1,367 dead since "Bring 'em on" Bush taunt (8

"john"
wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

John Agosta said:

"john"

wrote in message

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

John Agosta wrote:

>"E. (Bet) Anthony"

wrote in message

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

>news:[email hidden]...
>
>
>>John Agosta wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>"E. (Bet) Anthony"

wrote in message

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

>>>news:[email hidden]...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>John Agosta wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>"E. (Bet) Anthony"

wrote in message

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

>>>>>news:[email hidden]...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>John Agosta wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>What's your point ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>You make it seem like events similar to 911 were weekly

occurances.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

>>>>>>>FYI, spinner - there has been nothing 'similar' to 911 since
>>>>>>>the beginning of time. That's_beginning_of_time.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Bush's policies, and the Iraqi war have nothing to do with no

repeat

Quoted message said:

>of
>
>
>>>>>911.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>What do you attribute it to?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Attribute "what" to ?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>(no repeats of 911)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Listen carefully:
>>>
>>>911 like events were not a daily, weekly, monthly, or yearly

occurance.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

>>>Therefore, Bush's policies has nothing to do with the fact that 911

like

Quoted message said:

>>>events
>>>have not happened again.
>>>
>>
>>If Bush's policies has nothing to do with preventing more 911 type
>>events, what do you believe is the reason that there has not been
>>another attack like 911?
>
>
>
>Are you unable to read?
>
>911 like events have not occurred since the first time because they

were

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

not

Quoted message said:

>regular occurances
>to begin with, you dolt!
>
>Instead of trying to reason that Bush has prevented additional 911's

from

Quoted message said:

>happening,
>you should consider that Bush allowed to first one to happen by

dismissing

Quoted message said:

>the intell he
>has received prior to the event.

Prey tell how could Bush could prevent the training of the 911

terrorists?

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Prey tell how Bush and his administration completely blew it regarding
hints, suggestions, and conections, leading up to the 911 attacks.

Clueless Clinton was totally in the dark while the terrorists were
planning and training for 911.

Quoted message said:

But that's beyond the discussion. The discussion is that somehow,

Bush's

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

policies
has somehow prevented another 911 like attack from happening.

Complete poppy-[censored].

The fact that there has not been another 911 attack is proof enough that
Bush's policies are working.

If 911-like events were monthly occurances, then I'd agree with you.
But, they never were. Therefore, it is illogical to suggest that Bush's
policies have prented another 911.
If anything, it is more logical to say that his administration sleeping at
the wheel could take a lot of the blame
for it happening in the first place.

How is the air down there in the hole you're keeping your head in?