General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Re: A vote for Mark

Started by Hawki63 · · Last activity · 12 posts · 426 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
16 July 2003
Last activity
18 July 2003
Original author
Hawki63
Posts
12
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
426
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–12 of 12
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: A vote for Mark
    From: "rb" [email hidden]
    Date: 7/15/2003 4:11 PM Pacifi

    Quoted message said:

    'm still waiting to know how much the surgeons got paid who performed
    the dangerous heart surgery on your husband. Why don't you tell me
    that? --rb

    Quoted message said:


    and that matters ...why?? besides being none of your business...you being an
    altie would never consider having life saving surgery...shucks just break out
    the chelation [censored]...

    anyhoo....I warned the good surgeon that "rb" was after him....ohhhhhhhhh

    maroon...

    plagarize again...???

    hawki

  2. "Hawki63" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: A vote for Mark
    From: "rb" [email hidden]
    Date: 7/15/2003 4:11 PM Pacifi

    Quoted message said:

    'm still waiting to know how much the surgeons got paid who performed
    the dangerous heart surgery on your husband. Why don't you tell me
    that? --rb

    Quoted message said:


    and that matters ...why??

    Gee Whiz dearie,....it's not like i'm asking you to send nude photos of
    yourself to the board! Whats so secret about how much your hubby's heart
    surgery really cost unless the price is so high you're too embarrassed to
    admit just how expensive these conventional treatments really are?--rb

    besides being none of your business...you being an

    Quoted message said:

    altie would never consider having life saving surgery...shucks just break


    out

    Quoted message said:

    the chelation [censored]...

    anyhoo....I warned the good surgeon that "rb" was after him....ohhhhhhhhh

    maroon...

    plagarize again...???

    hawki

  3. Mark Probert said:

    chutzpah

    Careful, Mark. Words like that might identify you as a "New Yorker".
    (Wink, wink, know what I mean?)

    --
    Peter Bowditch [email hidden]
    The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
    The Green Light http://www.ratbags.com/greenlight

  4. "Hawki63" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: A vote for Mark
    From: "rb" [email hidden]
    Date: 7/16/2003 10:24 AM Pacific Daylight Time

    Quoted message said:

    Whats so secret about how much your hubby's heart
    surgery really cost unless the price is so high you're too embarrassed to
    admit just how expensive these conventional treatments really are?--rb

    actually rubber balls...it was truly a bargain at any cost!!!

    Still too high to mention huh. But then again didn't you mention your
    husband was one of these sellers for the drug companies! Did he sell so many
    useless and dangerous drugs that they basically gave him a free surgery? No
    wonder you're so coy.--rb

    Quoted message said:


    the guy looks and feels oh....maybe 48 and he's pushing 64...you should be


    so

    Quoted message said:

    handsome....

    They've got him now. It's only a matter of time before these anti
    cholesterol drugs he's taking will wreck his liver and kidney's if his
    arteries don't clog up again first in 5 or 6 years time! --rb

    Quoted message said:


    still waiting for YOUR explanation of EECP,,,which we all know you haven't


    a

    Quoted message said:

    clue about...

    You tell us all why chelation doesn't work again. We all want to have a
    great laugh. We're fun people you know.--rb

    Quoted message said:


    funny tho...that it IS EVILLLLL mainstream medicine,,,,also VERRRRYYY
    expensive...not one of your ditzy alt no/remedies...

    It's not very expensive at all compared to cabg's etc. It will be though if
    ever the pro meds get their greedy grubby hands on it.--rb

    Quoted message said:

    maroon...

    hawki

    hawki

  5. Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: A vote for Mark
    From: "rb" [email hidden]
    Date: 7/16/2003 4:32 PM Pacific Daylight Time
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    then again didn't you mention your
    husband was one of these sellers for the drug companies! Did he sell so many

    nope never a drug rep...."devices" are entirely different animals...not that
    one such as you would know the difference...

    Quoted message said:

    useless and dangerous drugs that they basically gave him a free surgery? No
    wonder you're so coy.--rb

    that is so stupid you show yourself up...."surgeons" do surgery....not drug
    companies you loon....plus then there are the hospital
    bills,,,anesthesia...etc...maroon..

    Quoted message said:

    You tell us all why chelation doesn't work again. We all want to have a
    great laugh. We're fun people you know.--rb

    no...you tell US why it does???? got that angiographic proof yet??? NOT

    Quoted message said:

    It's not very expensive at all

    oh???? and you know that how???

    actually EECP is done in 6 week,,three times a week increments...costs about
    $1500 per treatment...can you multiply that high??? doubt it..."symptomatic
    relief" only ditzball...

    Quoted message said:

    compared to cabg's etc. It will be though if
    ever the pro meds get their greedy grubby hands on it.--rb

    OK..multiply the above figures and you get WAY less than a cabg.....and the
    EECP's joints I have visited ARE run by pro meds...cardiologists to be
    exact...Medicare requires REAL docs be in charge of such treatment...

    again...rubber balls...YOUR explanation please???

    maroon.....
    hawki

  6. "Hawki63" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: A vote for Mark
    From: "rb" [email hidden]
    Date: 7/16/2003 4:32 PM Pacific Daylight Time
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    then again didn't you mention your
    husband was one of these sellers for the drug companies! Did he sell so


    many

    Quoted message said:


    nope never a drug rep...."devices" are entirely different animals...not


    that

    Quoted message said:

    one such as you would know the difference...

    Quoted message said:

    useless and dangerous drugs that they basically gave him a free surgery?


    No

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    wonder you're so coy.--rb

    that is so stupid you show yourself up...."surgeons" do surgery....not


    drug

    Quoted message said:

    companies you loon....plus then there are the hospital
    bills,,,anesthesia...etc...maroon..

    Quoted message said:

    You tell us all why chelation doesn't work again. We all want to have a
    great laugh. We're fun people you know.--rb

    no...you tell US why it does???? got that angiographic proof yet??? NOT

    Me and many other's have already told you! You can't seem to "comprehend"
    what we say.--rb

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    It's not very expensive at all

    oh???? and you know that how???

    Why I read and search the net of course!--rb

    Quoted message said:

    actually EECP is done in 6 week,,three times a week increments...costs


    about

    Quoted message said:

    $1500 per treatment...can you multiply that high??? doubt


    it..."symptomatic

    Quoted message said:

    relief" only ditzball... [6x3x$1500=$27,000.00 for 18--rb]

    A treatment session lasts about one hour, during which you can read,
    listen to music, or relax comfortably. Most patients undergo 35 one-hour
    sessions, once or twice a day, over the course of a few weeks. The cost is
    $250.00 per treatment! 35 x $250.00 = $8,750.00. So where are you getting
    "ripped off" at?--rb

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    compared to cabg's etc. It will be though if
    ever the pro meds get their greedy grubby hands on it.--rb

    OK..multiply the above figures and you get WAY less than a cabg.....and


    the

    Quoted message said:

    EECP's joints I have visited ARE run by pro meds...cardiologists to be
    exact...

    Is that why the costs are so high? That's what i call shameless
    profiteering.
    Do you mean to tell me that a CABG costs less than $27,000.00? That's not
    what i've heard!--rb

    Medicare requires REAL docs be in charge of such treatment...

    EECP is so simple that nurses could almost give it!--rb

    Quoted message said:


    again...rubber balls...YOUR explanation please???

    My explanation of what? Also would you please stop making these sexual
    references to my genitalia please. I'm not trying to turn you on on purpose
    you know.--rb

    Quoted message said:


    maroon.....
    hawki

  7. Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: A vote for Mark
    From: "rb" [email hidden]
    Date: 7/16/2003 7:13 PM Pacific Daylight Time

    Quoted message said:

    Me and many other's have already told you! You can't seem to "comprehend"
    what we say.--rb

    all "you and the others have told me" is that there is NO angiographic evidence

    Quoted message said:

    Why I read and search the net of course!--rb

    funny...not what the CEO of said company says they are collecting...

    Quoted message said:

    Do you mean to tell me that a CABG costs less than $27,000.00? That's not

    Quoted message said:

    what i've heard!--rb

    you doofus...try seeing the CABG statement and what the insurance co
    reimburses...way LESS than that...

    Quoted message said:

    EECP is so simple that nurses could almost give it!--rb


    rubber "brain" if you prefer..yep nurses DO IT...care to meet my good friend
    Katie?? docs are NOT there at all...though it IS EVELLLLL organized meds that
    order it..

    Quoted message said:

    Medicare requires REAL docs be in charge of such treatment...

    try documenting it...."being in charge" and "performing the
    treatment"...yep...you would have NOOOO way of knowing there is a difference...

    maroon

    hawki

  8. rb said:

    "Hawki63" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: A vote for Mark
    From: "rb" [email hidden]
    Date: 7/16/2003 10:24 AM Pacific Daylight Time

    Quoted message said:

    Whats so secret about how much your hubby's heart
    surgery really cost unless the price is so high you're too embarrassed to
    admit just how expensive these conventional treatments really are?--rb

    actually rubber balls...it was truly a bargain at any cost!!!

    Still too high to mention huh.

    Rubber, it is irrelevant to the issues. Her husband had effective
    treatment, and chelation for atherosclerosis is useless. What is so hard
    about that simple concept for you to understand?

    But then again didn't you mention your

    Quoted message said:

    husband was one of these sellers for the drug companies!

    I did not see her write that. Do you often make up things when you
    cannot find something to plagiarize?

    Did he sell so many

    Quoted message said:

    useless and dangerous drugs that they basically gave him a free surgery? No
    wonder you're so coy.--rb

    You really are dumb. Even my friends wife had to pay for her surgery and
    hospitalization, and he is chief of service at the hospital.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    the guy looks and feels oh....maybe 48 and he's pushing 64...you should be

    so

    Quoted message said:

    handsome....

    They've got him now. It's only a matter of time before these anti
    cholesterol drugs he's taking will wreck his liver and kidney's if his
    arteries don't clog up again first in 5 or 6 years time! --rb

    Sure. You do have proof of that? The meds work wonders.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    still waiting for YOUR explanation of EECP,,,which we all know you haven't

    a

    Quoted message said:

    clue about...

    Quoted message said:

    You tell us all why chelation doesn't work again. We all want to have a
    great laugh. We're fun people you know.--rb

    Wrong. YOU explain why the before and after chelation angiography shows
    no change and why you persist in cxlaiming it works.

    snip

  9. Hawki63 said:
    Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: A vote for Mark
    From: Mark Probert

    Quoted message said:

    Rubber, it is irrelevant to the issues. Her husband had effective
    treatment, and chelation for atherosclerosis is useless. What is so hard
    about that simple concept for you to understand?

    I just had a thought...almost a funny....rubber brain suffers severe crushing
    chest pain,,sweating,,arm pain..the whole enchilada...calls 911..paramedics
    take him to the nearest "real" hospital...he is having a heart attack...

    From beneath his oxygen mask he pleads "chelation,,chelation"...as the
    attendings tell him he needs restored blood flow (arteries,,veins..who knows??)
    NOW...not some pipe dream that somewhere in the distant future "they" might
    find that chelation actually works to declog coronary arteries.

    whatyathink RB chooses???

    ding ding ding...

    S/h/it will probably choose the chelation, as it is cheaper, but not
    necessarily cost effective.

  10. stuart said:

    "Hawki63" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: A vote for Mark
    From: Mark Probert

    Quoted message said:

    Rubber, it is irrelevant to the issues. Her husband had effective
    treatment, and chelation for atherosclerosis is useless. What is so hard
    about that simple concept for you to understand?

    I just had a thought...almost a funny....rubber brain suffers severe

    crushing

    Quoted message said:

    chest pain,,sweating,,arm pain..the whole enchilada...calls

    911..paramedics

    Quoted message said:

    take him to the nearest "real" hospital...he is having a heart attack...

    From beneath his oxygen mask he pleads "chelation,,chelation"...as the
    attendings tell him he needs restored blood flow (arteries,,veins..who

    knows??)

    Quoted message said:

    NOW...not some pipe dream that somewhere in the distant future "they"

    might

    Quoted message said:

    find that chelation actually works to declog coronary arteries.

    whatyathink RB chooses???

    ding ding ding...

    hawki
    hawki

    Chelation doesn't do squat for clogged arteries. Nadda thing.

    Correctomundo!

    Except that

    Quoted message said:

    you might have a little less money in your pocket for ice cream desserts
    perhaps.

    That may benefit, since the patient will cut down on the fat laden ice
    cream and lower their cholesterol.

  11. --

    "Mark Probert" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Peter Bowditch said:
    Mark Probert said:

    chutzpah

    Careful, Mark. Words like that might identify you as a "New Yorker".
    (Wink, wink, know what I mean?)

    Sure do. Dontcha just love buzzwords?

    Hey! Using code words that the rest of us don't understand isn't Kosher!

    ;o) Rich

  12. In article <[email hidden]>,

    stuart said:


    "Hawki63" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: A vote for Mark
    From: Mark Probert

    Quoted message said:

    Rubber, it is irrelevant to the issues. Her husband had effective
    treatment, and chelation for atherosclerosis is useless. What is so hard
    about that simple concept for you to understand?

    I just had a thought...almost a funny....rubber brain suffers severe


    crushing

    Quoted message said:

    chest pain,,sweating,,arm pain..the whole enchilada...calls


    911..paramedics

    Quoted message said:

    take him to the nearest "real" hospital...he is having a heart attack...

    From beneath his oxygen mask he pleads "chelation,,chelation"...as the
    attendings tell him he needs restored blood flow (arteries,,veins..who


    knows??)

    Quoted message said:

    NOW...not some pipe dream that somewhere in the distant future "they"


    might

    Quoted message said:

    find that chelation actually works to declog coronary arteries.

    whatyathink RB chooses???

    ding ding ding...

    hawki
    hawki

    Chelation doesn't do squat for clogged arteries. Nadda thing. Except that
    you might have a little less money in your pocket for ice cream desserts
    perhaps.

    Stuart, please stop being reasonable at once. It's too
    disorienting when you do that.

    -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
    These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
    "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
    were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.