carabelli said:
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:> >I promise not to throw it back in your face.
>
> Then you asked if I trusted you.
>
> Duh.Well, when your version of logic directly links amalgams to the
CrucifixionQuoted message said:Quoted message said:what do you expect?
carabelli
I expect people to keep their word. You mentioned the 147,000.
When I give my wrod I keep it, you don't, and can't be trusted.
Sad that.
Jan
If I had decided to throw it back in your face, check some of my google
archives................I would have accused you of wandering around the internet in your underwear.
Sad that.
Quoted message said:
Three sandwiches shy of a full picnic basket.
Sad that.
Quoted message said:
Couldn't generate 350 mV if you had to.
Sad that.
Quoted message said:
Unable to discern between a Reader's Digest quality abstract and a published
study in its' entirety.
Sad that.
Quoted message said:
No desire to discern between an abstract and a study if it suits your
purpose.
Sad that.
Quoted message said:
And a shill for charlatans.
Cat in the Hat.
Quoted message said:-----------
*But* I didn't do that this time. You got an easy to catch, soft
underhand toss. It's your problem that you played it like a AA shortstop
and let it dribble between your legs.carabelli
--
Joel M. Eichen, .
Philadelphia PA
STANDARD DISCLAIMER applies:
<You fill it in>