CyclingForums
A community for cyclists, gear, training and racing.
Road Cycling · Public discussion
This thread is locked and is currently read-only.
Thread details
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
Hey guys.
I was just wondering, which of the two above bikes would you favour? I have had a write on the Dawes Giro 200, and havn't ever seen the San Remo in real life. They are of similar prices, and I would like your opinion of the better of the two. I like the low riding position on the Giro, but I guess this could be achieved by flipping the stem on the San Remo, if it's not allready low enough. What other differences are there between the two models?
Any replies are apreciated, cheers, Mat
I too have been looking at these two bikes and also the Barrcuda Azzuri, and as a newbie would also be interested in any feedback from other users. Cheers
I ended up getting the Giro 300, found it cheep on mail order for the same price i was going to pay for the 200 (£300). It's great. Get the best you can afford, it will be worth it.
Mat
Active in the last 60 minutes
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.