Disagree.
The Pharmaceutical Industry does not dictate TDF business policy--nor do they advertise much--if at all in cycling.
Did you know Amgen has a California squad, ironically? Those are fun rides.
Drug firms are interested in cycist as Guinae Pigs, not salesmen. The trauma and anemia research is tremendous. The very best.
The sposnors who sign contracts with TDF organizers do have a say re: policy as they are writing the checks (underwriting the affair)
And they do NOT want a leader diqualified under any circumstances. (1978 was the last time)
Not even the 1998 Festina & TVM doping discoveries derailed the Tour--despite 40% abandoning the race.
1998 proved who is in charge---advertisers are!
btw: when a rider is caught by housekeeping or customs---they are exposed and discredited--while the other cheaters are protected. that must change.
100% DQ if anyone is caught. That's fair.
Lifetime bans---for entire teams and riders.
Peace.
wolfix said:I love the sport of cycling. But I fully understand at times as to why potential sponsors shy away. I am not naive about doping in the TDF and cycling in general. { And please Flyer, when you respond to this, please keep the post relevent to just the effects doping has on sponsorship }.........
I personally had to generate sponsorship for our team and our local crit years ago. Certain riders on our team made it extremly difficult with their extreme views toward certain sponsors. The corporate sponsors make the TDF happen. { Ok , Flyer, this is your opening to let us know how the corporate drug companies dictate policy at the TDF. }
Doping has been a part of the TDF for many years. It is not going away. but when a rider gets caught, punishment must be swift and strong. When a rider tests dirty, the dirty rider has stolen from his fans. He has stolen from his peers.