Stage 2 provided a masterclass in timing and explosive finishes. Brennan won the stage ahead of Pau Miquel, with Pogacar taking third place. It was a technical uphill finish that rewarded those who could manage their energy until the final surge. Earlier in the day, Hayter briefly took the provisional race lead before being caught, which allowed Pogacar to keep the red jersey at the end of the stage.
The real tactical point of interest was Van Aert. He launched a significant attack and was caught with Romele before the finish sprint. From a strategic perspective, that kind of move is high risk. When you go solo that early, you are fighting the wind alone while the peloton can organize a chase using a cohesive line. It often leaves a rider empty for the final kick, which is exactly what happened here.
In a race like the Vuelta, the most dangerous moment is often right after a long breakaway is caught, as that is when the winning counter attack launches. Van Aert tried to dictate the terms, but he ended up fading before the final kilometre. It raises a question about the efficiency of his effort versus the reward of the stage win.
Did Van Aert's solo attack hurt his stage win chances, or did it show a capable bonking decision?