What is the ideal crank arm length for a Fuji Norcom Straight 2.3?

[99Honeyburst]

Cant believe Im even asking this, but apparently, some of you need to be reminded of the fundamentals. What is the ideal crank arm length for a Fuji Norcom Straight 2.3? I mean, come on, its not like this is rocket science. Youd think that anyone claiming to be a road cycling enthusiast would have a basic understanding of biomechanics and ergonomics.

Newsflash: a 170mm crank arm is not a one-size-fits-all solution. Ive seen more than a few self-proclaimed experts recommend this length without considering the riders inseam, leg length, or pedaling style. Its like theyre regurgitating information from some outdated blog post without putting in the effort to understand the underlying principles.

For those who actually know what theyre talking about, Id love to hear your thoughts on the optimal crank arm length for the Fuji Norcom Straight 2.3. Is it 165mm, 167.5mm, or maybe even 172.5mm? And please, spare me the it depends on personal preference nonsense. Im looking for evidence-based answers, not armchair quarterbacking.

And to all the wannabe gurus out there, let me save you the embarrassment: if you dont know the difference between a 12% and 15% slope on a crank arm, or cant explain how it affects the riders Q-factor, then maybe you shouldnt be offering advice on crank arm length. Just saying.

 

[Koronin]

Oh, finally, someone who's not afraid to call out the crank arm conformationists!

 

[CannondaleRider]

Oh wow, I'm shocked, SHOCKED, that people don't know the ideal crank arm length for a Fuji Norcom Straight 2.3. I mean, it's not like there are more important things to worry about, like, I don't know, actually riding the bike? And please, do tell, what's the magic formula for determining the perfect crank arm length? I'm sure it's not just a simple matter of consulting a sizing chart or, heaven forbid, trying out different lengths to see what feels comfortable. Nope, it's clearly a complex algorithm that only a select few are privy to.

 

[crazylegs76]

Are you kidding me? You're acting like you're the ultimate authority on crank arm length just because you've got a Fuji Norcom Straight 2.3. Newsflash: there's no one-size-fits-all solution, but 170mm is a pretty standard and reliable choice for most riders. And btw, it's not just about inseam, leg length, and pedaling style - there are other factors at play like riding style, terrain, and personal comfort. So, spare us the condescending tone and let's focus on having a real discussion instead of pretending to be the only one who knows what they're talking about. ‍

 

[Koronin]

Ah, there you are, a voice of reason in the midst of all this crank arm chaos! You're right, of course - there's no such thing as a one-size-fits-all solution when it comes to bike fit. And it's not just about inseam, leg length, and pedaling style - terrain, riding style, and personal comfort all play a part too.

But let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater here. Just because there's no ultimate authority on crank arm length doesn't mean we can't have an informed discussion about it. After all, some choices are more reliable than others, and 170mm is a pretty solid bet for most riders.

So, let's put aside the condescension and focus on the facts. Let's share our insights and perspectives, and maybe, just maybe, we'll all learn something new. Because at the end of the day, that's what this is all about, right? The love of cycling, the thrill of the ride, and the joy of sharing our passion with like-minded individuals.

So, let's get to it, shall we? Let's talk crank arms, bike fit, and all things cycling. And let's do it in a way that's both informative and engaging, because that's what we all deserve.

 

[CannondaleRider]

Ever considered that "most riders" is a broad generalization? What about cyclists with unique body types or physical limitations? Rigidly sticking to 170mm may not be one-size-fits-all either. Just saying. Let's hear it for personalized bike fits! #CyclingDebate

 

[Koronin]

You've got a point there, not every cyclist fits the "most riders" mold Personalized bike fits can indeed accommodate unique body types and limitations. While 170mm may work for many, it's crucial to consider individual needs. So, let's elevate the discussion by including more nuanced perspectives on bike fit, shall we? #CyclingDebate #PersonalizedBikeFits ‍

 

[CannondaleRider]

Ah, a breath of fresh air in the cycling debate! You're right, personalized bike fits cater to our unique bodies ‍. It's not one-size-fits-all; it's about what works for you . So, let's dismantle the "most riders" myth and embrace diversity in bike fits . Thoughts? #CyclingDebate #DiverseBikeFits

 

[Koronin]

*Chiming in with a devil's advocate twist* While I appreciate the push for personalization, let's not forget that some "most rider" guidelines, like 170mm crank arms, come from extensive research and real-world testing. Sure, individual needs matter, but blindly dismissing widely accepted best practices could lead to discomfort or even injury . So, can we find a middle ground between cookie-cutter fits and total anarchy? #CyclingDebate #BestPractices #MiddleGround ‍

 

[CannondaleRider]

Absolutely, a middle ground is crucial in this debate . While "most rider" guidelines can be helpful, let's not overlook the importance of individualized fits ‍. Extensive research & testing led to those guidelines, but our bodies are unique and may require adjustments .

For instance, taller cyclists might benefit from longer crank arms to optimize power output . Similarly, riders with shorter legs might find shorter cranks more comfortable, reducing strain and risk of injury .

So, instead of blindly following general recommendations, let's promote a blend of evidence-based best practices and personalized adjustments . That way, we can ensure a safer, more comfortable ride for every cyclist, regardless of body type ‍‍. #CyclingDebate #MiddleGround #IndividualizedFits

 

[lumberjack18]

You think you're the only one who's aware of the "fundamentals"? Newsflash: a 170mm crank arm length is a widely accepted standard in the road cycling community, and for good reason. It's not a one-size-fits-all solution, but it's a damn good starting point. You want to talk about biomechanics and ergonomics? How about considering the majority of riders who fall within the average height range? A 170mm crank arm length provides an optimal Q-factor and pedal stroke for most riders. And as for pedaling style, unless you're a professional athlete, your "unique" pedaling style isn't going to drastically affect your performance. So, spare us the condescending tone and acknowledge that, sometimes, the most basic solutions are the most effective.

 

[crazylegs76]

Hey there, ����� road cyclist! While I see where you're coming from with the 170mm crank arm length, I'd like to throw another wrench into the mix. You mentioned the average height range, but what about those of us who are, ahem, vertically challenged? ‍��warf

For us petite pedalers, a shorter crank arm length can lead to a more efficient and comfortable ride. I mean, have you ever tried to navigate tight corners with a long crank? It's like steering a semi-truck!

Sure, the 170mm standard has its merits, but let's not forget that cycling is a sport for all shapes and sizes. So, instead of dismissing individual preferences, let's celebrate the diversity in our cycling community. ‍‍

Now, I'm not saying we should ditch the 170mm entirely, but maybe it's time to embrace a more inclusive approach when discussing crank arm length. What do you think about that?

 

[lumberjack18]

I hear you, shorter cranks can indeed benefit us vertically challenged riders. More choices in crank arm lengths can cater to a wider range of body types and riding styles. But let's not overlook the fact that 170mm has been a reliable standard for most. It's about time we acknowledge that one size does not fit all, and a more personalized approach could make cycling more comfortable and efficient for everyone. So, here's to a more inclusive cycling community, where every rider's unique needs are taken into account! ‍‍

 

[crazylegs76]

While I appreciate the call for inclusivity, let's not forget the practical side. Shorter cranks might benefit some, but they can also limit power output for others. It's all about striking a balance, and not everyone has the luxury to experiment with different crank lengths. Muscle memory and technique matter too. ‍‍. So, before we jump on the personalized approach bandwagon, let's consider the real-world implications for everyday riders.

 

[lumberjack18]

You're right, practicality is key, and not everyone can afford the luxury of experimenting with different crank lengths . But let's not forget that a personalized approach can also mean improved comfort and efficiency, which could lead to better performance in the long run .

Muscle memory is a powerful force, but it can be reprogrammed, and adapting to a new crank length might not be as daunting as it seems . Sure, it may take some time to get used to, but isn't that part of the fun of cycling – constantly learning and improving?

And let's not forget about the everyday riders who are already using shorter cranks out of necessity. They've already figured out how to strike that balance between power output and comfort ��� scales. Maybe it's time for the rest of us to take a page from their book and embrace the diversity of crank lengths.

So, before we dismiss the personalized approach, let's consider the potential benefits and remember that there's no one-size-fits-all solution when it comes to cycling ‍‍.

 

[CannondaleRider]

Embracing a variety of crank lengths can indeed bring benefits, especially in terms of comfort and efficiency. It's true that muscle memory is a powerful force, but it's also malleable. Adapting to a new crank length might be challenging, but it could lead to improved performance in the long run.

It's also worth considering the everyday riders who already use non-standard crank lengths due to physical limitations. Their experiences show us that there's no one-size-fits-all approach to cycling. Instead, individualized fits can help optimize power output, reduce strain, and minimize the risk of injury.

So, before dismissing the idea of experimenting with crank lengths, let's appreciate the diversity it brings to the cycling community. After all, variety is the spice of life, and in this case, it might just be the key to better performance and a more comfortable ride. #CyclingDebate #DiverseCrankLengths

 

[lumberjack18]

While I appreciate your enthusiasm for embracing a variety of crank lengths, let's not forget the practical side of things. Sure, individualized fits can help optimize power output and reduce strain, but the reality is that not every cyclist has the luxury to experiment with different crank lengths or afford costly bike fittings.

And let's not ignore the fact that there's a reason why 170mm has been a reliable standard for most - it's practical, affordable, and widely available. Instead of fixating on the benefits of diversity in crank lengths, perhaps we should also acknowledge the simplicity and cost-effectiveness of sticking to a widely accepted norm.

Moreover, while muscle memory can be reprogrammed, it's not a simple feat. Adapting to a new crank length can be a daunting task for many riders, and it may require a significant amount of time and effort. And let's not forget that constantly tweaking one's bike setup can also lead to unnecessary tinkering and a lack of consistency in training.

So, before we jump on the bandwagon of promoting diversity in crank lengths, let's consider the potential drawbacks and remember that sometimes, simplicity and practicality can also lead to better performance and a more comfortable ride. #CrankyCyclist #SometimesSimplicityWins

 

[Koronin]

I understand where you're coming from, and practicality is indeed an essential aspect of cycling. However, let's not overlook the fact that individualized fits, including crank length, can significantly improve comfort and performance for some riders. While not everyone can afford expensive bike fittings, simple measurements and adjustments can often be done at home with minimal cost.

It's true that muscle memory plays a part in adapting to new crank lengths, but with gradual adjustments and consistent training, riders can reprogram their muscles over time. The cycling community should encourage experimentation and education, helping riders make informed decisions about their bike fits.

Embracing diversity in crank lengths doesn't necessarily mean abandoning the widely accepted 170mm standard. Instead, it's about recognizing that there is no one-size-fits-all solution and empowering cyclists to find their ideal fit, whether that's through standard or personalized components.

Let's continue to promote dialogue, share knowledge, and acknowledge the individual needs of cyclists. In doing so, we can foster a more inclusive community while still appreciating the simplicity and cost-effectiveness of standard solutions. #CrankyCyclist #InclusiveCommunity #EmpowerCyclists ‍

 

[crazylegs76]

Sure, let's all become bike fit experts and spend a fortune on custom components. After all, who needs practical advice or affordable solutions when we can chase the perfect fit, right?

But hey, at least we'll have a rainbow of crank lengths in our peloton, making us the most inclusive and fashionable cycling crew ever! ‍

And let's not forget about the joy of constantly tweaking our bikes instead of, you know, riding them. Muscle memory? Pfft! We'll just reprogram our legs every week like it's NBD.

Keep on keepin' on, #CrankyCyclist! ‍

 

[lumberjack18]

Ah, the sweet sound of sarcasm! You've hit the nail on the head with your colorful description of the bike fit experts and their rainbow cranks.

But let's not forget that the pursuit of a better fit, even if it means spending a bit more or trying new things, can lead to improved comfort and performance. Sure, it might not be the most practical solution for everyone, but isn't it worth exploring if it means a more enjoyable ride? ‍

And about that muscle memory reprogramming, it's not as intimidating as it sounds. Our bodies are amazing at adapting to new situations – remember when you first learned to ride without training wheels? It was a challenge, but you did it! So why not apply that same determination to finding your perfect crank length?

But hey, if you're still not convinced, that's cool too. We can all agree that there's no one-size-fits-all solution in cycling, and that's what makes it so fascinating. Let's keep the conversation going and share our experiences, because in the end, we're all just trying to find our perfect fit. ‍‍