Australia and New Zealand · Public discussion

Anyone doing Hell of the West?

Started by mogulhead · · Last activity · 12 posts · 892 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Australia and New Zealand
Published
30 May 2005
Last activity
2 June 2005
Original author
mogulhead
Posts
12
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
892
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–12 of 12
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. The Course: CCCC’s version of the Paris-Roubaix Classic on the private roads (No traffic & no centre line rule!) of the AARC. Seniors race on a course featuring a 4.2 km sealed loop and a 7km loop containing a 1.5km 5% climb and a 1km hard packed dirt section.
    A Grade 100km – 10 flat laps & 8 hill loop laps
    B Grade 85km – 9 flat laps & 7 hill loop laps
    C Grade 70km – 7 flat laps & 6 hill loop laps
    D Grade 60km – 6 flat laps & 5 hill loop laps
    Junior racing on a separate flat 3.2km fully sealed circuit
    Wet weather: the roads of the AARC are safe in all weather, and the race will proceed in all but the most extreme conditions. Race day weather updates on 0400 125 425.
    Important Notes: For security and safety, access to the complex will be available between 11am and 12.15pm ONLY.
    Car drivers must obey all traffic signs within the AARC, wear seat belts and observe the 60kmh speed limit. Park only where indicated by CCCC officials.
    No littering tolerated – including competitors!
    Detailed directions and maps at www.carnegiecycling.com.au
    Further details: [email hidden] or 0409 541 136

    That 1km of dirt section could become interesting in a bunch if it rains heaps.

    Cheers

  2. mogulhead said:


    The Course: CCCC’s version of the Paris-Roubaix Classic on the private
    roads (No traffic & no centre line rule!) of the AARC. Seniors race on
    a course featuring a 4.2 km sealed loop and a 7km loop containing a
    1.5km 5% climb and a 1km hard packed dirt section.

    For the benefit of the viewers at home, the AARC is the
    Anglesea proving grounds I believe. Down on the
    west coast of Victoria, close(ish) to Torquay.

  3. Carl Brewer said:

    On Mon, 30 May 2005 17:53:49 +1000, mogulhead

    Quoted message said:


    The Course: CCCC’s version of the Paris-Roubaix Classic on the private
    roads (No traffic & no centre line rule!) of the AARC. Seniors race on
    a course featuring a 4.2 km sealed loop and a 7km loop containing a
    1.5km 5% climb and a 1km hard packed dirt section.

    For the benefit of the viewers at home, the AARC is the
    Anglesea proving grounds I believe. Down on the
    west coast of Victoria, close(ish) to Torquay.

    You may also need to be a member of one of the clubs specified as being in the 'combine'......I mean seeing as CCCC have put this up against an 'open' & all, that'll be the only way they'll be allowed to run it...although the powers that be at CCCC haven't made this clear in their 'flyers'...check if you're eligble before you lob

    Hitchy

  4. How do you find out what combine your club is in. I'm with Footscray Cycling Club and they don't have a race scheduled for the weekend so they said on there web site to try this race or the Preston one. I really don't like this new rule and wouldn't mind some one explaining what cyclesport victoria hope to achieve by it.

    Cheers

  5. mogulhead said:

    How do you find out what combine your club is in. I'm with Footscray Cycling Club and they don't have a race scheduled for the weekend so they said on there web site to try this race or the Preston one. I really don't like this new rule and wouldn't mind some one explaining what cyclesport victoria hope to achieve by it.

    Cheers

    If you do manage to find out what CSV are trying to achieve.....perhaps you could let the rest of us in on it as well!.....you be Ok for this race if you're with Footscray...they are one of the annointed 10 in this weeks 'combine of convenience'

    hitchy

  6. CSV are doing this to force riders to race opens, so that they get the
    revinue from entry fees. Probably not productive in the long term.

  7. "Bleve" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    CSV are doing this to force riders to race opens, so that they get the
    revinue from entry fees. Probably not productive in the long term.

    CCCC have a survey on the issue on the website. Currently 91% do not support
    it.

    Are the clubs doing anything about it?

  8. Bob said:


    "Bleve" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    CSV are doing this to force riders to race opens, so that they get the
    revinue from entry fees. Probably not productive in the long term.

    CCCC have a survey on the issue on the website. Currently 91% do not support
    it.

    Are the clubs doing anything about it?

    I was at a Blackburn coaching meeting two weeks ago, and
    we (BBN) are proposing an alternative that can still
    provide CSV with revinue but not kill off the smaller
    clubs in Victoria - that's the rough idea anyway, so "yes"

  9. Carl Brewer said:


    I was at a Blackburn coaching meeting two weeks ago, and
    we (BBN) are proposing an alternative that can still
    provide CSV with revinue but not kill off the smaller
    clubs in Victoria - that's the rough idea anyway, so "yes"

    The revenue argument is [censored] though. Unless you're racing B grade club/combine you're going to get caned in an Open. So by restricting the places you can race in the early years gives you less opportunity to learn the sport and its complexities. And less riders means less people at Opens in the long run. Less clubs at each club race means that you get crappy racing, with less than 10 people in a grade, or C&D and A&B combined races, which once again is no fun and deters people from the sport. (I don't mind not winning, but if you're dropped 50km from the end, winter road racing is a [censored] sport.

    The other factor is that anyone who's out of town (ie. country people in Melb, Melb people in country for work) can;t get a race in. Whereas I've raced at Echuca one season, Latrobe Valley another, all becuase that was where the work took me. It's only a small thing, but it kept me racing, which these new rules won't.

    I'm not sure what they're trying to achieve, perhaps there was some insurance reason for it?

  10. Shabby said:


    Carl Brewer said:


    I was at a Blackburn coaching meeting two weeks ago, and
    we (BBN) are proposing an alternative that can still
    provide CSV with revinue but not kill off the smaller
    clubs in Victoria - that's the rough idea anyway, so "yes"

    The revenue argument is [censored] though. Unless you're racing B grade
    club/combine you're going to get caned in an Open. So by restricting
    the places you can race in the early years gives you less opportunity
    to learn the sport and its complexities. And less riders means less
    people at Opens in the long run. Less clubs at each club race means
    that you get crappy racing, with less than 10 people in a grade, or C&D
    and A&B combined races, which once again is no fun and deters people
    from the sport. (I don't mind not winning, but if you're dropped 50km
    from the end, winter road racing is a [censored] sport.

    Exactly. It also kills off the smaller clubs who don't have
    the numbers to be worth inviting if you can only invite 10
    clubs.

    Quoted message said:

    The other factor is that anyone who's out of town (ie. country people
    in Melb, Melb people in country for work) can;t get a race in. Whereas
    I've raced at Echuca one season, Latrobe Valley another, all becuase
    that was where the work took me. It's only a small thing, but it kept
    me racing, which these new rules won't.

    Yep.

    Quoted message said:

    I'm not sure what they're trying to achieve, perhaps there was some
    insurance reason for it?

    I received the following, I don't think it's confidental, they (CSV)
    said they were going to post it on their website :

    Club and Combine Racing Winter 2005

    May 2005

    The Board of CycleSport Victoria have received several emails and
    letters concerning the memo released last month in relation to club
    and combine racing. We thankyou for your feedback and present this
    note to help clarify some points, hopefully to answer some of the
    consistent questions which have been raised over the past couple of
    weeks.

    These regulations have been developed for the Winter road season of
    2005 and indeed there will be some alterations made when the focus is
    shifted towards the 2005/06 summer season. The ‘club’ criterium format
    here in Melbourne as it exists at present needs to be addressed and
    the Board will begin to look at this situation over the next couple of
    months. In the meantime it welcomes any feedback and suggestions from
    clubs and riders on the regulations being put in place and how they
    are applied to the summer season, in particular to criterium racing.
    We encourage our clubs and members to look at the broader picture and
    keep in mind that the sport of cycling, as in the case of any sport,
    cannot function without a state body.

    Whilst the reasons for implementing this racing policy are not purely
    financial and take into account a number of factors, a major income
    stream for this organisation is open racing. Victorian Cycling will
    this road season witness its best road season for many years with
    increased prizemoney, bigger, better tours and an increased number of
    opens. The Victorian Road Championship has needed a boost for some
    time and in 2005 will now attract $10,000 in prizemoney. CycleSport
    Victoria is a self funded, not for profit organisation which runs to a
    tight budget. If open racing and the promoters of open racing are not
    supported by the clubs and riders then these events are placed in
    jeopardy, the end result being that these events would disappear from
    our calendar and CSV close its doors.

    The limit of ten affiliated clubs does not extend to interstate
    riders. Riders from interstate are permitted to ride events here in
    Victoria provided that the hosting club has approved their
    participation in the event. This would also apply to riders registered
    in the ADF (Australian Defence Force) club, because it is affiliated
    directly with Cycling Australia.

    For the majority of clubs and cyclists this policy will result in very
    little change. The Board would encourage clubs hosting combine events
    to invite clubs based in their geographic region, not to exclude a
    club based on their size. The Board would encourage those clubs to
    then pool their resources and manpower. CSV will continue to monitor
    the policy and the implementation of it and if there are particular
    clubs being greatly inconvenienced, then there will be steps made to
    rectify that issue. If a member feels that their racing situation
    warrants particular consideration by the Board then they can put their
    case forward in writing with each to be addressed on its merits.

    CycleSport Victoria Board of Management

  11. Shabby said:
    Carl Brewer said:


    I was at a Blackburn coaching meeting two weeks ago, and
    we (BBN) are proposing an alternative that can still
    provide CSV with revinue but not kill off the smaller
    clubs in Victoria - that's the rough idea anyway, so "yes"

    The revenue argument is [censored] though. Unless you're racing B grade
    club/combine you're going to get caned in an Open.

    remember some opens are handicaps and some are graded, not all are free
    for alls in the one grade. Having said that, I no longer race opens,
    as, say I enter the Tour of the Valley in C grade, I see guys and say
    "hey, don't you ususally race A grade" and we all know what happens
    after that.

    [snip]

  12. email hidden said:
    Shabby said:
    Carl Brewer said:


    I was at a Blackburn coaching meeting two weeks ago, and
    we (BBN) are proposing an alternative that can still
    provide CSV with revinue but not kill off the smaller
    clubs in Victoria - that's the rough idea anyway, so "yes"

    The revenue argument is [censored] though. Unless you're racing B grade
    club/combine you're going to get caned in an Open.

    remember some opens are handicaps and some are graded, not all are free
    for alls in the one grade. Having said that, I no longer race opens,
    as, say I enter the Tour of the Valley in C grade, I see guys and say
    "hey, don't you ususally race A grade" and we all know what happens
    after that.

    Sandbaggers .. yes. What we need is a system similar to that which
    the yanks use, with a grading system that's centralised and formerlly
    managed.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.