General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Re: Interesting historical look at homeopathy

Started by Peter Bowditch · · Last activity · 3 posts · 305 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
5 August 2003
Last activity
6 August 2003
Original author
Peter Bowditch
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
305
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. (Jan) said:
    Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: Interesting historical look at homeopathy
    From: Peter Bowditch [email hidden]
    Date: 8/4/2003 8:47 PM Pacific Standard Time
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    (Angela) said:

    There is Nothing on this news group as predictable as the "I and
    some others here are well informed about this 200-year old "system" of
    medicine".

    In 1811, a thing called "Avogadro's Number" was proposed. The
    existence of this number says all that has to be said about
    homeopathy. It cannot work. It never worked. It will never work. It is
    not a "placebo effect". The observed results of homeopathy are what
    is known as "regression to the mean"

    Now for the truth, something foreign to Peter Bowditch.

    <snip loads of stuff we have all heard before>

    Except this bit, of course

    Quoted message said:

    However,
    we found insufficient evidence from these studies that homeopathy is clearly
    efficacious for any single clinical condition.

    --
    Peter Bowditch [email hidden]
    The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
    The Green Light http://www.ratbags.com/greenlight
    I'm a Bright. Are you?

  2. --

    "Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Showing you complete DISHONESTY in picking out ONLY the part that you


    agreed

    Quoted message said:

    with.

    $ KaChing $11

  3. Jan said:

    Showing you complete DISHONESTY in picking out ONLY the part that you agreed
    with.

    Jan, it is the bottom line, the conclusion. It is the only part that
    counts.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.