Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

700c Vs. 27" Wheel Size: The Same?

Started by Aman · · Last activity · 46 posts · 2,164 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
8 January 2005
Last activity
12 January 2005
Original author
Aman
Posts
46
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,164
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 46
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Hello,

    Are 27" wheels, which I usually see on road bikes from
    the 1970's, the same size as 700c? What does the c stand for
    anyway?

    Mainly what I want to know is one slightly bigger than
    the other, and which is bigger? I'm talking diameter.

    Please e-mail me back personally, as well as the newsgroup.

    Thanks for your time, Happy Trails, Alex

  2. "Aman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Hello,

    Are 27" wheels, which I usually see on road bikes from
    the 1970's, the same size as 700c? What does the c stand for
    anyway?

    Mainly what I want to know is one slightly bigger than
    the other, and which is bigger? I'm talking diameter.

    Please e-mail me back personally, as well as the newsgroup.

    Thanks for your time, Happy Trails, Alex

    I think 27" wheels are slightly larger.

  3. Aman said:


    Hello,

    Are 27" wheels, which I usually see on road bikes from
    the 1970's, the same size as 700c? What does the c stand for
    anyway?

    Mainly what I want to know is one slightly bigger than
    the other, and which is bigger? I'm talking diameter.

    Please e-mail me back personally, as well as the newsgroup.

    Thanks for your time, Happy Trails, Alex

    Dear Alex,

    No, 27 & 1/4" rims and tires are a slightly different size
    than 700c rims and tires--you can't swap them.

    The c in 700c is not for centimeters, but for some sort of
    rim width, as in a-b-c-d-e.

    If you go to this site and start browsing the "bicycle
    glossary" and searching for things, you'll waste an
    astonishing amount of extremely enjoyable time:

    www.sheldonbrown.com

    Carl Fogel

  4. Aman said:


    Hello,

    Are 27" wheels, which I usually see on road bikes from
    the 1970's, the same size as 700c? What does the c stand for
    anyway?

    Mainly what I want to know is one slightly bigger than
    the other, and which is bigger? I'm talking diameter.

    Please e-mail me back personally, as well as the newsgroup.

    Thanks for your time, Happy Trails, Alex

    Dear Alex,

    I went back, just to see how long it would take to find the
    answer to your size question, and was horrified to see that
    "rim" fails to give an instant answer--I honestly don't know
    why we pay Sheldon so lavishly to keep that site up and
    running if it takes two stabs.

    So here's a direct link:

    http://www.sheldonbrown.com/tire-sizing.html

    The size question is answered by the fourth line of the
    first table. For 700a-b-c, you have to go down to "French
    sizes."

    Carl Fogel

  5. On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:35:55 -0800, "yum" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    "Aman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Hello,

    Are 27" wheels, which I usually see on road bikes from
    the 1970's, the same size as 700c? What does the c stand for
    anyway?

    Mainly what I want to know is one slightly bigger than
    the other, and which is bigger? I'm talking diameter.

    Please e-mail me back personally, as well as the newsgroup.

    Thanks for your time, Happy Trails, Alex

    I think 27" wheels are slightly larger.


    Dear Yum,

    There is some support for that theory, given that one rim is
    630mm and the other 622mm:

    http://www.sheldonbrown.com/tire-sizing.html

    Cautiously,

    Carl Fogel

  6. Carl Fogel said:

    ...
    No, 27 & 1/4" rims and tires are a slightly different size
    than 700c rims and tires--you can't swap them....

    Clinchers of the two sizes are not interchangeable [1], but inner tubes
    are [2]. Just like inner tubes, sew-up/tubular tires are the same for
    either size.

    [1] One might be able to get a ISO 630-mm (27"😉 tire inflated on an ISO
    622-mm (700C) rim, but the risk of a blowout and/or rolling the tire off
    the rim would be very high.
    [2] Most are marked for both sizes, inner tube rubber being elastic
    enough that the approximate 2.5 cm/1" difference in circumference is
    inconsequential.

    --
    Tom Sherman - Near Rock Island

  7. Tom Sherman said:
    Carl Fogel said:

    ...
    No, 27 & 1/4" rims and tires are a slightly different size
    than 700c rims and tires--you can't swap them....

    Clinchers of the two sizes are not interchangeable [1], but inner tubes
    are [2]. Just like inner tubes, sew-up/tubular tires are the same for
    either size.

    Tubes are interchangeable given the amount of stretch they
    have. But there are no 27" sew-up/tubular tires - they've only
    been offered in the 700c size and would certainly not work on a
    rim with an 8mm larger diameter.

  8. Peter said:

    Tubes are interchangeable given the amount of stretch they
    have. But there are no 27" sew-up/tubular tires - they've only
    been offered in the 700c size and would certainly not work on a
    rim with an 8mm larger diameter.

    You'd be surprised! Back in the day, I was out for a ride with a bunch
    of friends and I flatted. Turned out that my tube had a bad valve and I
    couldn't pump it up. I was riding 27" clinchers, the others in the
    group were on tubulars. I borrowed a spare tubular from one of them and
    managed to get it onto the 27" clincher rim with a bit of force.

    It was quite secure, no danger of falling off, but it didn't protrude
    all that far past the clincher rim, so I was a bit nervous riding back
    home...but it was better than walking back from Gloucester!

    Sheldon "Necessity Is A Mother" Brown
    +-------------------------------------+
    | Only those who attempt the absurd |
    | will achieve the impossible. |
    | --Albert Einstein |
    +-------------------------------------+
    Harris Cyclery, West Newton, Massachusetts
    Phone 617-244-9772 FAX 617-244-1041
    http://harriscyclery.com
    Hard-to-find parts shipped Worldwide
    http://captainbike.com http://sheldonbrown.com

  9. Aman said:

    (1) Are 27" wheels, which I usually see on road bikes from
    the 1970's, the same size as 700c? (2)What does the c stand for
    anyway?
    (3) Mainly what I want to know is one slightly bigger than
    the other, and which is bigger? I'm talking diameter.
    (4)Please e-mail me back personally, as well as the newsgroup.

    As Mr Fogel might say:
    www.google.com or Mr. Brown's informative site

    (1)No, they are different sizes

    (2)The earlier versions (700A,700B}were also roughly 700mm
    diameter at the outside but with different bead seat diameters*.

    (3) 700C brake shoes are 5~6mm lower than 27 inch.
    The actual diameter is molded into the side of your tires.
    27" are 630mm dia =1956mm circumference*
    700C are 622mm dia =1978mm circumference*

    *Bead seat diameter is the inside edge of your tire. That's
    the same size as the lip on which your tire seats inside the
    rim.

    (4) No.

    --
    Andrew Muzi
    www.yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971,

  10. A Muzi said:
    Aman said:

    (1) Are 27" wheels, which I usually see on road bikes from
    the 1970's, the same size as 700c? (2)What does the c stand for
    anyway?
    (3) Mainly what I want to know is one slightly bigger than
    the other, and which is bigger? I'm talking diameter.
    (4)Please e-mail me back personally, as well as the newsgroup.

    As Mr Fogel might say:
    www.google.com or Mr. Brown's informative site

    (1)No, they are different sizes

    (2)The earlier versions (700A,700B}were also roughly 700mm
    diameter at the outside but with different bead seat diameters*.

    (3) 700C brake shoes are 5~6mm lower than 27 inch.
    The actual diameter is molded into the side of your tires.
    27" are 630mm dia =1956mm circumference*
    700C are 622mm dia =1978mm circumference*

    *Bead seat diameter is the inside edge of your tire. That's
    the same size as the lip on which your tire seats inside the
    rim.

    (4) No.

    Dear Andrew,

    You're right and I'm wrong--the a-b-c is for bead seat
    diameter, not rim width.

    Slightly less ignorantly,

    Carl Fogel

  11. Sheldon Brown said:

    Sheldon "Necessity Is A Mother" Brown

    You invent that?

  12. Sheldon Brown said:
    Peter said:

    Tubes are interchangeable given the amount of stretch they
    have. But there are no 27" sew-up/tubular tires - they've only
    been offered in the 700c size and would certainly not work on a
    rim with an 8mm larger diameter.

    You'd be surprised! Back in the day, I was out for a ride with a bunch
    of friends and I flatted. Turned out that my tube had a bad valve and I
    couldn't pump it up. I was riding 27" clinchers, the others in the
    group were on tubulars. I borrowed a spare tubular from one of them and
    managed to get it onto the 27" clincher rim with a bit of force.

    No, that doesn't surprise me at all, but it's quite different from
    getting that tubular onto a rim made for tubulars but with an 8 mm
    larger diameter. Putting it on a 630 mm clincher rim lets the
    tire drop down into the deeper channel and gives you about the same
    effective diameter as the 622 mm tubular rim. I noticed a similar
    effect when changing my tubular rims to clincher. If I switched to a
    700c clincher rim the old spokes would have been too long, but by
    switching to a 27" clincher rim the spokes could be reused. (And
    at that time 27" clincher tires were easier to find than 700c -
    not anymore.) The brake shoes had sufficient adjustment for either
    size.

  13. Quoted message said:
    Carl Fogel said:

    No, 27 & 1/4" rims and tires are a slightly different size
    than 700c rims and tires--you can't swap them....

    Tom Sherman said:

    Clinchers of the two sizes are not interchangeable [1], but inner tubes
    are [2]. Just like inner tubes, sew-up/tubular tires are the same for
    either size.
    [1] One might be able to get a ISO 630-mm (27"😉 tire inflated on an ISO
    622-mm (700C) rim, but the risk of a blowout and/or rolling the tire off
    the rim would be very high.
    [2] Most are marked for both sizes, inner tube rubber being elastic
    enough that the approximate 2.5 cm/1" difference in circumference is
    inconsequential.

    I understood your explanation of the tubes - tubes fit
    interchangeably between these similar diameters as long as
    the width is appropriate.

    But you lost me on the tubulars.

    The two clinchers 'wire-ons'😉 are 622mm and 630mm
    respectively. Tubulars are just tubulars amd have been of
    one universal diameter for a hundred years. However,
    various manufacturers mark them 700, 27 and 28 inches
    without logical explanation. A tubular brake surface is at
    the same diameter as a 700C rin.

    --
    Andrew Muzi
    www.yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

  14. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Aman wrote:


    -snip-
    27" wheels ? 700C wheels? Nomenclature?

    (am)-snip-

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    (2)The earlier versions (700A,700B}were also roughly 700mm
    diameter at the outside but with different bead seat diameters*.

    [email hidden] wrote:
    -snip-

    the a-b-c is for bead seat

    Quoted message said:

    diameter, not rim width.

    Right . It's an hysterical progression. Or was that historical?

    There's an inexorable trend to miniaturization in tires ,
    tubes, rims. 700 A, B, C ( and that evil, short-lived D)
    are smaller with every iteration.

    In our times, notice how much smaller a 27x1-1/4" (K2) tire
    is compared to twenty years ago! The classic 26x1-1/8"
    (EA3) has also been on a diet, being about 2/3 the width it
    was in the seventies.

    And inner tubes! Much skinnier in every 'size' every few
    years or so.
    --
    Andrew Muzi
    www.yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

  15. A Muzi said:
    Quoted message said:
    Carl Fogel said:

    No, 27 & 1/4" rims and tires are a slightly different size
    than 700c rims and tires--you can't swap them....

    Tom Sherman said:

    Clinchers of the two sizes are not interchangeable [1], but inner
    tubes are [2]. Just like inner tubes, sew-up/tubular tires are the
    same for either size.
    [1] One might be able to get a ISO 630-mm (27"😉 tire inflated on an
    ISO 622-mm (700C) rim, but the risk of a blowout and/or rolling the
    tire off the rim would be very high.
    [2] Most are marked for both sizes, inner tube rubber being elastic
    enough that the approximate 2.5 cm/1" difference in circumference is
    inconsequential.

    I understood your explanation of the tubes - tubes fit interchangeably
    between these similar diameters as long as the width is appropriate.

    But you lost me on the tubulars.

    The two clinchers 'wire-ons'😉 are 622mm and 630mm respectively.
    Tubulars are just tubulars amd have been of one universal diameter for a
    hundred years. However, various manufacturers mark them 700, 27 and 28
    inches without logical explanation. A tubular brake surface is at the
    same diameter as a 700C rin.

    I should have stated it differently - tubulars are the same size (within
    production, model, and manufacturer tolerances) whether or not they are
    marked "27-inch" or "700C".

    --
    Tom Sherman - Near Rock Island

  16. Aman said:


    Hello,

    Are 27" wheels, which I usually see on road bikes from
    the 1970's, the same size as 700c?

    No. They are close, but not the same; there's 8mm of difference in
    diameter, which is enough that the tires can't safely be interchanged.

    Quoted message said:

    What does the c stand for
    anyway?

    It's a letter. The 700C rim is 622mm in diameter at the bead seat,
    the 700B is 635mm, and the 700D is 587mm. Why are they all 700?
    Because that's the approximate outside diameter of the wheel and tire
    assembly as originally developed; from A through D, the idea was that
    the tires would get wider...but what ended up happening was something
    else entirely. 700B rims got used for European rod-brake roadsters
    with relatively fat tires which made them larger than 700mm overall,
    while 700C rims became the common size for racing-oriented bikes with
    very narrow tires, and 700D basically fell out of usage.

    Quoted message said:

    Mainly what I want to know is one slightly bigger than
    the other, and which is bigger? I'm talking diameter.

    The rim for a 27" tire is slightly larger than the rim for a 700C.
    Some frames which were originally set up for for 27" can be swapped
    over to 700C successfully, some can't. It's a matter of brake reach.

    --
    Typoes are a feature, not a bug.
    Some gardening required to reply via email.
    Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.

  17. Sheldon Brown said:
    Peter said:

    Tubes are interchangeable given the amount of stretch they
    have. But there are no 27" sew-up/tubular tires - they've only
    been offered in the 700c size and would certainly not work on a
    rim with an 8mm larger diameter.

    You'd be surprised! Back in the day, I was out for a ride with a bunch
    of friends and I flatted. Turned out that my tube had a bad valve and I
    couldn't pump it up. I was riding 27" clinchers, the others in the
    group were on tubulars. I borrowed a spare tubular from one of them and
    managed to get it onto the 27" clincher rim with a bit of force.

    It was quite secure, no danger of falling off, but it didn't protrude
    all that far past the clincher rim, so I was a bit nervous riding back
    home...but it was better than walking back from Gloucester!

    Sheldon "Necessity Is A Mother" Brown
    +-------------------------------------+
    | Only those who attempt the absurd |
    | will achieve the impossible. |
    | --Albert Einstein |
    +-------------------------------------+
    Harris Cyclery, West Newton, Massachusetts
    Phone 617-244-9772 FAX 617-244-1041
    http://harriscyclery.com
    Hard-to-find parts shipped Worldwide
    http://captainbike.com http://sheldonbrown.com

    Sew up tires are quite forgiving in what diameter rim they'll go on.
    I've successfully used "700C" sew up tires on 650C rims. I just kept
    inflating -- the tire got smaller and smaller!

  18. I nicked:

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    Sheldon "Necessity Is A Mother" Brown



    Bill Sornson asked:

    Quoted message said:

    You invent that?

    Nope. Mighta been Jim Heaney, can't recall for sure.

    Sheldon "Open Beer" Brown
    +---------------------------------------------------+
    | Originality is the fine art of remembering |
    | what you hear but forgetting where you heard it. |
    | -- Laurence Peter |
    +---------------------------------------------------+
    Harris Cyclery, West Newton, Massachusetts
    Phone 617-244-9772 FAX 617-244-1041
    http://harriscyclery.com
    Hard-to-find parts shipped Worldwide
    http://captainbike.com http://sheldonbrown.com

  19. A Muzi said:

    In our times, notice how much smaller a 27x1-1/4" (K2) tire
    is compared to twenty years ago! The classic 26x1-1/8"
    (EA3) has also been on a diet, being about 2/3 the width it
    was in the seventies.

    And inner tubes! Much skinnier in every 'size' every few
    years or so.

    It's like candy bars- instead of raising the price, they just shrink
    the product to keep costs down. Brings a whole new meaning to
    "inflation".

    Jeff

  20. dianne_1234 said:

    On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 23:06:18 -0500, Sheldon Brown

    Quoted message said:
    Peter said:

    Tubes are interchangeable given the amount of stretch they
    have. But there are no 27" sew-up/tubular tires - they've only
    been offered in the 700c size and would certainly not work on a
    rim with an 8mm larger diameter.

    You'd be surprised! Back in the day, I was out for a ride with a bunch
    of friends and I flatted. Turned out that my tube had a bad valve and I
    couldn't pump it up. I was riding 27" clinchers, the others in the
    group were on tubulars. I borrowed a spare tubular from one of them and
    managed to get it onto the 27" clincher rim with a bit of force.

    It was quite secure, no danger of falling off, but it didn't protrude
    all that far past the clincher rim, so I was a bit nervous riding back
    home...but it was better than walking back from Gloucester!

    Sheldon "Necessity Is A Mother" Brown
    +-------------------------------------+
    | Only those who attempt the absurd |
    | will achieve the impossible. |
    | --Albert Einstein |
    +-------------------------------------+
    Harris Cyclery, West Newton, Massachusetts
    Phone 617-244-9772 FAX 617-244-1041
    http://harriscyclery.com
    Hard-to-find parts shipped Worldwide
    http://captainbike.com http://sheldonbrown.com

    Sew up tires are quite forgiving in what diameter rim they'll go on.
    I've successfully used "700C" sew up tires on 650C rims. I just kept
    inflating -- the tire got smaller and smaller!

    How was performance with the 700C sew up on the 650C rim?

    Was that a clincher rim?

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.