rec.bicycles.soc · Public discussion

Re: "It's okay to kill someone, as long as we find a good reason for it afterward"

Started by jazu · · Last activity · 2 posts · 1,642 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
rec.bicycles.soc
Published
3 November 2004
Last activity
3 November 2004
Original author
jazu
Posts
2
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,642
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–2 of 2
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I think we have enough reasons to kill you🙂

    "Mike Vandeman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    This is the logic used to justify the killing of mountain lions SUSPECTED


    of

    Quoted message said:

    attacking a human. Maybe that's where George Bush learned how to


    rationalize

    Quoted message said:

    attacking Iraq. First he said there were "weapons of mass destruction"


    there,

    Quoted message said:

    but when he didn't find any, he changed his tune to "removing a brutal
    dictator".

    If it's so important to make sure, AFTER THE FACT, that the right mountain


    lion

    Quoted message said:

    was killed, I wonder why it isn't important BEFORE killing it?

    In any case, the fact that mountain lions are attacking humans only proves


    that

    Quoted message said:

    we don't belong there. Mountain bikes, at a minimum, should be banned in
    mountain lion habitat (because they greatly extend the range of human


    access).

    Quoted message said:

    Where possible, ALL human access should be banned.
    ===
    I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
    humans ("pure habitat"😉. Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
    years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

    http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

  2. "jazu" <1> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I think we have enough reasons to kill you🙂


    That freedom of speech thing really bothers you, doesn't it?

    Quoted message said:


    "Mike Vandeman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    This is the logic used to justify the killing of mountain lions


    SUSPECTED

    Quoted message said:

    of

    Quoted message said:

    attacking a human. Maybe that's where George Bush learned how to


    rationalize

    Quoted message said:

    attacking Iraq. First he said there were "weapons of mass destruction"


    there,

    Quoted message said:

    but when he didn't find any, he changed his tune to "removing a brutal
    dictator".

    If it's so important to make sure, AFTER THE FACT, that the right


    mountain

    Quoted message said:

    lion

    Quoted message said:

    was killed, I wonder why it isn't important BEFORE killing it?

    In any case, the fact that mountain lions are attacking humans only


    proves

    Quoted message said:

    that

    Quoted message said:

    we don't belong there. Mountain bikes, at a minimum, should be banned in
    mountain lion habitat (because they greatly extend the range of human


    access).

    Quoted message said:

    Where possible, ALL human access should be banned.
    ===
    I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
    humans ("pure habitat"😉. Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
    years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

    http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.