Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Re: Bike Lane vs Wide outside Lane - benefit to AUTOS?

Started by Chip C · · Last activity · 6 posts · 405 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
5 June 2005
Last activity
7 June 2005
Original author
Chip C
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
405
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Quoted message said:

    FWIW, both bike lanes and wide outside lanes share problems with
    potential right-hook collisions. Where they exist, perhaps there should
    be a "right-turn yield to bikes" sign?

    Am I right on, or am I missing something?

    Such a sign would only encourage the very common sight of a stream of
    bikes overtaking and passing a car on the right even as it's half-way
    into a right turn. If you're thinking that this is a safe and legal way
    to mix bikes and cars, I think you're missing something.

    If you're getting your sign painting kit out, whip up some of these:

    "bike lane ends - bikes and cars merge"
    "all vehicles merge right before turning"
    "through traffic must pass on left"

    Chip C
    Toronto

  2. (PeteCresswell) said:

    What is the defense?

    snip

    Quoted message said:


    What is there to do when somebody makes such an impulsive move? Seems like
    there's less than a second between 'business as usual' and the situation
    reaching it's climax.

    The countermeasure is to ride further into the lane. This compels most
    motorists to be more cautious (slow down, wait behind, change lanes,
    etc.) or to have to swing wide to make a right turn in front of you. If
    they want to do it, they can, but they have to really work for it. Also,
    if you are further out, you then have leeway to your right to do a Quick
    Right in the eventuality that you need it.

    People can mariginalize bicyclists in spite of your best efforts if they
    really want to. The point is to reduce the incidence by controlling
    motorists to the extent that you can.

    I've had a couple of motorists over the years screech their tires
    rushing to turn in front of me. But their idiocy is more annoyance than
    real danger (assuming they are competent in their maneuver) because I
    can handle everything they throw at me short of purposefully hitting me
    from behind.

    Wayne

  3. Wayne Pein said:

    I've had a couple of motorists over the years screech their tires
    rushing to turn in front of me. But their idiocy is more annoyance
    than real danger (assuming they are competent in their maneuver)
    because I can handle everything they throw at me short of
    purposefully hitting me from behind.

    This is my point. I don't find it difficult to avoid these situations, by
    riding defensively. If a car comes by me and starts to turn, I can always hit
    my brakes -- unless I'm going too fast.

    A *car* can't do a right hook at 20 MPH either.

    Oncoming traffic making a left turn into you is a much greater danger, IMO.

    Matt O.

  4. Per Matt O'Toole:

    Quoted message said:

    This is why you shouldn't be going 16-20 MPH where you could get right-hooked.
    I consider right-hook near misses to be a lack of defensive riding on the
    cyclist's part.

    What is the defense? Some months ago, somebody almost nailed me - and
    looking back on it, I can't figure out what I could have done to prevent it
    short of riding on the sidewalk and stopping at every intersection/exit lane
    (which I often do - MTB and all that....)

    This one was a clapped-out 1980-something sedan wearing hair curlers, and
    sucking on a cigarette - probably late for an appearance on Jerry Springer.

    Traffic was steady - but moderate - giving her room to punch it in an effort to
    dive into that turn ahead of me.

    What is there to do when somebody makes such an impulsive move? Seems like
    there's less than a second between 'business as usual' and the situation
    reaching it's climax.
    --
    PeteCresswell

  5. Per Wayne Pein:

    Quoted message said:

    because I
    can handle everything they throw at me short of purposefully hitting me
    from behind.

    Don't rule that out. I've witnessed it. Chased the guy in my car until I
    could flag down a cop. Guy told his story to the cop....got off scott free -
    not even a ticket.

    The biker escaped with bruises and a banged-up bike.

    But now there's one more headjob driving around that knows he can do that with
    impunity.
    --
    PeteCresswell

  6. Matt O'Toole said:
    Wayne Pein said:

    I've had a couple of motorists over the years screech their tires
    rushing to turn in front of me. But their idiocy is more annoyance
    than real danger (assuming they are competent in their maneuver)
    because I can handle everything they throw at me short of
    purposefully hitting me from behind.

    This is my point. I don't find it difficult to avoid these situations, by
    riding defensively. If a car comes by me and starts to turn, I can always hit
    my brakes -- unless I'm going too fast.

    A *car* can't do a right hook at 20 MPH either.

    Generally true at right angle intersections.

    Quoted message said:

    Oncoming traffic making a left turn into you is a much greater danger, IMO.

    Yea, the Left Cross tends to be more serious because of the higher speed
    of impact. On the other hand, you can see it coming, and the
    countermeasure is essentially the same as for Right Hook.

    Wayne

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.