Re: Too Much Red Meat Bad for Long-Term Health

This "scientific study" aka "indirect marketing effort" has been
unravelled at:

http://makeashorterlink.com/?T23E12E8A

TC

Andrew B. Chung said:

Answer: Yes.

Truth is simple for those who discern it...

http://makeashorterlink.com/?A2642108A

You will remain in my prayers, dear Frank, whom I love, in Christ's

holy

Quoted message said:

name.

May you reject your pride and accept Him as your personal Lord and
Savior, someday, so that you too will have eternal life and the
fascinating riches of His everlasting kingdom.

Here's how:

http://makeashorterlink.com/?I22222129

Please note that God truly made this special link describing that He

is

Quoted message said:

the great "I am" and that His message is as simple as the number 2

which

Quoted message said:

is a number between 1 to 9 and reminds us of His 2 commandments, the

2

Quoted message said:

arms of the cross, the 2nd part of the Trinity, the 2 finger sign of

the

Quoted message said:

Prince of Peace [who remains *V*ictorious over death and satan], and

the

Quoted message said:

2PD Approach. Let it not ever be written that Christ did not make

His

Quoted message said:

presence known here on Usenet :-)

Also, note that Exodus 16:16 continues to remind us that 16 oz plus

16

Quoted message said:

oz makes 2 pounds, which is "a certain measure of weight," which is

what

Quoted message said:

"omer" literally means in Hebrew.

Enter the 2PD-OMER Approach:

http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtloss.asp

At His service,

Andrew

--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-Certified Cardiologist

**
Suggested Reading:
(1) http://makeashorterlink.com/?L26062048
(2) http://makeashorterlink.com/?O2F325D1A
(3) http://makeashorterlink.com/?X1C62661A
(4) http://makeashorterlink.com/?U1E13130A
(5) http://makeashorterlink.com/?K6F72510A
(6) http://makeashorterlink.com/?I24E5151A
(7) http://makeashorterlink.com/?I22222129

listener said:

"TC" <[email hidden]> wrote in
news:[email hidden]:

Quoted message said:

jt wrote:
> >***********
> >
> >So General Mills is weighing in on low-carb diets. Any

surprises in

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> >their "findings"? Not really. You guys have to check into who

is

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

doing
> >these "studies". This is a perfect example of indirect

marketing

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> >masquerading as science. And the journal does not show any
declarations
> >of conflict of interest whatsoever. Nor does the news article.

Now

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

the
> >question is how does the mayo clinic fit into this and do they

know

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> >that their name has been used and abused in order to lend this

[censored]

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> >science some sense of legitimacy?
> >
> >Pretty sad. Science in nutrition is an oxymoron.
> >
> >TC
>
> So how does General Mills benefit from people eating vegtables,
> chicken. fish as opposed to red meat?

What an idiotic question. What dept of General Mills do *you*

work

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

for?

By trashing low-carb they encourage people to continue eating

high

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

carb grains. You know bread, ready to eat cereals, cakes, as in:

Betty Crocker
Big G Cereals
Bisquick
Bugles
Cheerios
Chex
Fruit Snacks
Häagen-Dazs
Hamburger Helper
Lucky Charms
Nature Valley
Pillsbury
Pop Secret
Trix
Wheaties

All brands of General Mills highly-refined highly-processed
sugar-loaded snacks that they sell to your children and mine.

http://www.generalmills.com/corporate/brands/index.aspx

They benefited by 11 billions in net sales in 2004.

http://media.corporate-ir.net/media_files/irol/74/74271/reports/ar2004_

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

final.pdf

They have identified low carb as one of the three major reasons

why

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

they didn't make any more billions in 2004:

"While our earnings results were good overall,
they fell short of our initial expectations for the
year due to three principal factors. First, prices
for a number of key ingredients increased
sharply, and our 2004 commodity costs were
much higher than we planned - over $100 million
above our 2003 expense. Second, the recent
popularity of low-carbohydrate diets slowed
sales in several of our major product categories.
And third, our Bakeries and Foodservice business
fell well short of targeted results in 2004.
Net sales for this business segment declined
2 percent to $1.76 billion and operating profits
of $132 million were down 15 percent. These
results were due in part to the low-carbohydrate
trend and higher supply chain costs. But the
earnings decline in this segment also reflects
disruption caused by our own manufacturing
realignment actions and by decisions to eliminate
low-margin product lines in a number of
categories."

That is a direct quote from their 2004 annual report.

Here is a table from their annual report:

U.S. RETAIL LEADING MARKET POSITIONS
Category Category Our Retail Our Dollar
Dollars in Millions, Fiscal 2004 Sales Sales Growth Sales Growth

Share

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Rank
Ready-to-eat Cereals $7,600 -1% -2% 31% 2
Refrigerated Dough 1,580 -1 -3 69 1
Dessert Mixes 1,470 3 4 38 1
Frozen Baked Goods 900 3 6 21 1
Microwave Popcorn 890 2 6 20 2
Frozen Hot Snacks 850 4 11 26 2
Fruit Snacks 620 4 2 60 1

Does this answer your ridiculous question?

TC

Politics aside, I guess the real question is:

Is too much red meat bad for long-term health?

L.