S
stonej
Guest
dkahn400 wrote:
> Paul Boyd wrote:
>
> > Can they really not see for themselves the nonsense that they have just created?
>
> In cases like this it is inconceivable that it's accidental. Creating
> cycle farcilities enables anti-cycling officials to strike a blow
> against cyclists while pretending to do the opposite.
>
> --
> Dave...
No holy book of any kind is used for swearing in members of congress,
they simply
raise their right arm and take some kind of pledge.
This whole "controversy" is just manufactured hysteria from people who
want to stir
things up.
Ever wonder why there has not been a controversy about Jewish members
of congress
not wanting to use the bible in their oath? Very simple, it was never
required in the
first place.
> Paul Boyd wrote:
>
> > Can they really not see for themselves the nonsense that they have just created?
>
> In cases like this it is inconceivable that it's accidental. Creating
> cycle farcilities enables anti-cycling officials to strike a blow
> against cyclists while pretending to do the opposite.
>
> --
> Dave...
No holy book of any kind is used for swearing in members of congress,
they simply
raise their right arm and take some kind of pledge.
This whole "controversy" is just manufactured hysteria from people who
want to stir
things up.
Ever wonder why there has not been a controversy about Jewish members
of congress
not wanting to use the bible in their oath? Very simple, it was never
required in the
first place.