Charles <[email hidden]> wrote: :> On Sun, 07 Aug 2005 17:22:46 -0400, Dally <[email hidden]> wrote: :> :> >Charles wrote: :> > :> >> On Sun, 07 Aug 2005 16:54:15 -0400, Dally <[email hidden]> :> >> wrote: :> >> :> >> :> >>>Charles wrote: :> >>> :> >>> :> >>>>So Dally and Lance Armstrong are fellow triathletes. Does your :> >>>>vanity know no bounds woman? :> >>> :> >>>I wore a yellow shirt today. :> >> :> >> :> >> I'll bet it was several sizes larger than Lance wears, and I :> >> suspect his entire family could wear your pants at the same :> >> time!! ;o) :> > :> >His entire family are preschoolers. :> :> His wife too? :> :> With Lance the Mrs and the pre-schoolers, that would make quite a :> knickerful and room for the family dog still!! ;o)
So you didn't see any of the tour and the associated shows, huh?
On Sun, 07 Aug 2005 19:57:53 GMT, T <[email hidden]> wrote in misc.fitness.weights:
Quoted message said:
John Hanson said:
On Sat, 06 Aug 2005 20:25:21 GMT, T <[email hidden]> wrote in misc.fitness.weights:
Quoted message said:
>>My point of view in this thread (since you're not bothering to read it) >>is that the sport has to be physically demanding, and you have to train >>for it. Most human beings do not train for physically demanding sports. > >That is an interesting comment. A marathon is a very physically >demanding sport but anyone can train for and compete in it.
Here being able to distinguish 'can train for it' and 'do train for it' would save tons of acrimony.
>many people do who are very inadequate even compared to the general >population. You can't make this argument without also assigning some >level of excellence in that physically demanding sport.
Okay.
>Dally has already done this and made it clear she thinks she makes the >cutoff.
I agree with Dally; she finished in the top half overall, top quarter in the bike.
On Sun, 07 Aug 2005 19:57:53 GMT, T <[email hidden]> wrote in misc.fitness.weights:
Quoted message said:
John Hanson said:
On Sat, 06 Aug 2005 20:25:21 GMT, T <[email hidden]> wrote in misc.fitness.weights:
Quoted message said:
>>My point of view in this thread (since you're not bothering to read it) >>is that the sport has to be physically demanding, and you have to train >>for it. Most human beings do not train for physically demanding sports. > >That is an interesting comment. A marathon is a very physically >demanding sport but anyone can train for and compete in it.
Here being able to distinguish 'can train for it' and 'do train for it' would save tons of acrimony.
>many people do who are very inadequate even compared to the general >population. You can't make this argument without also assigning some >level of excellence in that physically demanding sport.
Okay.
>Dally has already done this and made it clear she thinks she makes the >cutoff.
I agree with Dally; she finished in the top half overall, top quarter in the bike.
Charles <[email hidden]> wrote: :> On Sun, 07 Aug 2005 17:22:46 -0400, Dally <[email hidden]> wrote: :> :> >Charles wrote: :> > :> >> On Sun, 07 Aug 2005 16:54:15 -0400, Dally <[email hidden]> :> >> wrote: :> >> :> >> :> >>>Charles wrote: :> >>> :> >>> :> >>>>So Dally and Lance Armstrong are fellow triathletes. Does your :> >>>>vanity know no bounds woman? :> >>> :> >>>I wore a yellow shirt today. :> >> :> >> :> >> I'll bet it was several sizes larger than Lance wears, and I :> >> suspect his entire family could wear your pants at the same :> >> time!! ;o) :> > :> >His entire family are preschoolers. :> :> His wife too? :> :> With Lance the Mrs and the pre-schoolers, that would make quite a :> knickerful and room for the family dog still!! ;o)
So you didn't see any of the tour and the associated shows, huh?
