CyclingForums
A community for cyclists, gear, training and racing.
Recumbent bicycles · Public discussion
This thread is locked and is currently read-only.
Thread details
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
I just looked at the M5 link via John Riley and got a bit confused (Re: recumbent mono-blade fork
thread). I am aware of the 26 inch and the 700c size and the Bontrager 29 and the Monster 36 inch
size....but a 28 inch?? Anyone know if the M5 28 inch is a 700c size or is there now a 28 inch?
I also wondered if anyone here has thought about using the 36 inch size wheels yet? I can see
the speed advantage of a 36, but cannot see too many bents able to take a 36 inch without major
frame surgery.
28" is a 700 Dan Kluckhuhn
"Joshua Goldberg" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...
[q1]> I just looked at the M5 link via John Riley and got a bit confused (Re: recumbent mono-blade fork[/q1]
[q1]> thread). I am aware of the 26 inch and the 700c size and the Bontrager 29 and the Monster 36 inch[/q1]
[q1]> size....but a 28 inch?? Anyone know if the M5 28 inch is a 700c size or is there now a 28 inch?[/q1]
[q1]>[/q1]
[q1]> I also wondered if anyone here has thought about using the 36 inch size wheels yet? I can see the[/q1]
[q1]> speed advantage of a 36, but cannot see too many bents able to take a 36 inch without major frame[/q1]
[q1]> surgery.[/q1]
Active in the last 60 minutes
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.