probably better since the replacement cost in the event of a crash is less. I've been racing crits for the past 4 years in Colorado and I see alot of aluminum or aluminum/carbon stay frames. of course many choose carbon or their team has a frame sponsor that provides carbon frames.Jcyclist said:Is aluminum better for racing crits
That ends up quite ironic. You have your expensive race bike which you train on, and your cheaper training bike which you race on.gregkeller said:I like aluminum for crits, stiff, and cheap. I've been racing for two full seasons now, and only crashed once while racing. Nothing happened to the frame, and it wasn't a major crash. But Crits are fast, and tight and people go down. I find most people don't race on a top of the line bike if they do crits, something made of aluminum and a 105/ultegra (or campy equivalent) mix gets the job done and is replaceable if it gets banged up. Save the carbon or expensive ti bike for training.
bobbyOCR said:That ends up quite ironic. You have your expensive race bike which you train on, and your cheaper training bike which you race on.
bobbyOCR said:That ends up quite ironic. You have your expensive race bike which you train on, and your cheaper training bike which you race on.
I race and train on steel, but it's not an old lugged frame from the 80's but a rather stiff and light dedacciai 16.5 OEM model. I have an older aluminum bike that's my bad weather trainer, but the steel model is just as fast (faster actually). One factor with crits (which are the majority of my races), is you don't pay a weight penalty. Make sure the wheels, bars and stem are rock solid and stay away from the true weightweenie stuff. Steel is fairly repairable as well just in case (knock knock..).Jcyclist said:Is aluminum better for racing crits
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.