Go Back   Cycling Forums » Bikes » Doping in Cycling
Doping in Cycling Talk about GEAR here













Is it true Lance Armstrong was cheating? - Page 2

Reply
 
LinkBack (2) Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  2 links from elsewhere to this Post. Click to view. #16  
Old 07-28.-2009
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Washington
Age: 50
Posts: 91
Rep Power: 3
Farmguy is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Is it true Lance Armstrong was cheating?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinarellojohn View Post
Pre-cancer LA was at best an average pro cyclist. The transformation after cancer is impossible without some kind of assistance.


I thought he won the World Champ pre-cancer? At 16 wasnt he competing in triathlons against Mark Allen and company? Hardly "average.............
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 07-31.-2009
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Bournemouth, UK
Posts: 44
Rep Power: 0
BomoSammo is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Is it true Lance Armstrong was cheating?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cycler6n View Post
I heard a rumer of it. I hope he wasn't,

What's a rumer ? ? ?
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 07-31.-2009
graywulf's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 50
Rep Power: 1
graywulf is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Is it true Lance Armstrong was cheating?

He lost so much weight without losing power.... was he prescribed HGH during chemo? Was Lance tested when he was off the bike due to cancer?
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 07-31.-2009
limerickman's Avatar
Community Team
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: at the bar
Posts: 13,728
Rep Power: 19
limerickman is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Is it true Lance Armstrong was cheating?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reed Rothchild View Post
He lost maybe 5 pounds at most.
A lot of people could do with losing their baggage.
__________________
.."But finally the last thing I’ll say to the people who don’t believe in cycling, the cynics and the sceptics. I'm sorry for you. I’m sorry that you can’t dream big. [I]I'm sorry you don't believe in miracles. You should believe in these athletes, and you should believe in these people. I'll be a fan of the Tour de France for as long as I live. And there are no secrets - this is a hard sporting event and hard work wins it" - Armstrong 2005 TDF
morelike hypocrisy.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 08-02.-2009
swampy1970's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,145
Rep Power: 4
swampy1970 is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Is it true Lance Armstrong was cheating?

Quote:
Originally Posted by limerickman View Post
A lot of people could do with losing their baggage.
I lost my baggage at Manchester airport once... A perfectly good pair of brancale shoes went to someone in Siberia, or maybe Athens or Madrid....

The Bank of England still has about the same amount of pounds to lose before it goes bankrupt as I do before I get skinny...
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 08-09.-2009
Bro Deal's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Resting by the Tumtum tree
Posts: 6,549
Rep Power: 10
Bro Deal is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Is it true Lance Armstrong was cheating?

Quote:
Originally Posted by hammonjj View Post
Some think he was some don't. Funny thing about those that do think he is a cheat, they have no evidence. They assume because he was as good as he was, that he must have cheated.
Six of Armstrong's urine samples from the 1999 Tour were retrospectively tested and found to contain artificial EPO.

Four people have said that in the 1996 he admitted to using a wide range of doping products.

His personal assistent, Mike Anderson, found steroids in Armstrong's bathroom and helped Armstrong avoid OCC tests.

A team Postal soigneur, Emma O'Reilly, picked up doping products for Armstrong. She also helped him hide injection marks with make up.

Another Postal soigneur listened to Bruyneel brief the team about their hematocrits right before the 1999 Tour. All the riders were just under the 50% rule.

As related by Stephen Swart, in 1995 Motorola's riders made an agreement that everyone on the Tour squad would use EPO. Armstrong was the one that was pushing everyone to do it.

The IM messaging between Andreu and Vaughters show that Armstrong was pushing everyone on Postal to dope. He would tell the riders that everyone does it.

In a phone conversation with Greg Lemond, Armstrong said that using EPO was no big deal and everyone does EPO.

After denying to the press that he had a therapeutic use exemption (TUE) to use any drug in the 1999 Tour, Armstrong tested positive for a corticosteroid. The team, as related by Emma O'Reilly, created a backdated TUE that was accepted by the UCI. Sylvia Shenk, when she was running for president of the UCI, revealed that later in 1999, Armstrong made an under the table payment to the UCI of five hundred thousand dollars.

I could go on and on and on. Saying there is no evidence is either ignorant, naive, or both.
__________________
"You are like the wind and I like the lion. You form the tempest. The sand stings my eyes and the ground is parched. I roar in defiance but you do not hear. But between us there is a difference. I, like the lion, must remain in my place. While you like the wind will never know yours." -- Mulay Hamid El Raisuli, Lord of the Riff, Sultan to the Berbers, Last of the Barbary Pirates
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 08-09.-2009
Cipher's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Minnesota, U.S.A.
Posts: 778
Rep Power: 8
Cipher
Default Re: Is it true Lance Armstrong was cheating?

I have heard your points made prior to this post, but never consolidated at you have done. Personally I would be interested in anything additional you might have to list.



The Truth is out There, and inquiring minds want to know!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bro Deal View Post
Six of Armstrong's urine samples from the 1999 Tour were retrospectively tested and found to contain artificial EPO.

Four people have said that in the 1996 he admitted to using a wide range of doping products.

His personal assistent, Mike Anderson, found steroids in Armstrong's bathroom and helped Armstrong avoid OCC tests.

A team Postal soigneur, Emma O'Reilly, picked up doping products for Armstrong. She also helped him hide injection marks with make up.

Another Postal soigneur listened to Bruyneel brief the team about their hematocrits right before the 1999 Tour. All the riders were just under the 50% rule.

As related by Stephen Swart, in 1995 Motorola's riders made an agreement that everyone on the Tour squad would use EPO. Armstrong was the one that was pushing everyone to do it.

The IM messaging between Andreu and Vaughters show that Armstrong was pushing everyone on Postal to dope. He would tell the riders that everyone does it.

In a phone conversation with Greg Lemond, Armstrong said that using EPO was no big deal and everyone does EPO.

After denying to the press that he had a therapeutic use exemption (TUE) to use any drug in the 1999 Tour, Armstrong tested positive for a corticosteroid. The team, as related by Emma O'Reilly, created a backdated TUE that was accepted by the UCI. Sylvia Shenk, when she was running for president of the UCI, revealed that later in 1999, Armstrong made an under the table payment to the UCI of five hundred thousand dollars.

I could go on and on and on. Saying there is no evidence is either ignorant, naive, or both.
__________________
"The only thing in this world that gives orders, is balls"
~ Ski-U-Ma! ~
"Know your limits... Then FK'N Crush'em!!!"
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 08-09.-2009
Bro Deal's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Resting by the Tumtum tree
Posts: 6,549
Rep Power: 10
Bro Deal is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Is it true Lance Armstrong was cheating?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cipher View Post
Personally I would be interested in anything additional you might have to list.
This is just the stuff around the 1999 EPO positives:

1) The samples were tested anonymously. The lab had no knowledge of who each sample belonged to. I will defer to Ashenden on the validity of the testing procedure.

2) The identity of the samples' owners was only known by the UCI. The lab had no access to the doping forms then and they still do not.

3) Armstrong's samples were identified a long time after the testing was completed by a journalist who obtained Armstrong's doping forms from the UCI with Armstrong's permission.

4) Six of the positive samples turned out to be Armstrong's.

5) The pattern of the tested samples matches what would be expected as a rider injects EPO and the over the course of a few days it becomes harder to detect.

6) Armstrong was recently offered the chance to have the samples retested, including a DNA test to show that they were really his. He refused.

7) Postal's soigneur Emma O'Reilly was asked by Armstrong to dispose of syringes and other doping paraphernalia before the 1999 Tour de France. She also delivered drugs to Armstrong.

8) O'Reilly helped Armstrong cover up injection marks with make-up.

9) Another Postal soigneur, Ron Jongen, listened to Johan Bruyneel talking on the eve of the 1999 Tour de France about how all the riders' hematocrits were just under the 50% limit.

9) The chance of a person in the general population being at or near a 50% hematocrit is roughly 2%. Trained endurance athletes have an even smaller chance of being at 50%. Take 2/100 and raise it to the ninth power. The chance of nine riders having Hcts near 50% is close to the chance of winning the lottery.

10) On team Motorola, Armstrong encouraged his teammates to use EPO. He entered into an agreement with the other riders that all riders on the 1995 Tour de France squad would use EPO.

11) Armstrong encouraged members of Postal, like Andreu and Vaughters, to dope. He told his teammates that it was normal and everyone else was doing it.

12) When Armstrong joined Postal, he brought on board Johan Bruyneel, a man who was nicknamed the Hog because of the vast quantities of drugs he consumed while on team ONCE.

13) Team ONCE had a teamwide doping program since before 1998.

14) Dr. Prentice Steffan, who had refused to help Tyler Hamilton and Marty Jemisen dope, was removed from Team Postal.

15) Bruyneel brought doctors from Team Once to replace Steffan.

16) Armstrong had a long term relationship with Dr. Ferrari, an expert in the use of EPO.

17) Armstrong kept his relationship secret. It was only discovered when an Italian police investigation of Ferrari revealed that Armstrong was periodically travelling to Italy to see Dr. Ferrari.

18) When the rider Simeoni testified that Dr. Ferrari had helped him dope, Armstrong maintained the peloton's policy of omerta by punishing Simeoni during a race.

19) After he prevented Simeoni from being included in a break, Armstrong was seen to make a "zip the lips" gesture to other riders. Armstrong's teammates spit on Simeoni as he rolled past.

20) In a phone call to Greg Lemond about the revelations that he had been seeing Dr. Ferrari, Armstrong said that using EPO was no big deal and everyone did it.

21) In the 1999 Tour de France, Armstrong told Christophe Bassons, who was revealed to be the one clean athlete on Team Festina and had been speaking out about doping, to stop talking about doping. He encouraged Bassons to leave the sport.

22) As a way to explain his sudden rise, Armstrong constructed and maintained a lie that he had lost large amounts of weight. This was shown to be untrue during the SCA case.
__________________
"You are like the wind and I like the lion. You form the tempest. The sand stings my eyes and the ground is parched. I roar in defiance but you do not hear. But between us there is a difference. I, like the lion, must remain in my place. While you like the wind will never know yours." -- Mulay Hamid El Raisuli, Lord of the Riff, Sultan to the Berbers, Last of the Barbary Pirates
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 08-10.-2009
slyjackson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bryans Road Maryland
Posts: 136
Rep Power: 3
slyjackson is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Is it true Lance Armstrong was cheating?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bro Deal View Post
Six of Armstrong's urine samples from the 1999 Tour were retrospectively tested and found to contain artificial EPO.

Four people have said that in the 1996 he admitted to using a wide range of doping products.

His personal assistent, Mike Anderson, found steroids in Armstrong's bathroom and helped Armstrong avoid OCC tests.

A team Postal soigneur, Emma O'Reilly, picked up doping products for Armstrong. She also helped him hide injection marks with make up.

Another Postal soigneur listened to Bruyneel brief the team about their hematocrits right before the 1999 Tour. All the riders were just under the 50% rule.

As related by Stephen Swart, in 1995 Motorola's riders made an agreement that everyone on the Tour squad would use EPO. Armstrong was the one that was pushing everyone to do it.

The IM messaging between Andreu and Vaughters show that Armstrong was pushing everyone on Postal to dope. He would tell the riders that everyone does it.

In a phone conversation with Greg Lemond, Armstrong said that using EPO was no big deal and everyone does EPO.

After denying to the press that he had a therapeutic use exemption (TUE) to use any drug in the 1999 Tour, Armstrong tested positive for a corticosteroid. The team, as related by Emma O'Reilly, created a backdated TUE that was accepted by the UCI. Sylvia Shenk, when she was running for president of the UCI, revealed that later in 1999, Armstrong made an under the table payment to the UCI of five hundred thousand dollars.

I could go on and on and on. Saying there is no evidence is either ignorant, naive, or both.

This is just the stuff around the 1999 EPO positives:

1) The samples were tested anonymously. The lab had no knowledge of who each sample belonged to. I will defer to Ashenden on the validity of the testing procedure.

2) The identity of the samples' owners was only known by the UCI. The lab had no access to the doping forms then and they still do not.

3) Armstrong's samples were identified a long time after the testing was completed by a journalist who obtained Armstrong's doping forms from the UCI with Armstrong's permission.

4) Six of the positive samples turned out to be Armstrong's.

5) The pattern of the tested samples matches what would be expected as a rider injects EPO and the over the course of a few days it becomes harder to detect.

6) Armstrong was recently offered the chance to have the samples retested, including a DNA test to show that they were really his. He refused.

7) Postal's soigneur Emma O'Reilly was asked by Armstrong to dispose of syringes and other doping paraphernalia before the 1999 Tour de France. She also delivered drugs to Armstrong.

8) O'Reilly helped Armstrong cover up injection marks with make-up.

9) Another Postal soigneur, Ron Jongen, listened to Johan Bruyneel talking on the eve of the 1999 Tour de France about how all the riders' hematocrits were just under the 50% limit.

9) The chance of a person in the general population being at or near a 50% hematocrit is roughly 2%. Trained endurance athletes have an even smaller chance of being at 50%. Take 2/100 and raise it to the ninth power. The chance of nine riders having Hcts near 50% is close to the chance of winning the lottery.

10) On team Motorola, Armstrong encouraged his teammates to use EPO. He entered into an agreement with the other riders that all riders on the 1995 Tour de France squad would use EPO.

11) Armstrong encouraged members of Postal, like Andreu and Vaughters, to dope. He told his teammates that it was normal and everyone else was doing it.

12) When Armstrong joined Postal, he brought on board Johan Bruyneel, a man who was nicknamed the Hog because of the vast quantities of drugs he consumed while on team ONCE.

13) Team ONCE had a teamwide doping program since before 1998.

14) Dr. Prentice Steffan, who had refused to help Tyler Hamilton and Marty Jemisen dope, was removed from Team Postal.

15) Bruyneel brought doctors from Team Once to replace Steffan.

16) Armstrong had a long term relationship with Dr. Ferrari, an expert in the use of EPO.

17) Armstrong kept his relationship secret. It was only discovered when an Italian police investigation of Ferrari revealed that Armstrong was periodically travelling to Italy to see Dr. Ferrari.

18) When the rider Simeoni testified that Dr. Ferrari had helped him dope, Armstrong maintained the peloton's policy of omerta by punishing Simeoni during a race.

19) After he prevented Simeoni from being included in a break, Armstrong was seen to make a "zip the lips" gesture to other riders. Armstrong's teammates spit on Simeoni as he rolled past.

20) In a phone call to Greg Lemond about the revelations that he had been seeing Dr. Ferrari, Armstrong said that using EPO was no big deal and everyone did it.

21) In the 1999 Tour de France, Armstrong told Christophe Bassons, who was revealed to be the one clean athlete on Team Festina and had been speaking out about doping, to stop talking about doping. He encouraged Bassons to leave the sport.

22) As a way to explain his sudden rise, Armstrong constructed and maintained a lie that he had lost large amounts of weight. This was shown to be untrue during the SCA case.
I guess you could go on since you are spreading "Internet Rumors" and nothing more. You have absolutely nothing to back up this garbage you have just posted. If any of this crap was true, the french would be all over it...If I were Lance, I would track you down and and have your rumor spreading ass in court and sue you for everything you have.. People like you are disgusting.
__________________
Scott CR1 Pro
Garmin Edge 305 HR+CAD, Shimano Ultegra-6600 shifters, 10sp 12-27 cassette, Shimano Ultegra-6600 front & Rear Derailleur, Shimano Ultegra-6600 38/52 Crank, Shimano Ultegra brakes,Fortezza SuperLite Road tires, Mavic Ksyrium Elite wheels, Crank Brothers "Quattro'" pedals, Selle Italia SLR Saddle, FSA K-Wing Pro OS Road bars, Samsung YP-U2J MP3 player
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 08-10.-2009
Bro Deal's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Resting by the Tumtum tree
Posts: 6,549
Rep Power: 10
Bro Deal is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Is it true Lance Armstrong was cheating?

Quote:
Originally Posted by slyjackson View Post
I guess you could go on since you are spreading "Internet Rumors" and nothing more. You have absolutely nothing to back up this garbage you have just posted. If any of this crap was true, the french would be all over it...If I were Lance, I would track you down and and have your rumor spreading ass in court and sue you for everything you have.. People like you are disgusting.
Sorry, sniffer, but it is not rumor. Most of it is taken from depositions. It is very easy to find any of the information I posted. It is detailed in many places, inlcuding books and newspaper articles. If you want to know what Armstrong's own teammates think about Armstrong and his doping then look up the transcript of the internet messaging converstion between Vaughters and Andreu.

Truth is not disgusting, and the truth is that Armstrong is a doper. The evidence is overwhelming. You would have to be a moron not to conclude that Armstrong doped.

Here's someone else for Armstrong to sue for telling the truth. In this interview, Michael Ashenden, one of the developers of the test for EPO, talks about Armstrong's six positives and concludes that Armstrong doped. Read it and weep.

Michael Ashenden | Velocity Nation - Bike racing culture, news and events

Dr. Ashenden says,

"There is no doubt in my mind these samples contain synthetic EPO, they belong to Lance Armstrong, and there's no conceivable way that I can see that a lab could've spiked them in a way that the data has presented itself. So there is no doubt in my mind he took EPO during the '99 Tour."
__________________
"You are like the wind and I like the lion. You form the tempest. The sand stings my eyes and the ground is parched. I roar in defiance but you do not hear. But between us there is a difference. I, like the lion, must remain in my place. While you like the wind will never know yours." -- Mulay Hamid El Raisuli, Lord of the Riff, Sultan to the Berbers, Last of the Barbary Pirates

Last edited by Bro Deal; 08-10.-2009 at 10:48 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 08-10.-2009
slyjackson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bryans Road Maryland
Posts: 136
Rep Power: 3
slyjackson is on a distinguished road
Cool Re: Is it true Lance Armstrong was cheating?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bro Deal View Post
Sorry, sniffer, but it is not rumor. Most of it is taken from depositions. It is very easy to find any of the information I posted. It is detailed in many places, inlcuding books and newspaper articles. If you want to know what Armstrong's own teammates think about Armstrong and his doping then look up the transcript of the internet messaging converstion between Vaughters and Andreu.

Truth is not disgusting, and the truth is that Armstrong is a doper. The evidence is overwhelming. You would have to be a moron not to conclude that Armstrong doped.

Here's someone else for Armstrong to sue for telling the truth. In this interview, Michael Ashenden, one of the developers of the test for EPO, talks about Armstrong's six positives and concludes that Armstrong doped. Read it and weep.

Michael Ashenden | Velocity Nation - Bike racing culture, news and events

Dr. Ashenden says,

"There is no doubt in my mind these samples contain synthetic EPO, they belong to Lance Armstrong, and there's no conceivable way that I can see that a lab could've spiked them in a way that the data has presented itself. So there is no doubt in my mind he took EPO during the '99 Tour."
So you basing your information on a website and calling it fact? is that all you got to base this on? I thought that you may have worked in the "piss" lab or something.
Do you realize that if only one third of the stuff you posted was true then Lance would have been stripped of his titles years ago. Looks like you may be the sniffer, but I'm not sure whos butt you are sniffing though.

My original post to you still stands....
__________________
Scott CR1 Pro
Garmin Edge 305 HR+CAD, Shimano Ultegra-6600 shifters, 10sp 12-27 cassette, Shimano Ultegra-6600 front & Rear Derailleur, Shimano Ultegra-6600 38/52 Crank, Shimano Ultegra brakes,Fortezza SuperLite Road tires, Mavic Ksyrium Elite wheels, Crank Brothers "Quattro'" pedals, Selle Italia SLR Saddle, FSA K-Wing Pro OS Road bars, Samsung YP-U2J MP3 player
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 08-10.-2009
Bro Deal's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Resting by the Tumtum tree
Posts: 6,549
Rep Power: 10
Bro Deal is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Is it true Lance Armstrong was cheating?

Quote:
Originally Posted by slyjackson View Post
S Do you realize that if only one third of the stuff you posted was true then Lance would have been stripped of his titles years ago. Looks like you may be the sniffer, but I'm not sure whos butt you are sniffing though.
That's your argument?? If he was doping then he would have been stripped. LOL. Get back to me when you have some facts. Right now it is obvious that you have nothing. Dispute anything that I wrote. Come on, smart guy. Let's see it. Dispute any of the points I made. Saddle sniffers are always the same. Ignorant and stupid. Not a winning combination.

Everything I wrote is the truth. A trivial amount of research can show this.

Sorry if your idol is a fraud. There is also no Santa Claus.
__________________
"You are like the wind and I like the lion. You form the tempest. The sand stings my eyes and the ground is parched. I roar in defiance but you do not hear. But between us there is a difference. I, like the lion, must remain in my place. While you like the wind will never know yours." -- Mulay Hamid El Raisuli, Lord of the Riff, Sultan to the Berbers, Last of the Barbary Pirates
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 08-10.-2009
jhuskey's Avatar
Community Team
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Great Smoky Mountains, TN USA
Posts: 7,085
Rep Power: 14
jhuskey is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Is it true Lance Armstrong was cheating?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bro Deal View Post
That's your argument?? If he was doping then he would have been stripped. LOL. Get back to me when you have some facts. Right now it is obvious that you have nothing. Dispute anything that I wrote. Come on, smart guy. Let's see it. Dispute any of the points I made. Saddle sniffers are always the same. Ignorant and stupid. Not a winning combination.

Everything I wrote is the truth. A trivial amount of research can show this.

Sorry if your idol is a fraud. There is also no Santa Claus.


What? What kind of cruel propaganda are you spreading? I don't know what you mean, there is no Santa Clause"!
__________________
Dope,when training and talent just aren't enough.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 08-10.-2009
slyjackson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bryans Road Maryland
Posts: 136
Rep Power: 3
slyjackson is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Is it true Lance Armstrong was cheating?

[quote=Bro Deal;3901983]That's your argument?? If he was doping then he would have been stripped. LOL. Get back to me when you have some facts. Right now it is obvious that you have nothing. Dispute anything that I wrote. Come on, smart guy. Let's see it. Dispute any of the points I made. Saddle sniffers are always the same. Ignorant and stupid. Not a winning combination.

Everything I wrote is the truth. A trivial amount of research can show this.

Sorry if your idol is a fraud. There is also no Santa Claus.[/quote]

So once again, all your facts only come from the internet and not the actually lab that done these so call tests? Oh....I forgot you dont have access to the labs reports or the labs that performed the actual tests, just the teenage girl internet gossip sites.......

If you were not in the lab that done the tests at the time of these tests, then you don't have a clue about what you are posting here- Period. You are only blabbing speculations, gossip and nonsense and nothing more.

A "house plant" has more common sense than what you appear to have on this subject.....

My original post to you still stands....
__________________
Scott CR1 Pro
Garmin Edge 305 HR+CAD, Shimano Ultegra-6600 shifters, 10sp 12-27 cassette, Shimano Ultegra-6600 front & Rear Derailleur, Shimano Ultegra-6600 38/52 Crank, Shimano Ultegra brakes,Fortezza SuperLite Road tires, Mavic Ksyrium Elite wheels, Crank Brothers "Quattro'" pedals, Selle Italia SLR Saddle, FSA K-Wing Pro OS Road bars, Samsung YP-U2J MP3 player
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 08-10.-2009
swampy1970's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,145
Rep Power: 4
swampy1970 is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Is it true Lance Armstrong was cheating?

Quote:
Originally Posted by slyjackson View Post
So you basing your information on a website and calling it fact? is that all you got to base this on? I thought that you may have worked in the "piss" lab or something.
Do you realize that if only one third of the stuff you posted was true then Lance would have been stripped of his titles years ago. Looks like you may be the sniffer, but I'm not sure whos butt you are sniffing though.

My original post to you still stands....
Statute of limitations... Samples were only supposed to be kept for 5 years for the purpose of possibly retesting. For some reason they were kept longer and 'someone' decided' after the expiration date to test.

Of course will all the rumors throughout the years those samples could have been tested between 2001 and 2004 and the results would have been valid...

... but why let valid work get in the way of a good story?

Besides, are the labs really 'that' good? From a scientific source slightly more repected that L'Equipe...

Testing for Recombinant Human Erythropoietin in Urine: Problems Associated with Current Anti-Doping Testing. Journal of Applied Physiology
The Validity Of Epo Testing For Athletes

ScienceDaily (June 28, 2008) — Recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEpo) is a genetically engineered hormone sometimes misused by high-performance athletes such as cyclists and marathon runners to boost their endurance. The potential misuse of the drug is detected in urine collected from athletes.
Since the test was introduced in 2000, 33 labs around the world have been accredited by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) to administer the procedure. During the last few years, the testing procedure has been criticized by some. Accordingly, a team of researchers investigated the quality of the test results at two WADA labs. They found that the detection power of the test at the two labs was poor.
The Study
The researchers conducted the study using eight male volunteers (non-athletes). Following baseline measurements, the volunteers were injected every second day for 14 days with 5,000 IU rHuEpo (the "boosting period"). For the next two weeks, the volunteers received one injection every seven days (the "maintenance" period). Blood samples were drawn before the injections and on eight additional occasions. Urine samples were collected before the blood draws and on six additional days. Exercise tests using a bicycle ergometer were conducted prior to injection and on three other occasions.

Findings and Implications
The rHuEpo administration regimen was effective in increasing the oxygen carrying capacity of all the volunteer subjects, and at the same time, their performance increased. Additionally:
  • Using the samples collected during the boosting phase, Lab A concluded that all the samples were positive for rHuEpo. Lab B determined that none of the samples, despite being identical to Lab A's samples, were positive.
  • For samples collected during the maintenance period, Lab A determined that six of l6 samples were positive and two samples were suspicious. By contrast, Lab B found no positive samples.
  • For samples collected during the post-treatment phase, Lab A concluded that two of 24 samples were positive and three were suspicious. Lab B determined that all 24 samples were negative.
The implication-- if applied to athletes -- is that there is only a small "risk" of being tested positive for rHuEpo doping while athletic performance is greatly enhanced. If the samples are analyzed by Lab B, the risk of doping detection is non-existent. It should be noted that in this study, the "maintenance" period was only two weeks -- but according to the authors, this can be sustained for an entire sporting season.
Results in Perspective
The results demonstrate that the detection power of the WADA test is poor and that agreement in analytical results from two WADA-accredited laboratories is very poor. Given these and other findings, the researchers conclude that improvements in the current rHuEpo test are necessary, or that alternative tests should be developed. This however, seems unlikely to occur before major events scheduled for 2008 like the Tour de France or the Olympic Games in Beijing.
Accompanying Editorial
As the topic of drug testing athletes is especially timely and carries implications for anti-doping efforts and public policy, the Journal invited and published an editorial that accompanies the study. Joris R. Delanghe of Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium and Michael J. Joyner of the Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, wrote that the physiological background for testing Epo in urine is complex and the handling of Epo by the renal tubules is poorly understood. The high number of false negative results found in the study implies a risk that athletes who use rHuEpo will avoid detection and damage the fundamental goal of fair competition.
The editorial authors suggest that while the existing test can likely be improved by emphasizing pre-analytical care of urine specimens, there may be limitations to urine testing of peptide hormones that will be difficult to ever overcome. Additionally, there is also a concern that treated urine specimens could mask rHuEpo abuse. As a result, the authors suggest that blood-based indirect rHuEpo tests may offer greater advantages for detecting the drug, and this approach would also be useful for detecting other kinds of blood doping.


The Validity Of Epo Testing For Athletes
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
armstrong, cheating, lance, true

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.cyclingforums.com/doping-cycling/380533-true-lance-armstrong-cheating.html
Posted By For Type Date
Gert Steegmans - Page 4 - CyclingNews Forum This thread Refback 09-03.-2009 09:36 AM
Armstrong + UCI + Cancer - Page 3 - CyclingNews Forum This thread Refback 08-21.-2009 07:39 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:35 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com

Translations (powered by Google):
Bulgarian Croatian Czech Danish Dutch English Finnish French German Italian Japanese Korean Norwegian Polish Portuguese Spanish Swedish