rec.sport.unicycling · Public discussion

Re: Coker crank size for hills

Started by hedge · · Last activity · 7 posts · 289 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
rec.sport.unicycling
Published
2 May 2005
Last activity
4 May 2005
Original author
hedge
Posts
7
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
289
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–7 of 7
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Thanks for the input. I plan on getting a brake for sure. I'm looking
    at a GB4 frame with Airfoil rim/UDC hub wheelset. I'll start with 150mm
    cranks and see how it goes.

    The GB4 looks like a quality frame. Most of the pics that I see of
    Cokers use the stock frame but I wanted brake mounts out of the box.
    Any comments on the GB4 vs stock frame?

    --
    hedge - Vet Rider
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    hedge's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/7450
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/40034

  2. I had a 29 with 125s then got a Coker with 150s, if anything I found the
    Coker slightly easier due to the increased momentum in the wheel. If I
    hit a short hill quickly enough I only really need to work towards the
    top, whereas on the 29 I'd be working almost all the way up.

    If you work out the ratio of crank length to wheel radius for a 29 with
    125s and a Coker with 150s the numbers are very close, 2.98 and 2.93
    respectively, so a Coker with 150s should feel relatively familiar if a
    little heavier.

    I've just switched to 125s on the Coker and it's definitely harder work
    on the hills, but I think I'll get used to that in time.

    Good luck with the new Uni

    Paul

    --
    paul royle - gravitationally challenged
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    paul royle's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/5572
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/40034

  3. paul royle said:

    If you work out the ratio of crank length to wheel radius for a 29 with
    125s and a Coker with 150s the numbers are very close, 2.98 and 2.93
    respectively, so a Coker with 150s should feel relatively familiar if a
    little heavier.

    You probably mean the other way around: ratio of wheel radius to crank
    length. The again, by my calculation, the numbers are 2.95 and 3.05
    respectively. Still quite close though.

    However, as to feeling familiar, there is of course more to how you
    'feel' a unicycle than just the wheel-radius-to-crank-length ratio.

    Klaas Bil - Newsgroup Addict
    --
    "When it comes to the family jewels, you won't be having fun until they're having fun. - Jake D"

  4. My Qu-ax 36" unicycle (Coker? See 'this thread'
    (http://tinyurl.com/d2vfj) ) came with 150s on it which I tried but they
    were too long for me so I quickly changed them to 125s. I'm happy with
    the 125s for now but I'll probably go shorter when I'm more used to it.
    The only time when longer cranks would be of benefit for me would be
    downhill but I'm getting a brake for that.

    I think leg length has a significant role to play in crank length
    preference but I'm not sure why, it's just a hunch. BTW I have fairly
    short legs and use 125s for Muni also.

    --
    unicus

    Every time I try to write my signature the pen slips on the monitor.
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    unicus's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/869
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/40034

  5. unicus said:

    *I think leg length has a significant role to play in crank length
    preference but I'm not sure why, it's just a hunch. BTW I have fairly
    short legs and use 125s for Muni also. *

    A little bit off-topic, but on a bike people with short legs often
    prefer to use shorter cranks, in proportion to the length of their legs.
    Mass-prduced bikes (even a lot of children's bikes) almost always come
    with 170 or 175mm cranks, which are far too long to be comfortable for
    shorter people. But on a bike you can compensate for the lack of torque
    of the shorter cranks by gearing lower and pedalling faster. On a
    unicycle shorter cranks means you need stronger legs - but saying that,
    shorter cyclists do tend to be good climbers.

    I mostly ride a 26x3 with 165s, and I can't imagine using anything much
    shorter even with that wheel size - up hill is fine unless it gets
    _really_ steep, but going down some even fairly steep hills (nothing
    extreme, just 1:6 or so roads) I'm struggling to hold it back. I would
    say I have fairly strong legs, but then I've been a cyclist all my life
    and only took up unicycling just over a year ago, so perhaps I just
    haven't developed the "backwards pedalling" muscles enough. I'm tempted
    to have a go with a coker, but I think I'd need brakes for the
    descents!

    Rob

    --
    rob.northcott - OK as long as it's not too windy
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    rob.northcott's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/7436
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/40034

  6. The answer to this question depends a lot on how much riding you're
    going to do and how fast you want to go on the flat.

    If you ride a lot you'll get stronger legs and be able to ride with
    shorter cranks. If you want to ride really fast on the flat you have to
    ride a lot and short cranks will really help your speed.

    I've got 110 cranks on the coker. Without brakes you can ride down 1 in
    7 hills but it's hard work once it's that steep. If you've not got a
    brake downhill is the big thing that is hard. I ride a lot though (10
    miles most weekdays plus long rides at weekends), so I can ride more
    than most people.

    It also depends a bit on how hilly you mean by hilly, if you mean 10,000
    feet mountains and massive ascents then you might want really long
    cranks, you might even want 170s or something. If you mean rolling hills
    and nothing about 1000 feet, you could probably learn to use shorter
    cranks just fine.

    Whatever happens, riding with 150 cranks is probably a good start, then
    moving down after you've ridden a few hundred miles if you feel you're
    needing a bit more speed.

    Joe

    --
    joemarshall - dumb blonde
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    joemarshall's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/1545
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/40034

  7. Thanks again guys for all your comments. I have nothing extreme here as
    far as hills go (2000-3000ft peak elevations) and roads can have climbs
    of 1000ft or so over a few miles distance. I plan to stay mostly away
    from crossing over the mountians sticking to the rolling hills in the
    lower areas. There you may run into some short but steep hills. I have
    ridden a 29" uni w/ 125s on all of these roads no problem without a
    brake. I have very strong legs and have good endurance I've just never
    experienced a Coker before. I'll start out with 150mm cranks to get
    used to the uni then tweak it as needed. I'll see how it goes without a
    brake at first. I've been riding so long without brakes and like going
    down hills as it works your legs the opposite way.

    I just know that riding the Coker is going to be the coolest thing since
    learning to ride. Can't wait!!!

    Looks like unicycle.com is out of stock of the Airfoil rim version. Any
    other source for these?

    --
    hedge - Vet Rider
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    hedge's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/7450
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/40034

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.