Recumbent bicycles · Public discussion

V-REX vs R200

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 5 posts · 919 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Recumbent bicycles
Published
12 March 2005
Last activity
17 March 2005
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
5
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
919
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–5 of 5
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Spring is here. It's the law in this county that I
    have to get a new bent. Actually I'm wondering
    if anyone out there has both a V-rex and an R200 ?
    I have an R200. I don't ride a lot but have
    certainly enjoyed the bike. I'm thinking about
    getting a V-rex (or Giro). Is it different enough
    that I would feel like a had a new bike ? My
    riding is all smooth roads so the suspension
    isn't really an issue.

    thanks

  2. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Spring is here. It's the law in this county that I
    have to get a new bent. Actually I'm wondering
    if anyone out there has both a V-rex and an R200 ?
    I have an R200. I don't ride a lot but have
    certainly enjoyed the bike. I'm thinking about
    getting a V-rex (or Giro). Is it different enough
    that I would feel like a had a new bike ? My
    riding is all smooth roads so the suspension
    isn't really an issue.

    thanks

    From what I've seen with the R200 yes the Rans V-rex or Giro would be a step
    up

  3. Mark:

    I have a V-Rex and of the two I'd probably go for the Giro. They aren't
    different enough that I'd get rid of my Rex to get a Giro, but I have
    invested in making it as close to a Giro as I can (mainly with the
    handlebar/riser setup). I think the Giro is one of the sweetest handling
    bikes around.

    --Scott
    "Mark Leuck" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Spring is here. It's the law in this county that I
    have to get a new bent. Actually I'm wondering
    if anyone out there has both a V-rex and an R200 ?
    I have an R200. I don't ride a lot but have
    certainly enjoyed the bike. I'm thinking about
    getting a V-rex (or Giro). Is it different enough
    that I would feel like a had a new bike ? My
    riding is all smooth roads so the suspension
    isn't really an issue.

    thanks

    From what I've seen with the R200 yes the Rans V-rex or Giro would be a
    step
    up

  4. Where do you live? Any good engineering jobs nearby? I want to move.
    Here in Erie, PA smooth roads are what they managed to rebuild this summer
    once the repeated frost heaves make the joke of calling them "roads" not
    even funny anymore.
    Those new roads become crummy over the next winter, where some madman
    decides which "roads" are the worst and need to get rebuilt over the summer.

    As they say, in Erie, there are four seasons:
    almost winter
    winter
    still winter
    and construction.

    TrailBarge

    <<SNIP>>
    My

    Quoted message said:

    riding is all smooth roads so the suspension
    isn't really an issue.

    thanks

  5. I did have both of them for a couple of years, but sold the R200 last
    summer. The V-Rex was decidedly my favorite of the two, even though I had
    to outfit it with low-pressure 1.75" tires (56psi Continental Top Touring
    2000s) because I ride on various kinds of trails and sidewalks, etc., that
    aren't so smooth, and the ride was a bit jolting. But even with the
    low-pressure tires the V-Rex was faster than the R200, and with hi-pressure
    skinnies it completely blows it away.

    Not that speed necessarily matters so much (unless you're trying to keep up
    with a group that's faster than you). But I simply enjoyed riding the V-Rex
    much more. Seemed like the Bontrager hubs on the R200 were noisy and higher
    resistance. On the V-Rex you can backpedal to get your feet set properly
    for starts. You can tilt the seat back farther to get even less wind
    resistance (and for my tastes, greater comfort). It takes a kickstand and a
    rear rack much more gracefully. It just felt better. The R200 has a
    beautiful frame that looks like it would withstand ramming a Volvo, but the
    V-Rex was a better ride. Plus I didn't like having to mess with the
    pressure in the air shock. Maybe that wouldn't have been a issue if I'd been
    riding it all the time, but it seemed like every time I got around to riding
    it I had to pump up the air shock in addition to the tires. Who needs it -
    just give me a spring!

    In fairness, I never got motivated to really work on the R200 to overcome
    it's little problems and get it outfitted just right. I had already done
    that with the V-Rex, and the R200 didn't hold out enough of a promise of
    something better to get me off my rear. I don't doubt that those who *have*
    invested that time in their R200s have made something better out of them
    than I did out of mine.

    Greg D

    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Spring is here. It's the law in this county that I
    have to get a new bent. Actually I'm wondering
    if anyone out there has both a V-rex and an R200 ?
    I have an R200. I don't ride a lot but have
    certainly enjoyed the bike. I'm thinking about
    getting a V-rex (or Giro). Is it different enough
    that I would feel like a had a new bike ? My
    riding is all smooth roads so the suspension
    isn't really an issue.

    thanks

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.