Road Cycling · Public discussion

tdf race tactics for Lotto and QuickStep

Started by tourdelivermore · · Last activity · 3 posts · 1,562 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
8 July 2005
Last activity
13 July 2005
Original author
tourdelivermore
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,562
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. As reported today in cyclingnews.com:

    Sergeant tired of it
    Davitamon-Lotto directeur sportif Marc Sergeant is getting tired of the other teams' tactics in the first week, which put all the pressure on his team and Quick.Step to chase the breaks. He also commented on the dangerous finale of yesterday's stage, which caused a mass pileup in the peloton. "I had scouted the last kilometres in details.I knew this was something that could happen: pedestrian crossing, bends and rain. It was a deadly mix. Unfortunately, they went down.

    "Robbie was where he had to be but it led to nothing. I think the boys did a lot of effort getting that break back from eight minutes, but it will be the last time we did this. I'm really tired of it. Those teams are always sending men ahead. They have a sprinter there but they never get to the sprint. I mean if you bring a sprinter to the tour you have to ride for him too. We have a good understanding with QuickStep, but I point at Hushovd and Crédit Agricole. They're always quick to jump with things and then in the end they draw the card Hushovd. Without the rain and the crash it would have been a sprint between Robbie, Boonen, and Hushovd."

    As a suggestion to get the other teams do do some work, why don't Lotto and QuickStep each send someone in off the front? If the other teams didn't pull back the break away, they would take the stage...if they did, Lotto and QuickStep would still have the sprint.

    Any experienced race tactitions have a comment?

  2. Not a bad tactic but who would you send out.

    tourdelivermore said:

    As reported today in cyclingnews.com:

    Sergeant tired of it
    Davitamon-Lotto directeur sportif Marc Sergeant is getting tired of the other teams' tactics in the first week, which put all the pressure on his team and Quick.Step to chase the breaks. He also commented on the dangerous finale of yesterday's stage, which caused a mass pileup in the peloton. "I had scouted the last kilometres in details.I knew this was something that could happen: pedestrian crossing, bends and rain. It was a deadly mix. Unfortunately, they went down.

    "Robbie was where he had to be but it led to nothing. I think the boys did a lot of effort getting that break back from eight minutes, but it will be the last time we did this. I'm really tired of it. Those teams are always sending men ahead. They have a sprinter there but they never get to the sprint. I mean if you bring a sprinter to the tour you have to ride for him too. We have a good understanding with QuickStep, but I point at Hushovd and Crédit Agricole. They're always quick to jump with things and then in the end they draw the card Hushovd. Without the rain and the crash it would have been a sprint between Robbie, Boonen, and Hushovd."

    As a suggestion to get the other teams do do some work, why don't Lotto and QuickStep each send someone in off the front? If the other teams didn't pull back the break away, they would take the stage...if they did, Lotto and QuickStep would still have the sprint.

    Any experienced race tactitions have a comment?

  3. tourdelivermore said:

    As reported today in cyclingnews.com:

    Sergeant tired of it
    Davitamon-Lotto directeur sportif Marc Sergeant is getting tired of the other teams' tactics in the first week, which put all the pressure on his team and Quick.Step to chase the breaks. He also commented on the dangerous finale of yesterday's stage, which caused a mass pileup in the peloton. "I had scouted the last kilometres in details.I knew this was something that could happen: pedestrian crossing, bends and rain. It was a deadly mix. Unfortunately, they went down.

    "Robbie was where he had to be but it led to nothing. I think the boys did a lot of effort getting that break back from eight minutes, but it will be the last time we did this. I'm really tired of it. Those teams are always sending men ahead. They have a sprinter there but they never get to the sprint. I mean if you bring a sprinter to the tour you have to ride for him too. We have a good understanding with QuickStep, but I point at Hushovd and Crédit Agricole. They're always quick to jump with things and then in the end they draw the card Hushovd. Without the rain and the crash it would have been a sprint between Robbie, Boonen, and Hushovd."

    As a suggestion to get the other teams do do some work, why don't Lotto and QuickStep each send someone in off the front? If the other teams didn't pull back the break away, they would take the stage...if they did, Lotto and QuickStep would still have the sprint.

    Any experienced race tactitions have a comment?

    Sergeant has a short memory. Robbie is the absolute master of taking advantage of the hard work of other teams and then popping up for the win.

    Now they have brought a whole team based around him, they're crying foul!!

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.