I don't know what you mean. You've suggested to me that the Sugiura experiments were never repeated. Then you tell me that you know of two cases where it was, but done improperly. You've not sent me nor posting anything that verifies that. Still, you have acknowledged that Moss lied about his employment and lied about the experiements. Despite this, you think that Dr Barrett is the one being dishonest.
Please tell me what SPECIFICALLY makes you believe that Laetrile is a VALID treatment and that it is being suppressed as part of a conspiracy by oncologists (and perhaps others).
Quoted message said:
Anth
"Ilsa9" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Because it's one sided. Anth
He also puts in a complete bibliography plus links to the "other" side.
That's
Quoted message said:
a pretty admirable practice. Obviously, one may take the view that Dr
Barrett
Quoted message said:
is against alt-med and is therefore unqualified to speak out against them. However, he does supply his reasoning on a case by case basis.
Discounting a while documented paper simply on the basis of the author is
not a
Quoted message said:
good idea. People you or I find odious may well be correct in their
matters of
Quoted message said:
fact. If you disagree with Dr Barrett viz-a-viz Laetrile, what specific citation/quote/statistic do you dispute?
