General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Trolls and arguments

Started by Bew · · Last activity · 48 posts · 1,290 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
3 March 2004
Last activity
5 March 2004
Original author
Bew
Posts
48
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,290
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 41–48 of 48
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] (DRCEEPHD) wrote:

    [Snip]

    Quoted message said:

    I am a scientist.

    ROTFLMAO!!!!!

    Sorry, but that was so funny that I couldn't take any of the rest of
    what you said in the least bit seriously.

    [Snip]

    --
    Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
    |
    |"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you
    | inconvenience me with questions?"

  2. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Gymmy Bob said:

    Nicely Said Bew!

    Notice the pattern of one of the chief trolls here? Question each and every
    statement no matter how many times it has been proven

    Of course, "Gymmy Bob's" definition of it's having "been proven" means
    that some altie website claimed it was so, which to him means it must
    actually be so.

    Quoted message said:

    or how much common
    sense their is to it.

    "Common sense" meaning that it makes sense to alties. Whether it makes
    sense when weighted against what is presently known scientifically,
    Gymmy cares not one whit about.

    Quoted message said:

    These people thrive on just questioning physics and
    sooner or later somebody cannot prove the laws of nature.

    Some alties thrive on ignoring the laws of nature and physics if it
    helps them come up with an explanation that "makes sense" (to them only,
    of course) for their favorite "cure."

    Quoted message said:

    Prove 2 + 2 = 4

    Nobody can. It is based on our set out mathematical laws and other than that
    has no meaning.

    Funny, but mathematicians would beg to differ with you on this one.

    --
    Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
    |
    |"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you
    | inconvenience me with questions?"

  3. In article <[email hidden]>,

    DRCEEPHD said:
    Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: Trolls and arguments
    From: Orac [email hidden]
    Date: 3/3/04 8:24 PM Eastern Standard Time
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>, "Bew" <qw@nonamewhatsover>

    Quoted message said:

    If you are new to this ng (like me) you will very quickly notice that there
    is a very concentrated attempt to discredit any claims made about the
    effectiveness of alternative cures or approaches to medical problems.

    TRANSLATION: This is not the warm, fuzzy, environment that I

    Quoted message said:

    TRANSLATION: This is not the warm, fuzzy, environment that I was
    expecting when I discovered this newsgroup. I had expected an
    environment where everyone reinforces my altie beliefs, without any
    scientists or skeptics around to question them.


    Explanation: The so called scientists or skeptics that abound here do not
    question in fairness. Their goal is to insult, demean, degrade, and otherwise
    cause mayhem such that the medical monopoly continues unabated with its goals
    of extracting as much money and power as it can from the supplicants called
    patients.

    Actual explanation: Chuck is some chalupa-snorting bookstore employee
    who tries to convince us he's something more.

    Quoted message said:

    I am a scientist.

    Ho ho ho.

    Quoted message said:

    I am not a member of the church of modern medicine.

    I will not encourage you to try and cut-burn-poison yourself into health.

    Those that encourage you to do so by discouraging any rational discussion of
    alternative procedures need to be scourged and crucified as in the Passion.

    That's what I like about Chuck -- his forgiving, Christian nature.

    -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
    These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
    "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
    were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)

  4. "Coleah" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:72l1c.467677$na.1110714@attbi_s04...

    Quoted message said:


    "HCN" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:G9e1c.167318$jk2.615693@attbi_s53...

    Quoted message said:

    By the way on a related note, I have learned a new word this week:
    cyperchondria . On www.google.com it brought up 5990 hits.


    ===============
    (Opps....typo) Cyberchondria
    http://www.imakenews.com/health-itworld/e_article000152340.cfm
    Interesting article.


    ....

    It does look interesting. Though in my experience, my relative always
    seemed to be suffering from a different ailment at each holiday gathering.
    It was always something she read about on the internet.

    Oh, sorry about the typo... perhaps I am coming down with some keyboard
    dis-association ailment.

  5. "Coleah" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:72l1c.467677$na.1110714@attbi_s04...

    Quoted message said:


    "HCN" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:G9e1c.167318$jk2.615693@attbi_s53...

    Quoted message said:

    By the way on a related note, I have learned a new word this week:
    cyperchondria . On www.google.com it brought up 5990 hits.


    ===============
    (Opps....typo) Cyberchondria


    ....

    forgot to say: I am very glad that www.google.com has a spell checker!

  6. [email hidden] (DRCEEPHD) wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: Trolls and arguments
    From: Orac [email hidden]
    Date: 3/3/04 8:24 PM Eastern Standard Time
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>, "Bew" <qw@nonamewhatsover>

    Quoted message said:

    If you are new to this ng (like me) you will very quickly notice that there
    is a very concentrated attempt to discredit any claims made about the
    effectiveness of alternative cures or approaches to medical problems.

    TRANSLATION: This is not the warm, fuzzy, environment that I

    Quoted message said:

    TRANSLATION: This is not the warm, fuzzy, environment that I was
    expecting when I discovered this newsgroup. I had expected an
    environment where everyone reinforces my altie beliefs, without any
    scientists or skeptics around to question them.


    Explanation: The so called scientists or skeptics that abound here do not
    question in fairness. Their goal is to insult, demean, degrade, and otherwise
    cause mayhem such that the medical monopoly continues unabated with its goals
    of extracting as much money and power as it can from the supplicants called
    patients.

    So questions that show you to be clueless about medicine (or basic
    biology & A&P) upset you? That's a durn shame......

    Quoted message said:

    I am a scientist.

    LOLOLOLOL -- good one! The scientific expertise you've demonstrated
    in this NG could be summed up in one word -- none.

    Quoted message said:

    I am not a member of the church of modern medicine.

    As if such a thing existed....

    Quoted message said:

    I will not encourage you to try and cut-burn-poison yourself into health.

    Your expertise only qualifies you to encourage others to consult
    people who actually know what they're talking about.

    Quoted message said:

    Those that encourage you to do so by discouraging any rational discussion of
    alternative procedures need to be scourged and crucified as in the Passion.

    Rational discussion isn't mindless head nodding in agreement with
    anything labeled "alternative". And your hyperbole WRT the idea of
    crucifixion for those who don't blindly embrace every physiologically
    improbable theory that floats around MHA makes your statements that
    you are a scientist even more obviously untrue.

  7. Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    Gymmy Bob said:

    Nicely Said Bew!

    Notice the pattern of one of the chief trolls here? Question each and every
    statement no matter how many times it has been proven

    Of course, "Gymmy Bob's" definition of it's having "been proven" means
    that some altie website claimed it was so, which to him means it must
    actually be so.

    Quoted message said:

    or how much common
    sense their is to it.

    "Common sense" meaning that it makes sense to alties. Whether it makes
    sense when weighted against what is presently known scientifically,
    Gymmy cares not one whit about.

    Quoted message said:

    These people thrive on just questioning physics and
    sooner or later somebody cannot prove the laws of nature.

    Some alties thrive on ignoring the laws of nature and physics if it
    helps them come up with an explanation that "makes sense" (to them only,
    of course) for their favorite "cure."

    Quoted message said:

    Prove 2 + 2 = 4

    Nobody can. It is based on our set out mathematical laws and other than


    that

    Quoted message said:

    has no meaning.

    Funny, but mathematicians would beg to differ with you on this one.

    --
    Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
    |

    Given the virtually unlimited number of unprovable, plausible examples, it
    would take a total dumb-ass to choose one of the few examples of something that
    can be PROVED.


  8. Quoted message said:

    From: [email hidden] (DRCEEPHD)

    Quoted message said:

    I am a scientist.

    Sure, and Rosenau is a Nobel Laureate, H*lda has the Cure for All Diseases, &
    Jan Drew is an Astronaut.

    With all due sincerity, Charles, you MUST learn to think outside the Chalupa.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.