General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Stalled on low-carb bars

Started by Pete · · Last activity · 38 posts · 1,626 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
28 July 2005
Last activity
3 August 2005
Original author
Pete
Posts
38
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,626
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–38 of 38
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Bev-Ann said:

    I haven't tried a lot of their products but the peach iced tea is very good
    and I like their chocolate peanut butter bars.
    OTOH, their pastas are more than vile, they're inedible. I made the
    mistake of buying 10 boxes online before trying them (they weren't
    available in my local stores at that time). That was at the beginning of
    my LC life a year and a half ago. I still have 9 boxes gathering dust in
    my basement. I keep thinking I should try to sell them to some company
    that makes bungie cords. :-)

    Bev

    I'll buy a couple of boxes to try them?
    If I like it, I'll buy the rest from you?

    Whatcha want for them?
    --
    Om.

    "My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-[censored]." -Jack Nicholson

  2. Max Hollywood Harris said:


    I haven't actually read a story, but if it is as you describe, then
    they are in for long range trouble. If you don't need the company (or
    more specifically, to pay the company) to lose the weight, then I don't
    see where the revenue is going to come from. Especially, if as many
    here believe, using the products of the company are counter productive.

    To do Atkins correctly you need a copy of the book, and
    realistically you need that copy longer than the library
    will loan it for. So there's six bucks spent on Atkins
    products. Beyond that every penny spent on their products
    is optional fluff. Core low carb food is veggies, meat,
    dairy, eggs and such, none of which are Atkins prodcts.
    All of their products are either completely optional like
    their snacks or they have plenty of competitors like their
    supplements.

    Quoted message said:

    Personally, I think Dr. Atkins, warts and all, was a very good person
    who wanted to help people. I think Atkins Nutritionals was probably set
    up to help people do the program, lose the weight, and feel better, in
    a time when there were few others trying to do that.

    At one point almost no one was funding low carb studies.
    Dr A founded the company so its profits would go into a
    foundation that would fund low carb studies. I don't
    know what happened to that original intent but somewhere
    along the way they went public and got marketed more and
    more. I have no idea what portion of the profits go to
    that foundation.

    Quoted message said:

    The subsequent
    explosion of products and licensing that seemed immediately to follow
    his death is, imho, what got the company in trouble, and what has led
    to the general ill will towards AN that I note in the group (ie "money
    grubbing, profit mongers with no regard for people"😉.

    Not just money grubbing, but they depict the products as
    low carb food somehow implying that they are good or important
    or whatever not strictly optional yet convenient. There
    are also debates over truth in carb counts on the labels,
    listing products in the plan at a time when they carb ladder
    says certain ingredients shouldn't be tried yet and numerous
    other breaches of the basic principles that should make the
    ANA a simple process.

  3. Doug Freyburger said:

    To do Atkins correctly you need a copy of the book, and
    realistically you need that copy longer than the library
    will loan it for. So there's six bucks spent on Atkins
    products. Beyond that every penny spent on their products
    is optional fluff. Core low carb food is veggies, meat,
    dairy, eggs and such, none of which are Atkins prodcts.
    All of their products are either completely optional like
    their snacks or they have plenty of competitors like their
    supplements.

    I can buy a copy of DANDR for $.75 + 2.79 for shipping on half.com.
    There were several copies available. Same for Atkins 4 Life. Of which,
    the company gets nothing. Additionally, the books are published by Avon
    Books, so likely, a royalty payment goes to Dr. Atkins estate, which
    may include the foundation. I suspect that AN gets nothing from the
    pre-death books, only getting money from the new stuff that no one
    seems to like. If this were my business model, I think I would rethink
    it a little and try to figure where the profit zone is in LC living.

    Quoted message said:

    At one point almost no one was funding low carb studies.
    Dr A founded the company so its profits would go into a
    foundation that would fund low carb studies. I don't
    know what happened to that original intent but somewhere
    along the way they went public and got marketed more and
    more. I have no idea what portion of the profits go to
    that foundation.

    Once you get investors, you get some problems, like demands for growth,
    in a quarterly fashion. In the long term, if LC is actually better for
    you than anything else, the studies to prove it make the case. Of
    course, by that time, the profit zone moves because you have other LC
    plans come out (qv sommersizing, south beach, et al). And you have to
    move to something else as a business (Dr. Atkins probably made plenty
    of money from his practice and the books, but the business, with
    investors, necessarily becomes bigger than Dr. Atkins private wealth).

    Quoted message said:

    Not just money grubbing, but they depict the products as
    low carb food somehow implying that they are good or important
    or whatever not strictly optional yet convenient. There
    are also debates over truth in carb counts on the labels,
    listing products in the plan at a time when they carb ladder
    says certain ingredients shouldn't be tried yet and numerous
    other breaches of the basic principles that should make the
    ANA a simple process.

    Yeah. I recall when I first LC'd back in 2002, each Atkins product
    listed what phases of the diet it would be appropriate for. Very few
    were induction friendly, as I recall, with most of the breads and such
    being for pre-maintenance and maintenance. I think Atkins' death
    certainly hurt the business and possibly the diet phase of the WOL, in
    much the same way that Walt Disney's death hurt his company until the
    advent of Michael Eisner (if you have a good memory and followed
    business, you might recall that Saul Steinberg was going to turn
    Disneyland into a graveyard, because it would offer better returns).

    One last thing, you can get 90% of the information in the book for free
    from the Atkins website and filling in with google. This is not a
    business model I would want to stake my retirement on.

    Hollywood, the resident LC MBA
    264/257/218

  4. "Bev-Ann" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I like their chocolate peanut butter bars. They're the only ones I can eat
    that don't give me terrible gas (no SA's). I haven't tried the S'Mores

    Depends on how you define SA's. their bars (Atkins)are made of polyD and
    glycerine. Not the same as others who mainly use maltitol.

  5. "😉.

    Quoted message said:


    Not just money grubbing, but they depict the products as
    low carb food somehow implying that they are good or important
    or whatever not strictly optional yet convenient. There
    are also debates over truth in carb counts on the labels,
    listing products in the plan at a time when they carb ladder
    says certain ingredients shouldn't be tried yet and numerous
    other breaches of the basic principles that should make the
    ANA a simple process.

    Most of this is bias/opinion. Dateline had some of their products tested
    and found that they were accurate. Ohio State study said the bars had
    minimal impact on blood sugar. It is easier to update the site rather than
    books that are already published and sold. You can read transcripts of
    Atkins interviews to see if he felt that some of these products could be
    part of the program. Google Larry King interview etc.

    http://atkins.com/Archive/2004/7/16-927112.html

    excerpt from site.
    "So remember, these tasty sweets made with sugar alcohols should be eaten
    sparingly and enjoyed as they were designed to be: as occasional treats. The
    majority of your daily meals should consist of nutrient-dense, whole
    foods-the same advice you've been hearing from Atkins for more than three
    decades."

    I have often received similar statements from AN emails.

    Sid...

    Quoted message said:
  6. tominbkk said:

    Well, I guess there wasn't enough money in telling people to eat
    natural, whole foods, and avoid white starches...thus their
    proliferation of frankenfood bullcrap.......

    Frankenfood, traditionally, is about stuff like Monsanto makes,
    Genetically Modified. A LC frankenfood would be something like Corn on
    the Cob that is genetically engineered to have 10% of the impact carbs,
    and the rest in fiber.

    We need a new term for the products sold as LC substitutes. I think
    they like engineered nutrition, which I don't have a problem with, but
    if you want to frame it negatively, I'm sure you can do better than
    grabbing the rhetoric of the "Concerned about GM Foods" group.

    On the other hand, you hit it pretty good here. There's not a lot of
    money to be made in telling people to shop the butcher counter, the
    butter and egg cooler and the veggie aisles, unless you own a lot of
    farms, cows, chickens or other meat sources. Maybe that's the flaw in
    the Atkins Nutritional Inc plan ;-)

    -Hollywood

  7. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Max Hollywood Harris said:
    tominbkk said:

    Well, I guess there wasn't enough money in telling people to eat
    natural, whole foods, and avoid white starches...thus their
    proliferation of frankenfood bullcrap.......

    Frankenfood, traditionally, is about stuff like Monsanto makes,
    Genetically Modified. A LC frankenfood would be something like Corn on
    the Cob that is genetically engineered to have 10% of the impact carbs,
    and the rest in fiber.

    We need a new term for the products sold as LC substitutes. I think
    they like engineered nutrition, which I don't have a problem with, but
    if you want to frame it negatively, I'm sure you can do better than
    grabbing the rhetoric of the "Concerned about GM Foods" group.

    On the other hand, you hit it pretty good here. There's not a lot of
    money to be made in telling people to shop the butcher counter, the
    butter and egg cooler and the veggie aisles, unless you own a lot of
    farms, cows, chickens or other meat sources. Maybe that's the flaw in
    the Atkins Nutritional Inc plan ;-)

    -Hollywood

    What we really need is an idea that Pierce Anthony came up with in one
    of his "Incarnations of Immortality" books. The one featuring "Famine".

    A food manufacturer came out with a food line that had no calories or
    nutrition but was filling and had good flavor...

    Other than zero calorie soft drinks or water, I don't think there are
    any foods like that around? :-)

    Would be nice........
    --
    Om.

    "My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-[censored]." -Jack Nicholson

  8. Honestly if you want them, you can have them all for the price of shipping
    at this point. I also have other brands of LC pasta too.

    OmManiPadmeOmelet said:

    I'll buy a couple of boxes to try them?
    If I like it, I'll buy the rest from you?

    Whatcha want for them?

    -----
    Bev

  9. PolyD and glycerine are not SA's. They also don't have the digestive side
    effects.

    sprudil said:

    Depends on how you define SA's. their bars (Atkins)are made of polyD and
    glycerine. Not the same as others who mainly use maltitol.

    -----
    Bev

  10. Can you post a munged e-mail address and I'll post you
    with mine?

    I can do paypal plus the paypal fee, or send you an MO. :-)

    Om.

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    Bev-Ann said:

    Honestly if you want them, you can have them all for the price of shipping
    at this point. I also have other brands of LC pasta too.

    OmManiPadmeOmelet said:

    I'll buy a couple of boxes to try them?
    If I like it, I'll buy the rest from you?

    Whatcha want for them?

    -----
    Bev


    --
    Om.

    "My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-[censored]." -Jack Nicholson

  11. bev-ann"at"shaw"dot"com

    OmManiPadmeOmelet said:

    Can you post a munged e-mail address and I'll post you
    with mine?

    I can do paypal plus the paypal fee, or send you an MO. :-)

    -----
    Bev

  12. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Bev-Ann said:

    bev-ann"at"shaw"dot"com

    OmManiPadmeOmelet said:

    Can you post a munged e-mail address and I'll post you
    with mine?

    I can do paypal plus the paypal fee, or send you an MO. :-)

    -----
    Bev

    Thank you! :-)
    --
    Om.

    "My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-[censored]." -Jack Nicholson

  13. In article <[email hidden]>,

    OmManiPadmeOmelet said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    Bev-Ann said:

    bev-ann"at"shaw"dot"com

    It's bouncing with fatal errors. :-(

    Do me a favor, e-mail SOS at grandecom dot net and have him forward me a
    message?

    Cheers!
    --
    Om.

    "My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-[censored]." -Jack Nicholson

  14. In article <[email hidden]>,

    OmManiPadmeOmelet said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    Bev-Ann said:

    bev-ann"at"shaw"dot"com

    It's bouncing with fatal errors. :-(

    Do me a favor, e-mail SOS at grandecom dot net and have him forward me a
    message?

    Cheers!
    --
    Om.

    "My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-[censored]." -Jack Nicholson

  15. Done. :-)

    OmManiPadmeOmelet said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    OmManiPadmeOmelet said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    Bev-Ann said:

    bev-ann"at"shaw"dot"com

    It's bouncing with fatal errors. :-(

    Do me a favor, e-mail SOS at grandecom dot net and have him forward me a
    message?

    Cheers!

    -----
    Bev

  16. Still did not work!
    The return mail for that one was noone at nowhere dot com dot (rest of
    address). Thrifty dot net?

    What gives? :-(

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    Bev-Ann said:

    Done. :-)

    OmManiPadmeOmelet said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    OmManiPadmeOmelet said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,
    Bev-Ann <[email hidden]> wrote:

    > bev-ann"at"shaw"dot"com
    >

    It's bouncing with fatal errors. :-(

    Do me a favor, e-mail SOS at grandecom dot net and have him forward me a
    message?

    Cheers!

    -----
    Bev


    --
    Om.

    "My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-[censored]." -Jack Nicholson

  17. Oops! I forgot that when I forward something from newsgroups, it uses my
    no-spam address. I'll send it again from the email section of my program.

    OmManiPadmeOmelet said:

    Still did not work!
    The return mail for that one was noone at nowhere dot com dot (rest of
    address). Thrifty dot net?

    What gives? :-(

    -----
    Bev

  18. Ok, thanks! :-)

    I'll let him know.
    I was asleep when the last one came thru so I found it in his spam
    folder!

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    Bev-Ann said:

    Oops! I forgot that when I forward something from newsgroups, it uses my
    no-spam address. I'll send it again from the email section of my program.

    OmManiPadmeOmelet said:

    Still did not work!
    The return mail for that one was noone at nowhere dot com dot (rest of
    address). Thrifty dot net?

    What gives? :-(

    -----
    Bev


    --
    Om.

    "My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-[censored]." -Jack Nicholson

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.