![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kansas City, USA
Posts: 3,560
|
I scored my first win today on the first race of the season. I know that a Cat 5 win in early March is probably nothing to crow about, so I'll be brief. It was a 20 mile RR, which consisted of 4 laps around a 5-mile circuit. There was a strong crosswind on one portion, but it was flat except for a .5 mile hill up to the finish line on each lap.
I was pretty surprised to see how much the field stretched out the first time up the climb. No one was really pushing the pace (IMO), but the pack got single file and took a while to group back up on the subsequent downhill. Based on that, I decided to just sit in near the front rather than trying to attack, and wait for the field to self-destruct. The 2nd time up, gaps were forming and I was attentive to any groups forming on the front to press their advantage -- that didn't happen, they just recovered and let the pack catch back up. I was nowhere near my max on the climbs, so I decided there was no reason to try a breakaway: I could probably just win it on the last climb. The third time up, only three of us crested the hill together at the front. I stayed near the front on the last lap and finished ~10 seconds ahead of 2nd on the final climb. First win - Yay! What did surprise me was that upon reviewing the PT data, the ride was 55 min at a NP of 283. It seemed a lot easier than that while I was sitting in for most of the race. It's still well below my FT, but probably above FT for many of the others and that's what must have eventually done them in (especially if they were having to chase back up after the climb each lap). 35 y/o, 77.2kg, 4 climbs ~2 min each @ 394w, 378w, 417w, 475w AP. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 15
|
Great job! I would be happy just not to be dropped at this point so thinking about winning feels so far off.
475w for 2 minutes! Hmm I better get crackin. Again great job and I see more victories in your future. Alex |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 418
|
That's nice. Wondering how RD did in his first race of the season. For me 3/4 combined field 18 miles 3 laps in Central Park, my fitness was matched by a strong showing of cat3 and cat4. Rumors have it that the winner of the cat4 Green Mountain stage race was at the front. I did 2 attacks and amazed how much power I was actually able to output. Unfortunately, some of these guys made the pace pretty quick and my attacks were all shut down. Not much of another counters, surprisiningly. I was bummed in the end beause I wasn't willing to finish the race due to latic acid was burning in my quads and only had 4 hours of sleep. After looking at my power data, I realized I wasn't getting any slower but the pace of the race was just fast enough. It was good l5/l6 workout for me though. There were about 9 rollers each lap followd by a .25 miles hill. Everytime, my power output is at 150%+ of my FT. Definately, some 30`/30` intervals are in order.
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 4,115
|
Cool.
Congrats. Guess those winter trainer hours paid off. I'll be interested to see the match analysis. Your only matches may have been the climbs. I'm guessing ~3-4 matches per climb. What was your peak NP? |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,234
|
I am very happy with your results. Such a kind and passionate guy. You deserved the result that you got. Many congrats.
Yes I think that you're getting a lot of inspiration and motivation from your mastery over power training. In that sens, I'd agree that your powermeter has been helping you a lot in becoming a better rider. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 100
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kansas City, USA
Posts: 3,560
|
Quote:
17.7 matches total, and the NP peak occurred at the race finish - 283w. I had some trouble with the macros and charting in Excel, so I may need some more help there. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kansas City, USA
Posts: 3,560
|
Quote:
Thanks all. Now if I can just figure out how to hold the 6 w/kg for another 58 minutes I'll be set for the TdF. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 383
|
Congrats frenchyge! How do I pronounce that anyway?
Just as an aside, something to consider... I know you are probably partly serious and partly facetious when you credit power-tap with your victory. I'd like you to consider though that many guys pick up a power-tap or SRM's and literally don't improve at all. It takes the human part of 'the equation' to make the technology work. I think that's where the real credit lies. Congrats again. And, as has been said, with those numbers and your obviously astute eye for reading the race -- which, again, can't be displayed on a power-tap -- I suspect you will be winning again soon.
__________________
It takes a big man to cry, but it takes a bigger man to laugh at that man. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | ||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kansas City, USA
Posts: 3,560
|
Quote:
It's Frenchy, with my initials after it. Name's Greg French. No, I'm not French. Quote:
There's no doubt that all those hours on the trainer, and helpful advice from forum members deserve most of the credit for this race. The PT's role was mostly motivational in this case, which is still saying a lot considering how much effort I was able to put into the trainer this winter. I'm expecting it'll pull its weight and then some on the TT's later this year, though. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: northern, mexico - texas
Posts: 170
|
Quote:
would that be the perry lake RR? nice! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: AZ
Posts: 863
|
Congrats French! that is what i like about races with up hill finish, the strongest man wins not the luckiest.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 135
|
Nice job Greg, keep up the good (and hard) work! (Man, I'm so far behind in my forum reading...)
Berend |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 188
|
Quote:
Congrats! That's awsome! I'm curious as to how the 475w measures as a percentage of your FT, if you don't mind my asking. Do you think that having the powertap during the race actually helped you win? (ie; confidence in knowing exactly how much more you could give, etc.) Do you think you would still have won without it? (ie; tentative in not knowing exactly what you were putting out at any given time). Anyway, congratulations and keep doing what you're doing! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kansas City, USA
Posts: 3,560
|
Quote:
Honestly, I may have glanced at the PT once or twice during the whole ride, and never on the hill -- it didn't do anything for me *during* the race. I sat-in for the whole race and just paced with the leading few on the climbs, never pushing hard until the last kick. All 4 of the climbs were well over 120%FT (ie, L6) and the 475w was averaged over 2 minutes. The final kick to the finish, where I dropped the last rider, was ~25 seconds at an average of 640w. |
|
|
|
|