Your Bloody Soap Box · Public discussion

Solution to the War on Terror

Started by limerickman · · Last activity · 22 posts · 2,886 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Your Bloody Soap Box
Published
31 October 2004
Last activity
1 November 2004
Original author
limerickman
Posts
22
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,886
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–22 of 22
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. limerickman said:

    No - the reason why he has support is that a large constituency of people think that he is right and that is why he has managed to remain at large.

    If he was a lone voice - he wouldn't have the support that he has had and he would have been captured a long time ago.
    BinLaden/Al Qaeda don't operate in a vacuum.
    People don't support someone for no reason whatsoever.

    It is obvious that the reasons that BinLaden has given to launch this war - clearly resonate with a large constituency of people.

    You've had three years of trying to tackle this matter - new thinking is needed.


    New thinking indeed! Just not yours. A little to simplistic to think that Israel is the source of all the problems. I guess that would resolve the Kashmir problem too. If Bin Laden's statements are true then your arguments have been erroneous. You have stated other past US injustices in the middle east was the cause of Bin Laden. Is that now not true? Is it just Israel or is it a myriad of other grievances?

  2. It's not possible. Israel has its history tied up in that particular land. Even under the Romans Jerusalem was incredibly unstable and political.
    Myself I think that the solution to the war on terror would be to close the most obvious gaps as opposed to getting bogged down in Iraq. They could have invested billlions of dollars on a tighter immigration system to prevent a repetition of terrorists being able to operate in Europe, the U.S. and the U.K. I mean, these people were just wandering all over the U.S. or even setting up terror camps over there. Only Australia seems to have followed the immigration line so far.
    Another point is that Bush was right to highlight the fact something has to be done with the Middle East but it's his methods that are wrong. Sure, Middle Eastern countries should be prosperous and stable, given the oil wealth in the area but bombing them into democracy isn't the solution. It's a tough cookie to crack, though. The Middle East is just so backward and repressed.
    All in all my sympathies are with Israel but they could help themselves (and the U.S.) a lot more if they treated the Palestinians with a little more tact and diplomacy.

    - but I think I have the solution to the War on Terror.

    [censored] with long delays at airports in the USA ?
    [censored] with the polarisation in opinions ?
    [censored] with BinLaden being free - taxes rocketing to fund wars in country's with no WMD etc ?
    All because of the war on terror.

    Here's the solution.

    Binladen and Co are here to stay.
    Three years after hunting him in every knook and cranny, he can appear/disappear at will.
    Bounties/rewards mean nothing : his people are loyal and he's well protected.
    Even if the USA does manage to get him - he has already lit the fuse and
    radicalised major parts of Islam.
    Logistically, logic says that he has a huge groundswell of support in the Islamic world.

    So what is the core issue to all of this dispute between BinLaden and the
    USA ?
    It's Israel.

    The USA needs to look at the War on Terrorism, in a pragmatic way.
    Al Qaeda isn't going to go away - in all likelihood.
    It seems that they can operate with impunity - due to massive support throughout the Islamic world.

    How many Israeli/Jews are there in Israel ?
    10 million ? 20 million ?
    How many Muslims are there ?
    1 billion ?

    The numbers game suggest that the USA ought to be trying to engage BinLaden & Co, rather than antagonising him over 20 million people in a country, the size a small US State surrounded by unhappy Arab states.

    The USA ought to widedraw support for Israel - make it a phased withdrawal.

    To placate Israel - adopt the Balfour Declaration and look at transplanting those 20 million Israeli/Jews to Argentina, for example.
    Ok, there will be hue and cry - there'll be chants of racism and bigotry.

    The numbers game doesn't lie.
    Think about it.[/QUOTE]

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.