Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Tube size - best option?

Started by dabac · · Last activity · 5 posts · 1,247 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
2 September 2004
Last activity
4 September 2004
Original author
dabac
Posts
5
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,247
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–5 of 5
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Hi guys,

    I've got an old (apparently roadster-style) bicycle that needs new tires and tubes. Tire size according to the old ones is 27 1 1/2 (40x609). The most easily accessible LBS sells a combination tube for the sizes 27-28 (32x622-44x635).
    Now I've occasionally come across bikes that have given a bumpy ride because the tube have actually been folded double somewhere in the tyre, so I'm a bit wary about using a tube that potentially could be too long. Would I be able to/better off using a standard 26" or MTB 26" tube instead? (584/559 mm)

  2. dabac said:

    Hi guys,

    I've got an old (apparently roadster-style) bicycle that needs new tires and tubes. Tire size according to the old ones is 27 1 1/2 (40x609). The most easily accessible LBS sells a combination tube for the sizes 27-28 (32x622-44x635).
    Now I've occasionally come across bikes that have given a bumpy ride because the tube have actually been folded double somewhere in the tyre, so I'm a bit wary about using a tube that potentially could be too long. Would I be able to/better off using a standard 26" or MTB 26" tube instead? (584/559 mm)


    Well, 27" is ISO 630 mm, and SHeldon Brown doesn't list other sizes for 27", nor anything that goes with 609 mm. I would suggest that you double check the tire, or that you compare the rim with a 700c rim (ISO 622 mm), which should have a larger diametre by 8 mm.

    Normally tubes are the same for 700c and 27", so go for 700x30-40 if you want a lightweight tube, or 700x35-45 if you want a beefier one. The tire will be different. I don't remember seeing 27 x 1 1/2" in our LBSs, but that size wouldn't fit on my bike anyway. OTOH, I haven't seen your rim, but 27 x 1 3/8" would fit the same rim without problems (if that wheel is 630 mm). OTOH, you can't fit a 700c tire on a 27" wheel.

  3. dabac said:

    Hi guys,

    I've got an old (apparently roadster-style) bicycle that needs new tires and tubes. Tire size according to the old ones is 27 1 1/2 (40x609). The most easily accessible LBS sells a combination tube for the sizes 27-28 (32x622-44x635).
    Now I've occasionally come across bikes that have given a bumpy ride because the tube have actually been folded double somewhere in the tyre, so I'm a bit wary about using a tube that potentially could be too long. Would I be able to/better off using a standard 26" or MTB 26" tube instead? (584/559 mm)


    Continental specifies their touring tubes as 609-642 (28/37 slim or 32/47 all)
    see:
    conti-online.comtour en.html
    but I have only rarely seen them.

    I also would recommend going for the 700c sizing, as mgagnonlv stated, over the 26-inch tubes. Shouldn't be a problem.

  4. mgagnonlv said:

    I would suggest that you double check the tire,

    The tire is definitely a 40x609.

  5. serenaslu said:


    I also would recommend going for the 700c sizing, as mgagnonlv stated, over the 26-inch tubes. Shouldn't be a problem.

    I bought the 27-28 combo tube and fitted them. They were a tight fit on my wheels, so it'll probably be OK.

    Thanks for digging up the conti data though.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.