Mountain Bikes · Public discussion

18hr Bra....Ride in Fruity town.

Started by TJ · · Last activity · 4 posts · 406 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Mountain Bikes
Published
30 April 2005
Last activity
5 May 2005
Original author
TJ
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
406
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. http://forums.mtbr.com/showthread.php?t=97282

    We have a race now that lasts as long as your bra.

    TJ

  2. Some bra's are longer than others...I don't like mine too long...but
    too short aren't any good either....

  3. "Dave W" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "TJ" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    http://forums.mtbr.com/showthread.php?t=97282

    We have a race now that lasts as long as your bra.

    TJ

    Could someone please enlighten me as to how they planned to contain the
    widespread, wanton destruction that is a 24 hr event. (so we've been led
    to believe on this NG, and elsewhere) Would it be because it is billed as
    and 18 hr event as opposed to a 24 hr event? Is there some scientific
    study that proves that the actual trail destruction really occurs in the
    last 6 hrs of a 24 hr event? Thus none would be had, since they nixed
    those particular 6 hrs out. What if they picked the wrong 6 hrs? What if
    the damage occurs in the "first" 6 hrs? Hrs 12 to 18?

    Seems the area that leads in advocacy (or at least is the most vocal) is
    not setting the best example. Bear in mind this is coming from someone on
    the outside looking in, so I have no idea, thus the questions....

    Dave (I'm just saying...)

    You would have to see it to understand. A model of how it should be
    handled.

    TJ

  4. "TJ" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Dave W" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "TJ" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    http://forums.mtbr.com/showthread.php?t=97282

    We have a race now that lasts as long as your bra.

    TJ

    Could someone please enlighten me as to how they planned to contain the
    widespread, wanton destruction that is a 24 hr event. (so we've been led
    to believe on this NG, and elsewhere) Would it be because it is billed as
    and 18 hr event as opposed to a 24 hr event? Is there some scientific
    study that proves that the actual trail destruction really occurs in the
    last 6 hrs of a 24 hr event? Thus none would be had, since they nixed
    those particular 6 hrs out. What if they picked the wrong 6 hrs? What if
    the damage occurs in the "first" 6 hrs? Hrs 12 to 18?

    Seems the area that leads in advocacy (or at least is the most vocal) is
    not setting the best example. Bear in mind this is coming from someone on
    the outside looking in, so I have no idea, thus the questions....

    Dave (I'm just saying...)

    You would have to see it to understand. A model of how it should be
    handled.

    TJ

    pics at MTBEER?

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.