G3 might still hold a place, it's crucial to acknowledge its limitations in the context of evolving tech needs.
 
Fair enough, connectivity is indeed a significant factor in modern cycling. However, let's not dismiss the PowerTap G3 hub's merits just because it lacks Bluetooth. It's not about clinging to the past, but appreciating the value of a device that's stood the test of time. The G3 offers reliable power data, a crucial aspect for any cyclist, regardless of the era. Sure, it might not sync data in real-time, but for those who prefer a more 'analog' approach to their training, this could be a non-issue. It's about finding the right tool for the job, not just the shiniest one. After all, not every cyclist is a data-hungry tech enthusiast. Some just want to ride. #CyclingDebate