General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Canadian government to ban trans fats

Started by Elmer · · Last activity · 14 posts · 750 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
20 November 2004
Last activity
12 February 2005
Original author
Elmer
Posts
14
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
750
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–14 of 14
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. ³Canadian government and opposition parties unite to declare war on
    trans fats

    Canadian Press Friday, November 19, 2004
    OTTAWA (CP) - In a rare moment of consensus, the government and
    opposition parties have united to declare war on trans fats.

    Canada will become the second country in the world, after Denmark, to
    seek a virtual ban on trans fats from its national menu.

    Denmark has set a goal of reducing trans fats to no more than two per
    cent of food content but Bennett said Canada's goal will be adapted to
    its food supply.

    The government will create a task force including experts from the food
    industry, academia and advocacy groups to recommend strategies for
    reducing trans fats in food, Carolyn Bennett, secretary of state for
    public health, announced Thursday.

    She noted that canola oil, an important Canadian product, contains three
    per cent trans fats. It's highly unlikely that any party would want to
    damage the canola industry. ³

    This last statements puzzles me because I have always been told that
    these oils have no trans fats unless they have been hydrogenated (see:
    www.bantransfats.com/fatsinoils.htm)

    Such legislation is a step up from simply requiring products to list
    the trans fat content in small print!

    Elmer

  2. Elmer <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    ³Canadian government and opposition parties unite to declare war on
    trans fats

    Canadian Press Friday, November 19, 2004
    OTTAWA (CP) - In a rare moment of consensus, the government and
    opposition parties have united to declare war on trans fats.

    Canada will become the second country in the world, after Denmark, to
    seek a virtual ban on trans fats from its national menu.

    Denmark has set a goal of reducing trans fats to no more than two per
    cent of food content but Bennett said Canada's goal will be adapted to
    its food supply.

    The government will create a task force including experts from the food
    industry, academia and advocacy groups to recommend strategies for
    reducing trans fats in food, Carolyn Bennett, secretary of state for
    public health, announced Thursday.

    She noted that canola oil, an important Canadian product, contains three
    per cent trans fats. It's highly unlikely that any party would want to
    damage the canola industry. ³

    This last statements puzzles me because I have always been told that
    these oils have no trans fats unless they have been hydrogenated (see:
    www.bantransfats.com/fatsinoils.htm)

    Such legislation is a step up from simply requiring products to list
    the trans fat content in small print!

    Elmer

    Canola is a highly processed fat/oil. And it is extracted from a plant
    that is highly genetically modified. 30 years ago, the canola plant
    did not exist. It does not surprise me that it contains trans fats.

    I've stopped using canola oil and have substituted olive oil (extra
    virgin of course) and fresh butter for all my cooking needs.

    I think this legislation is the only approach that makes sense since
    any trans fat in the diet is a negative.

    And the only reason that this legislation stands a chance of passing
    is because Canada has a multiple party system and it has resulted in a
    minority government. That means that the govt has fewer seat in
    Parliament than all the other parties combined, which means that they
    have to govern in a cooperative fashion, as opposed to the extreme
    confrontational and divided politics in the US.

    TC

  3. tcomeau said:

    I've stopped using canola oil and have substituted olive oil (extra
    virgin of course) and fresh butter for all my cooking needs.

    Quoted message said:

    I think this legislation is the only approach that makes sense since
    any trans fat in the diet is a negative.

    Except the trans fats in butter?

    --
    Chris Malcolm [email hidden] +44 (0)131 651 3445 DoD #205
    IPAB, Informatics, JCMB, King's Buildings, Edinburgh, EH9 3JZ, UK
    [http://www.dai.ed.ac.uk/homes/cam/]

  4. [email hidden] (tcomeau) wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    Elmer <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    ³Canadian government and opposition parties unite to declare war on
    trans fats

    Canadian Press Friday, November 19, 2004
    OTTAWA (CP) - In a rare moment of consensus, the government and
    opposition parties have united to declare war on trans fats.

    Canada will become the second country in the world, after Denmark, to
    seek a virtual ban on trans fats from its national menu.

    Denmark has set a goal of reducing trans fats to no more than two per
    cent of food content but Bennett said Canada's goal will be adapted to
    its food supply.

    The government will create a task force including experts from the food
    industry, academia and advocacy groups to recommend strategies for
    reducing trans fats in food, Carolyn Bennett, secretary of state for
    public health, announced Thursday.

    She noted that canola oil, an important Canadian product, contains three
    per cent trans fats. It's highly unlikely that any party would want to
    damage the canola industry. ³

    This last statements puzzles me because I have always been told that
    these oils have no trans fats unless they have been hydrogenated (see:
    www.bantransfats.com/fatsinoils.htm)

    Such legislation is a step up from simply requiring products to list
    the trans fat content in small print!

    Elmer

    Canola is a highly processed fat/oil. And it is extracted from a plant
    that is highly genetically modified. 30 years ago, the canola plant
    did not exist. It does not surprise me that it contains trans fats.

    [censored]! "Canola" is simply rape seed that has been selectively bred
    for several generations to increase yield. It is and always has been a
    member of the mustard plant family.

    Quoted message said:

    I've stopped using canola oil and have substituted olive oil (extra
    virgin of course) and fresh butter for all my cooking needs.

    To what end? Heating of *any* oil results in trans fats. The
    temperatures vary somewhat but the end result is the same.

    Quoted message said:

    I think this legislation is the only approach that makes sense since
    any trans fat in the diet is a negative.

    Then purchase Omega Nutrition oils. You will see on the label that
    they clearly warn not for "cooking, baking or frying." The temperature
    to which each oil can safely be heated and consumed is also on the
    label.

    Quoted message said:

    And the only reason that this legislation stands a chance of passing
    is because Canada has a multiple party system and it has resulted in a
    minority government. That means that the govt has fewer seat in
    Parliament than all the other parties combined, which means that they
    have to govern in a cooperative fashion, as opposed to the extreme
    confrontational and divided politics in the US.

    TC

  5. On 22 Nov 2004 06:57:05 -0800, [email hidden] (tcomeau) posted:

    Quoted message said:

    Elmer <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    ³Canadian government and opposition parties unite to declare war on
    trans fats

    Canadian Press Friday, November 19, 2004
    OTTAWA (CP) - In a rare moment of consensus, the government and
    opposition parties have united to declare war on trans fats.

    Canada will become the second country in the world, after Denmark, to
    seek a virtual ban on trans fats from its national menu.

    Denmark has set a goal of reducing trans fats to no more than two per
    cent of food content but Bennett said Canada's goal will be adapted to
    its food supply.

    The government will create a task force including experts from the food
    industry, academia and advocacy groups to recommend strategies for
    reducing trans fats in food, Carolyn Bennett, secretary of state for
    public health, announced Thursday.

    She noted that canola oil, an important Canadian product, contains three
    per cent trans fats. It's highly unlikely that any party would want to
    damage the canola industry. ³

    This last statements puzzles me because I have always been told that
    these oils have no trans fats unless they have been hydrogenated (see:
    www.bantransfats.com/fatsinoils.htm)

    Such legislation is a step up from simply requiring products to list
    the trans fat content in small print!

    Elmer

    Canola is a highly processed fat/oil.

    Nope, it's rapeseed oil. It's been refined from the seed.

    Quoted message said:

    And it is extracted from a plant
    that is highly genetically modified.

    Nope, it has had the erucic acid expression bred out of it. This was
    toxic. I think the yield has been increased as well.

    Quoted message said:

    30 years ago, the canola plant
    did not exist.

    Neither did all plants bred in the last 30 years. So what?

    Quoted message said:

    It does not surprise me that it contains trans fats.

    Lots of things contain trans fats. It is a "natural" substance.

    Quoted message said:

    I've stopped using canola oil and have substituted olive oil (extra
    virgin of course) and fresh butter for all my cooking needs.

    Why? They are totally unnecessary empty calories.
    Best to do without them.

    Quoted message said:

    I think this legislation is the only approach that makes sense since
    any trans fat in the diet is a negative.

    So is erucic acid. We have evolved to tolerate a small,
    naturally-occuring amount of trans fats.

  6. On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 13:05:13 +0800, Dunne E. Dawe <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Nope, it has had the erucic acid expression bred out of it. This was
    toxic. I think the yield has been increased as well.

    More correct, it was thought to be toxic since rat hearts couldn't
    break it down. Peroxisomes of rodents do not rapidly enough induce the
    enzymes needed to break down the fatty acid.

    But later it turned out to be a specific rodent problem :-) Of very
    little interest to humans. (Otherwise China should now be desolated,
    no one living there, because theoretically, everyone should have died
    of heart attacks using daily erucic oil high-content rape seed oils
    for food production.
    (Stay away from stir-fried China food if erucic oil concerns you!)

  7. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Nope, it has had the erucic acid expression bred out of it. This was
    toxic. I think the yield has been increased as well.

    Quoted message said:

    More correct, it was thought to be toxic since rat hearts couldn't
    break it down. Peroxisomes of rodents do not rapidly enough induce the
    enzymes needed to break down the fatty acid.

    Quoted message said:

    But later it turned out to be a specific rodent problem :-) Of very
    little interest to humans.

    Yes, rats fed on a diet containing 10-20 percent rapeseed oil (~40
    percent erucic acid) do develop heart lesions and organ damage, this
    effect has been seen in several studies. The same thing happens in pigs
    as well, which is why there are now strict limits on erucic acid
    content in vegetable oils for human consumption. Unlike most muscle
    tissue, heart muscle relies exclusively on fatty acids as its energy
    source, and erucic acid seems to block the enzymes needed to metabolise
    them.

    -Hugh

  8. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Nope, it has had the erucic acid expression bred out of it. This was
    toxic. I think the yield has been increased as well.

    Quoted message said:

    More correct, it was thought to be toxic since rat hearts couldn't
    break it down. Peroxisomes of rodents do not rapidly enough induce the
    enzymes needed to break down the fatty acid.

    Quoted message said:

    But later it turned out to be a specific rodent problem :-) Of very
    little interest to humans.

    Yes, rats fed on a diet containing 10-20 percent rapeseed oil (~40
    percent erucic acid) do develop heart lesions and organ damage, this
    effect has been seen in several studies. The same thing happens in pigs
    as well, which is why there are now strict limits on erucic acid
    content in vegetable oils for human consumption. Unlike most muscle
    tissue, heart muscle relies exclusively on fatty acids as its energy
    source, and erucic acid seems to block the enzymes needed to metabolise
    them.

    -Hugh

  9. Hugh said:


    Yes, rats fed on a diet containing 10-20 percent rapeseed oil (~40
    percent erucic acid) do develop heart lesions and organ damage, this
    effect has been seen in several studies. The same thing happens in pigs
    as well, which is why there are now strict limits on erucic acid
    content in vegetable oils for human consumption. Unlike most muscle
    tissue, heart muscle relies exclusively on fatty acids as its energy
    source, and erucic acid seems to block the enzymes needed to metabolise
    them.

    I have been working with collegues that worked in that area several
    years ago, and they say sorry, that was an erroneous conclusion when
    it concern humans. When checking humans, it turned out that the
    peroxisomes was able to cope with it after a few days. But that effect
    is specific, to humans.

    Otherwise most Chinese people would have died in very young age,
    almost all of them since their rape seed oil used in kitchen contain
    huge amounts of erucic acids. And still does. But even then, most
    people don't develope the side effects you mention. But rodents do.

    (Back in 1975 I thought about working with that problem, having slides
    of rat and hears with these fat deposits.)

    But anyway, development of different brands of LEAR oils minimize that
    problem anyway. Canola oil seeds is just one of the breeds, here in
    Scandinavia other breeds are used for oil production.

  10. Alf Christophersen said:
    Hugh said:


    Yes, rats fed on a diet containing 10-20 percent rapeseed oil (~40
    percent erucic acid) do develop heart lesions and organ damage, this
    effect has been seen in several studies. The same thing happens in


    pigs

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    as well, which is why there are now strict limits on erucic acid
    content in vegetable oils for human consumption. Unlike most muscle
    tissue, heart muscle relies exclusively on fatty acids as its energy
    source, and erucic acid seems to block the enzymes needed to


    metabolise

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    them.

    I have been working with collegues that worked in that area several
    years ago, and they say sorry, that was an erroneous conclusion when
    it concern humans. When checking humans, it turned out that the
    peroxisomes was able to cope with it after a few days. But that effect
    is specific, to humans.


    So, scientists did clinical trials on people after finding that it
    caused heart and liver damage in laboratory animals? Seems unlikely,
    but then, considering how much profit could be made by convincing
    people to eat what is basically an industrial oil, maybe that is what
    happened.

    Quoted message said:

    Otherwise most Chinese people would have died in very young age,
    almost all of them since their rape seed oil used in kitchen contain
    huge amounts of erucic acids.

    Following that logic, the traditional diet of the Chamorro people of
    Guam must be safe to eat as well. The problems they suffered with
    Parkinsons disease, ALS and dementia must have had nothing to do with
    chronic exposure to the phytotoxins in the food they were eating after
    all.

    The point is that a lot of traditional foods are quite toxic, and
    probably do cause long-term health problems for those eating them. If
    rapeseed oil causes heart and organ damage in rats and pigs, then it's
    a fair bet that it does the same in humans, irrespective of whether
    it's used in chinese cooking or not. In any case, the chinese eat such
    a wide variety of foodstuffs (anything from cats and dogs to nests made
    from bird spit), that rapeseed oil is unlikely to have aver been their
    main source of dietary fat.

    As the saying goes, "the dose makes the poison". The Chamorro people
    only started becoming ill in great numbers after they acquired guns,
    which allowed them to hunt fruit bats (a local delicacy) far more
    effectively than before. The fruit bats had absorbed and concentrated a
    poison from the seeds of the cycad tree, which was their main food
    source. The Chamorroans also used the seeds to make flour, but this
    isn't though to have given them enough of the poison to make them ill.
    It is only when they began hunting the fruit bats with guns that their
    intake of the poison became great enough to produce illness.

    Canola and other vegetable oils have been so heavily promoted as
    "healthy" and are so widely used in processed foods, that people are
    consuming them in far larger quantities than ever before. I've also
    heard that there are other very long-chain fatty acids found in
    vegetable oils that can inhibit the same enzymes affected by erucic
    acid.

    If you look at the epidemiology of the heart disease epidemic in
    Western countries, coronary heart disease as a cause of death was
    extremely rare when people had butter and lard as their main source of
    dietary fat. Then, late in the 19th century, industrialisation was
    applied to agriculture and it became possible to manufacture vegetable
    oils very cheaply. It was found that by adding hydrogen to vegetable
    oil, it could be converted into a solid - margarine - that could be
    used as a cheap substitute for butter. Vegetable oil consumption
    soared, and soon after, doctors noticed increasing numbers of their
    patients dying from heart attacks. As vegetable oil consumption
    continued to increase, so did the incidence of heart disease and within
    the space of a few decades, CHD went from a rare condition to being the
    commonest cause of death in Westernised countries.

    To be fair, there were other changes in diet and lifestyle occurring at
    the same time which probably contributed to the heart disease epidemic,
    but the fact remains that it has occurred at the very time that
    vegetable oil consumption is at its highest.

    -Hugh

  11. Hugh said:

    So, scientists did clinical trials on people after finding that it
    caused heart and liver damage in laboratory animals? Seems unlikely,
    but then, considering how much profit could be made by convincing
    people to eat what is basically an industrial oil, maybe that is what
    happened.

    No need to make any kind of experiment.

    Chinese people use daily unrefined rape seed oil for woking.

  12. Hugh said:

    it's used in chinese cooking or not. In any case, the chinese eat such
    a wide variety of foodstuffs (anything from cats and dogs to nests made
    from bird spit), that rapeseed oil is unlikely to have aver been their
    main source of dietary fat.

    Woking is one of the prime way of preparing food, so using unrefined
    rape seed oil for that make rape seed oil a primary source of fat.

    And it has been used so for long times.

  13. Hugh said:

    If you look at the epidemiology of the heart disease epidemic in
    Western countries, coronary heart disease as a cause of death was
    extremely rare when people had butter and lard as their main source of
    dietary fat. Then, late in the 19th century, industrialisation was
    applied to agriculture and it became possible to manufacture vegetable
    oils very cheaply. It was found that by adding hydrogen to vegetable
    oil, it could be converted into a solid - margarine - that could be
    used as a cheap substitute for butter. Vegetable oil consumption
    soared, and soon after, doctors noticed increasing numbers of their
    patients dying from heart attacks. As vegetable oil consumption
    continued to increase, so did the incidence of heart disease and within
    the space of a few decades, CHD went from a rare condition to being the
    commonest cause of death in Westernised countries.

    If this concerns you, you should use an oil low in omega-6 fat, about
    equal in omega-3 fat, lot of monounsaturated fats and low in saturated
    fats.
    And stay away from fats that are high in transfats (since btw. others,
    transfat inhibit incorporation of PUFA into inositolphospholipids.

    I find only one oil that really fits.

    You will of course on behalf of all olive oil producers proclaim it
    must be olive oil,but sorry, LEAR oils are better in respect of PUFA
    content :-)

  14. "Alf Christophersen" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Hugh said:

    If you look at the epidemiology of the heart disease epidemic in
    Western countries, coronary heart disease as a cause of death was
    extremely rare when people had butter and lard as their main source of
    dietary fat. Then, late in the 19th century, industrialisation was
    applied to agriculture and it became possible to manufacture vegetable
    oils very cheaply. It was found that by adding hydrogen to vegetable
    oil, it could be converted into a solid - margarine - that could be
    used as a cheap substitute for butter. Vegetable oil consumption
    soared, and soon after, doctors noticed increasing numbers of their
    patients dying from heart attacks. As vegetable oil consumption
    continued to increase, so did the incidence of heart disease and within
    the space of a few decades, CHD went from a rare condition to being the
    commonest cause of death in Westernised countries.

    If this concerns you, you should use an oil low in omega-6 fat, about
    equal in omega-3 fat, lot of monounsaturated fats and low in saturated
    fats.
    And stay away from fats that are high in transfats (since btw. others,
    transfat inhibit incorporation of PUFA into inositolphospholipids.

    I find only one oil that really fits.

    You will of course on behalf of all olive oil producers proclaim it
    must be olive oil,but sorry, LEAR oils are better in respect of PUFA
    content :-)

    When I heat oils above boiling temp, I use stable oils such as coconut or
    palm oils.
    But then again, this is a rather minor dietary component for me.
    Olive oil I use in homemade salad dressing.
    And I get sizable amounts of PUFA from raw nuts plus
    some more from wild fish.

    Quoted message said:

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.