General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Research shows metabolic benefits of low-carb diet

Started by TC · · Last activity · 1 post · 365 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
27 June 2005
Last activity
27 June 2005
Original author
TC
Posts
1
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
365
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–1 of 1
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. http://www.bakeryandsnacks.com/news/news-ng.asp?n=60880-research-shows-metabolic

    Research shows metabolic benefits of low-carb diet

    27/06/2005 - The high-protein, low-carb approach to weight loss has
    been underpinned by new research from Australia showing that it can
    provide overweight women with greater nutritional and metabolic
    benefits than a high-carbohydrate diet, reports Jess Halliday.

    Despite the erstwhile popularity of low-carb diets like Atkins,
    interest has tailed off in the past 18 months, with dire consequences
    for food companies that had sought to satisfy the appetite of devotees
    for convenient low-carb products.
    Rather, dieters are veering towards low-glycemic diets, which do not
    advocate cutting out all carbohydrates but instead focus on those that
    release energy into the blood stream slowly, such as oats, whole
    grains, most fruits, vegetables, nuts and legumes.

    Carbohydrates that are rapidly digested and that raise blood sugar and
    insulin to high levels, such as white bread, refined breakfast cereals
    and concentrated sugars, are discouraged.

    For the study published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
    (2005 81: 1253-1254), researchers at the Commonwealth Scientific and
    Industrial Research Organisation in Adelaide randomly assigned 100
    overweight or obese women aged 40 to 58 years, with a body mass index
    of between 28 and 38, to one of two isocaloric 5600kJ diets for a
    12-week period.

    The diets were in parallel design, but one was high-protein and the
    other high-carbohydrate.

    The participants in both groups achieved the same weight loss success,
    of between 7.0 and 7.6 kg, and both also experienced a decrease in
    LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, glucose, insulin, free fatty acid,
    and C-reactive protein concentrations with weight loss.

    Folate and vitamin B-6 levels increased with both diets.

    But the benefits of the high-protein diet were evident in participants
    with high serum triacylglycerol (a risk factor for atherosclerosis and
    coronary heart disease), who lost more fat mass on the high-protein
    diet than on the high-carbohydrate diet (5.7 to 7.1kg and 2.7 to 4.1kg
    respectively).

    Triacylglycerol concentrations decreased more in both high- and normal-
    serum triacylglycerol patients with the high-protein diet than with the
    high-carbohydrate diet.

    Serum vitamin B-12 levels also increased 9 percent with the
    high-protein diet and decreased 13 percent with the high-carbohydrate
    diet.

    "An energy-restricted, high-protein, low-fat diet provides
    nutritional and metabolic benefits that are equal to and sometimes
    greater than those observed with a high-carbohydrate diet," concluded
    the researchers.

    In March of this year the leading low-carb diet company Atkins
    Nutritionals announced that it was shutting down operations in the UK,
    which had been its biggest European market, amid claims that although
    more than 3 million Britons tried the diet in 2004, most had difficulty
    in sticking to it.

    Atkins has also recently incorporated a glycemic measurement into its
    program and reformulated some of its products in a move that makes it
    closer aligned with its main competitor the South Beach Diet, an early
    low-glycemic proponent.

    Other companies whose financials have been hit by the low-carb fall-out
    include NBTY's US wholesale division, whose sales fell four percent
    in 2Q 2005 (also said to be a consequence of negative reports about
    vitamin E), and natural foods distributor Tree of Life, the North
    American subsidiary of Wessanen, which announced restructuring measures
    in February to raise $15 million to offset falling sales of low-carb
    products.

    But whether the new study will be enough to woo consumers back to the
    straight low-carb approach is doubtful. Its scope as not significantly
    wide to assess the relative benefits of low-glycemic carbohydrates,
    whereas low-g has been validated by research into its effect on insulin
    sensitivity as a means to reduce the risk or control the management of
    diseases such as diabetes and heart disease.

    Food marketers and retailers have been quick to board the low-g
    bandwagon. UK supermarket Tesco has published a booklet explaining the
    diet to consumers and has started labeling some of its foods
    'low-GI' or 'medium-GI'.

    But some voices in the scientific community have risen against the
    trend, saying that not enough research has been carried out amongst
    mainstream dieters.

    "I remain skeptical for the broader use of the GI as a weight-loss
    diet label. A low GI diet is extremely hard to adhere to, and there
    have not been sufficiently large or controlled studies in free living
    individuals in order to promote its use, Professor Tom Sanders of
    King's College London told NutraIngredients-USA.com's sister site,
    BakeryAndSnacks.com.

    -----

    TC

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.