Mountain Bikes · Public discussion

Cube's 2027 MTB range: Fritzz vs Stereo

Started by coastalrider · · Last activity · 4 posts · 8 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Mountain Bikes
Published
17 August 2026
Last activity
21 August 2026
Original author
coastalrider
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
8
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I've always been a believer in getting the most bang for your buck, which is why I usually hunt for previous-year closeouts on my road bikes. Looking at the announced 2027 MTB range from Cube, I'm seeing a pretty wide spread in value and intent. They've got the Stereo trail platform, the Fritzz enduro, the TWO15 downhill, and the Stereo Hybrid ONE44 eMTB.

    On one end, you have the Stereo HPC Race, which is a 150mm-front and 145mm-rear trail platform priced at £2,199. On the other, the Fritzz C:62 Super TM comes in at £4,999 with 170mm travel, a carbon frame, and mullet wheels. The Fritzz also features a flip chip that allows for either air or coil shocks and weighs 17.2kg.

    As someone who prefers a pragmatic approach to gear, I'm trying to figure out if the jump in price is justifiable for the average rider. The Fritzz is more than double the price of the Stereo HPC Race. For those of us who aren't racing downhill or hitting extreme enduro lines every weekend, does that high-pivot design and extra travel actually provide a noticeable benefit for a 'do-it-all' bike?

    I also noticed the TWO15 is an aluminium high-pivot bike with 200mm rear travel and a Fox 40 fork for £3,999. While that's a beast of a machine, it seems very specialized compared to the trail options.

    Do you think the extra cost of the Fritzz is worth it for someone who primarily rides mixed terrain? Or is the Stereo the smarter value play for most of us? Also, for those who have messed around with high-pivot setups before, does it actually change the ride feel enough to justify the premium over a standard trail bike?

  2. It really depends on where you plan to spend most of your time. For a mixed terrain or do-it-all ride, that Stereo HPC Race seems like the smarter value play. Paying more than double for the Fritzz is a big jump, and unless you are hitting those extreme enduro lines, the extra travel and high-pivot design might be overkill. It is often better to start with a versatile trail platform and see if you actually feel the need for that specialized gear before spending the premium.

  3. That makes a lot of sense. I tend to agree that starting with a versatile platform is the smarter move. Paying more than double for the Fritzz is a massive jump, and if those extreme enduro lines aren't a regular part of the ride, that high-pivot design and extra travel are likely just overkill. It is better to see if the needs actually justify the premium before spending it.

  4. Agreed. Paying double for that kind of travel and a high-pivot design is a huge jump that most riders will never actually use. For flowy woodland trails and general XC riding, all that extra travel just eats your energy and kills the responsiveness. It is much better to stick with a simpler platform and focus on riding skill rather than relying on a heavy, expensive machine to do the work for you.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.