Hope you treat this with light hearted humour and No, Mr Saunders, I wasn't picking on you, it just seemed you got into all the pics!
Jhimmy.
P.S Don't try to explore my website as its [censored]!
Forgot to say - are most of you unmarried or otherwise ill-advised on the hat front? The hat suits Phil, but the other hatted people need to take advice.
Hope you treat this with light hearted humour and No, Mr Saunders, I wasn't picking on you, it just seemed you got into all the pics!
Jhimmy.
P.S Don't try to explore my website as its [censored]!
Forgot to say - are most of you unmarried or otherwise ill-advised on the hat front? The hat suits Phil, but the other hatted people need to take advice.
That's me without the hat - because, of course, I excel in the sartorial area.
-- Martin Richardson 239/284 Munros - 15% to go 34/34 'Furths' & 439/439 Nuttalls - 0% to go 42/89 Donalds - 53% to go 0/? Himalayans - 100% to go 442/1552 Marilyns - 72% to go
Forgot to say - are most of you unmarried or otherwise ill-advised on the hat front? The hat suits Phil, but the other hatted people need to take advice.
We're going to a "Gangsters and Molls" dance on Tuesday, were there any suitable hats there Paul?.
I think Roger is boxing his compass, but there is something very odd about Paul. He is standing at a distinct lean, compared with the others, was the camera held straight? -- Gordon
Forgot to say - are most of you unmarried or otherwise ill-advised on the hat front? The hat suits Phil,
that was one of six (yes s i x) hats I had with me on the expedition, seven if you count the midge net. My favourite is the Akubra, which protects equally from sun and rain but falls down in the resistance to high winds and packability fronts. -- Phil Cook looking north over the park to the "Westminster Gasworks"
Hope you treat this with light hearted humour and No, Mr Saunders, I wasn't picking on you, it just seemed you got into all the pics!
Jhimmy.
P.S Don't try to explore my website as its [censored]!
Forgot to say - are most of you unmarried or otherwise ill-advised on the hat front? The hat suits Phil, but the other hatted people need to take advice.
That's me without the hat - because, of course, I excel in the sartorial area.
Ha ha! - I remember you telling how you leave old underpants on the steering wheel!
I am afraid you might find the answer too a-llama-ing!
-- Martin Richardson 239/284 Munros - 15% to go 34/34 'Furths' & 439/439 Nuttalls - 0% to go 42/89 Donalds - 53% to go 0/? Himalayans - 100% to go 442/1552 Marilyns - 72% to go
I think Roger is boxing his compass, but there is something very odd about Paul. He is standing at a distinct lean, compared with the others, was the camera held straight?
Who's? Mine or Jhimmy's? I do seem to be standing with an unfeasible stance, don't I? Maybe I'm leaning against a fence post? But a few other people seem to be leaning too so maybe Jhimmy's camera was tilted? I shall have to try rotating it to see if it looks more believable.
"Paul Saunders" <[email hidden]> schreef in bericht news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Gordon said:
I think Roger is boxing his compass, but there is something very odd about Paul. He is standing at a distinct lean, compared with the others, was the camera held straight?
Who's? Mine or Jhimmy's? I do seem to be standing with an unfeasible stance, don't I? Maybe I'm leaning against a fence post? But a few other people seem to be leaning too so maybe Jhimmy's camera was tilted? I shall have to try rotating it to see if it looks more believable.
.. Looking at the trees and the fencepost everything looks normal. Perhaps there was galeforce wind. , - ) /
The message <[email hidden]> from "Paul Saunders" <[email hidden]> contains these words:
Quoted message said:
Gordon wrote:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
I think Roger is boxing his compass, but there is something very odd about Paul. He is standing at a distinct lean, compared with the others, was the camera held straight?
Quoted message said:
Who's? Mine or Jhimmy's? I do seem to be standing with an unfeasible stance, don't I? Maybe I'm leaning against a fence post? But a few other people seem to be leaning too so maybe Jhimmy's camera was tilted? I shall have to try rotating it to see if it looks more believable.
But I appear to be upright. Rotate me and I would fall over backwards.
One clue is that those who are leaning are still wearing their rucksacks. Pauls lean is extreme because he is carrying so much photographic equipment. No wonder he ran out of energy. :-)
-- Roger Chapman so far this year 39 summits New - 22 (Marilyns 8, Sweats 5, Outlying Fells 11) Repeats - 17( Marilyns 6, Sweats 12, Wainwrights 11) Knackered knee - 4 times
"Paul Saunders" <[email hidden]> schreef in bericht news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Gordon said:
I think Roger is boxing his compass, but there is something very odd about Paul. He is standing at a distinct lean, compared with the others, was the camera held straight?
Who's? Mine or Jhimmy's? I do seem to be standing with an unfeasible stance, don't I? Maybe I'm leaning against a fence post? But a few other people seem to be leaning too so maybe Jhimmy's camera was tilted? I shall have to try rotating it to see if it looks more believable.
. Looking at the trees and the fencepost everything looks normal. Perhaps there was galeforce wind. , - ) /