Re: What amazes me.

In article said:

(Jan) said:

And David Wright *thinks* he is almost always correct.

Arrogance.

I wonder how often Jan "thinks" that *she* is correct:-))))

Could it be -- every time?

Quoted message said:

Jan the retired day care worker thinks she knows more than
conventional doctors and dentists. And she complains of others having
an ego problem.

Cue Jan to whine about how she is being attacked.

Lord have mercy.

Quoted message said:

That's why David isn't there. His posts have insults, belittling and
name calling.

Goodness me, the things I miss by having Jan in my killfile. Hey, I
admit I use insults, belittling, and name-calling on occasion. But I
also use facts, and I understand the references I post, claims Jan
cannot truthfully make.

Quoted message said:

Jan says:
Jewboy, pervert, idiot, atheist, Peter Moron, Mark Problem, Steven
BarRAT, wam bat and on and on and on. It is amazing that Jan is
completely blind to how she is guilty of exactly what she obsessively
accuses others of.

Insults, belittling and name calling are Jan Drew's specialty. And the
proof is her OWN words.

Yeah, but she never admits it. When *she* does it, she's on the side
of the angels. She's just "telling the truth," or some other sleazy
dodge.

-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
"If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)

On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 23:16:55 GMT, [email hidden] (David

Wright) said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

That's why David isn't there. His posts have insults, belittling and
name calling.

Goodness me, the things I miss by having Jan in my killfile. Hey, I
admit I use insults, belittling, and name-calling on occasion. But I
also use facts, and I understand the references I post, claims Jan
cannot truthfully make.

And you have the honesty to admit that you use insults, belittling and
name calling. Jan OTOH engages in this behavior repeatedly and instead
of admitting it, she accuses others of doing it. And Jan engages in
this behavior simply if some expresses an opinion that differs from
hers.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Jan says:
Jewboy, pervert, idiot, atheist, Peter Moron, Mark Problem, Steven
BarRAT, wam bat and on and on and on. It is amazing that Jan is
completely blind to how she is guilty of exactly what she obsessively
accuses others of.

Insults, belittling and name calling are Jan Drew's specialty. And the
proof is her OWN words.

Yeah, but she never admits it. When *she* does it, she's on the side
of the angels.

Cue Jan to ask David to cut and paste where she said she was "on the
side of angels" and to call him a liar for failing to do so.

Quoted message said:

She's just "telling the truth," or some other sleazy
dodge.

The truth and Jan Drew is the mother of all oxymorons.

Aloha,

Rich

Quoted message said:

-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
"If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)

------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------

The best defense to logic is ignorance.

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: What amazes me.
From: [email hidden] (David Wright)
Date: 10/30/2003 3:16 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

In article said:

On 30 Oct 2003 20:37:56 GMT, [email hidden] (Jan) wrote:

I see Rich is still stalking. He just can't help himself.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

And David Wright *thinks* he is almost always correct.

Arrogance.

I wonder how often Jan "thinks" that *she* is correct:-))))

Could it be -- every time?

That would be you. Are you encouraging Rich's stalking after asking him to
stop??

Quoted message said:

These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.

Quoted message said:

Jan the retired day care worker

That would be owner/director.

But the stalker likes to belittle.

Quoted message said:

thinks she knows more than

Quoted message said:

conventional doctors and dentists.

That would be a lie. Typical of Rich.

Quoted message said:

And she complains of others having

Quoted message said:

an ego problem.

No complaining, just the truth.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Cue Jan to whine about how she is being attacked.

Wrong again.

Quoted message said:

Lord have mercy.

Quoted message said:

That's why David isn't there. His posts have insults, belittling and

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

name calling.

Goodness me, the things I miss by having Jan in my killfile.

Doubtful, Rich is most likely copying every word.

Quoted message said:

Hey, Iadmit I use insults, belittling, and name-calling on occasion.

On ocassion??

Quoted message said:

But Ialso use facts, and I understand the references I post, claims Jan cannot

truthfully make.

Wrong, that's just a belittling opinion.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Jan says:
Jewboy, pervert, idiot, atheist, Peter Moron, Mark Problem, Steven
BarRAT, wam bat and on and on and on

Rich is obsessed, and I have never posted Peter Moron.

Don't remember using idiot, but might have once, just like the jewboy.

People who lead nudie hikes and watch a couple do what comes naturally is
surely a prevert.

Quoted message said:

It is amazing that Jan is

Quoted message said:

completely blind to how she is guilty of exactly what she obsessively
accuses others of.

Poor, poor Rich, doing exactly that.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Insults, belittling and name calling are Jan Drew's specialty. And the
proof is her OWN words.

Yeah, right. Ever notice Rich doesn't mention Andrew's specialty??

Quoted message said:

Yeah, but she never admits it.

Wrong. You have said this before. How many times do I have to prove you wrong??

From: JDrew63929 ([email hidden])Subject:
Re: Andrew? was Re: Migraines & Magnets Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative
Date: 2000/06/21 .

Yes I admit I am too quick to react. I respect John's for ability to remain a
gentleman and say what needs to be said. This NG has become a trashing contest,
rather than an alternative NG. I hope this will change

Thanks for your sincere reply.Jan

From: Jan ([email hidden])Subject: Re: Re Why are people turning to alt.
medicine? Newsgroups: misc.health.alternativeDate: 2002-03-03 09:20:35 PST

Yes I said that and it was wrong

From: JDrew63929 ([email hidden])

Subject: Re: ? for rich andrews, was: re some religious laws or something
Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative Date: 2001-07-12 19:03:30 PST

I stand corrected. Rich did not ask me to post them.

From: JDrew63929 ([email hidden])

Subject: Re: Is she a doctor? Newsgroups: misc.health.alternativeDate:
1999/06/15
Yes, you are quite correct. I stand corrected. I do believe this is in a
different context than Happy Dog was referring to.

From: JDrew63929 ([email hidden])Subject: Re: Interesting Info from Dr.
Barrett Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative Date: 2001-07-05 00:45:34 PST

I do wish to apologize, I should have stated that it was the first post that I
have read from you. Not your very first post. My mistake. Sorry, I caused you
all that trouble. I suspect you have already figured this out, before you read
this. And I do apologize for saying that. That wasn't fair.

([email hidden])Subject: Re: Take a hike Newsgroups: sci.med.dentistry
Date: 2001-09-14 15:47:45 PST

Yes, you are correct and I apologize for losing my temper.

JDrew63929" <[email hidden]>

From Happy Dog

Jan, please tell us where this quote is from. Revelations? Is it in your
bible? You are supporting it so I assume you're sure that it comes from the
bible. So tell us where. I can't find it. But since you're the devout
Christian, you must be able to. >> >erf

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

First of all I have never said I was a devout Christian.

OK. You aren't a devout Christian. Thanks for clearing that up'
You're welcome, however you snipped, I try, but God ain't done with me yet.

From: JDrew63929 ([email hidden])
Subject: Re: Judging & Jan was:AF/Dr. S./Allergies
Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative
Date: 2000/06/21

In thinking that over, you are *totally* correct. I apologize.

From karuna:

I am sorry for my flippant reply to Rich's post - that was thoughtless.

Quoted message said:

Thank you karuna, aren't we all guilty of that?? YES YES YES.

From: JDrew63929 ([email hidden])
Subject: Re: Fears Raised Over Preservative In Vaccines
Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative
Date: 2001-07-22 12:20:17 PST

I don't know what happend TDN. All I know is that I do indeed know how to do
asearch. I searched for it over and over using every possible word. It simply
was not there. If you didn,'t nuke it then I apologize. I don't usually accuse
people of something until I have checked and doubled checked.

From: JDrew63929 ([email hidden])
Subject: Re: Huggy Bear and [censored] Sapiens Andrew
Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative
Date: 2000/03/18

From Andrew:

Quoted message said:

I owe you an apology. I had asked if you were AF's bubba. I don't remember

whatyou had said, perhaps I read it wrong? At any rate, I apologize for all the
things I said.

From Jan:

Quoted message said:

Well, thank you. And I apologize as well. I guess I get a bit riled. I seem to

be a good punching bag, but then I have been told it is soo much fun to pick on
me. I can't imagine why? Your are welcome. I hardly know what to say. (smile-it
doesn't happen often) Iaccept and appreciate your apology. I also apologize and
ask your forgiveness. This has really hit me hard.

Jan

==

Quoted message said:

When *she* does it, she's on the side
of the angels. She's just "telling the truth," or some other sleazy
dodge.

See above, you are being absurd.

Jan

"Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

That would be a lie. Typical of Rich.

Jan

$ KaChing $31

(Jan) said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: What amazes me.
From: [email hidden] (David Wright)
Date: 10/30/2003 3:16 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

In article said:

On 30 Oct 2003 20:37:56 GMT, [email hidden] (Jan) wrote:

I see Rich is still stalking. He just can't help himself.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

>And David Wright *thinks* he is almost always correct.
>
>Arrogance.

I wonder how often Jan "thinks" that *she* is correct:-))))

Could it be -- every time?

That would be you. Are you encouraging Rich's stalking after asking him to
stop??

Quoted message said:

These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.

Quoted message said:

Jan the retired day care worker

That would be owner/director.

But the stalker likes to belittle.

Quoted message said:

thinks she knows more than

Quoted message said:

conventional doctors and dentists.

That would be a lie. Typical of Rich.

Quoted message said:

And she complains of others having

Quoted message said:

an ego problem.

No complaining, just the truth.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Cue Jan to whine about how she is being attacked.

Wrong again.

Oh really. Look above. You accuse me of stalking and belittling you.
Oh, I am sorry, you never used the exact work "attacked". My bad:-)))

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Jan says:
Jewboy, pervert, idiot, atheist, Peter Moron, Mark Problem, Steven
BarRAT, wam bat and on and on and on

Rich is obsessed, and I have never posted Peter Moron.

Hahahahahhahahaahah. Notice that she does not deny any of the other
names. If Jan never called Peter Moran, moron then I apologize. See,
it is easy for debunkers to apologize when they make mistakes.

Quoted message said:

Don't remember using idiot, but might have once, just like the jewboy.

People who lead nudie hikes and watch a couple do what comes naturally is
surely a prevert.

Poor Jan. Still fantacizing about nude hiking. What would James think.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Insults, belittling and name calling are Jan Drew's specialty. And the
proof is her OWN words.

Yeah, right. Ever notice Rich doesn't mention Andrew's specialty??

How did Andrew get into this discussion?? Once again Jan tries to
divert attention away from her own abusive behavior. The point is that
jan accuses others of insults, belittling and name calling while she
does same. I don't recall Andrew complaining about other calling names
or belittling. There are a lot of people in this newsgroup who
belittle, insult and call people names. There is only ONE who
regularly accuses people of this behavior while completely denying
that she does it. Jan the hypocrite Drew is her name.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Yeah, but she never admits it.

Wrong. You have said this before. How many times do I have to prove you wrong??

I apologize. I should have said that she rarely admits it. See. Once
again it is easy to apologize when you see you are wrong.

Aloha,

Rich

------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------

The best defense to logic is ignorance.

In article said:

On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 23:16:55 GMT, [email hidden] (David

Wright) said:

Quoted message said:

>That's why David isn't there. His posts have insults, belittling and
>name calling.

Goodness me, the things I miss by having Jan in my killfile. Hey, I
admit I use insults, belittling, and name-calling on occasion. But I
also use facts, and I understand the references I post, claims Jan
cannot truthfully make.

And you have the honesty to admit that you use insults, belittling and
name calling. Jan OTOH engages in this behavior repeatedly and instead
of admitting it, she accuses others of doing it. And Jan engages in
this behavior simply if some expresses an opinion that differs from
hers.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Jan says:
Jewboy, pervert, idiot, atheist, Peter Moron, Mark Problem, Steven
BarRAT, wam bat and on and on and on. It is amazing that Jan is
completely blind to how she is guilty of exactly what she obsessively
accuses others of.

Insults, belittling and name calling are Jan Drew's specialty. And the
proof is her OWN words.

Yeah, but she never admits it. When *she* does it, she's on the side
of the angels.

In the interests of accuracy, let me rephrase the foregoing to "Yeah,
but she rarely admits it." The second sentence remains as-is.

-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
"If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)

In said:

I see Rich is still stalking. He just can't help himself.

Replying to a post by you is "stalking?"
I'm curious: what is this:

In <[email hidden]>, Jan wrote:

# Cue for LIAR Richard H. Jacobson to come a long with his LIES

--
| "Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a |
| completely unintentional side effect. " -- Linus Torvalds |
+--------------- D. C. Sessions <[email hidden]> ----------+

D. C. Sessions said:

In said:

I see Rich is still stalking. He just can't help himself.

Replying to a post by you is "stalking?"
I'm curious: what is this:

In <[email hidden]>, Jan wrote:

# Cue for LIAR Richard H. Jacobson to come a long with his LIES

Cue for Jan Drew to say "It is the truth". Sadly Jan has yet to post a
single lie that I told wrt her amalgam history unless you consider my
saying that she felt better than she had in "years" instead of "two
years" as a lie. Or maybe my typo of posting January instead of June
is a "lie".

Sadly Jan accuses people of lying simply because she does not like
them. Jan accuses people of lying simply because they expose her own
lies. Jan needs to discredit those who disagree with her POV. Jan does
not care if she lies and bears false witness against those with whom
she disagrees. Jan spits on the Ten Commandments and then calls
someone a "Jewboy" for her perception that he blasphemed the Ten
Commandments. Sad that.

Aloha,

Rich

------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------

The best defense to logic is ignorance.