General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

NIH finds ethics violations in 44 cases - "worse than expected"

Started by TC · · Last activity · 1 post · 268 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
8 August 2005
Last activity
8 August 2005
Original author
TC
Posts
1
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
268
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–1 of 1
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/business/biotech/20050714-0848-nih-ethicslapses.html

    NIH finds ethics violations in 44 cases

    By Kevin Freking
    ASSOCIATED PRESS

    8:48 a.m. July 14, 2005

    WASHINGTON - Forty-four government scientists who also worked as
    consultants for drug companies violated agency regulations designed to
    prevent conflicts of interest, a review by the National Institutes of
    Health shows.
    The review centered on whether the scientists had properly disclosed
    their work for the drug companies on financial disclosure forms,
    whether they had prior approval to do such work from their superiors
    and whether they took personal leave to do private work. In the 44
    cases, scientists were found to have violated one or more existing NIH
    rules.

    In an additional 37 cases reviewed, scientists did have prior approval
    for their work, had properly reported the work on their financial
    disclosure forms and took approved leave when necessary, the NIH
    reported.

    The House Energy and Commerce Committee asked for the review when it
    compared NIH records to consulting agreements maintained by 20
    pharmaceutical companies. It found 81 cases between 1999 and 2004 where
    the agreements were not listed in the NIH records provided to the
    committee. It asked NIH to investigate those cases.

    Even as NIH investigated those cases, NIH Director Elias Zerhouni
    issued a ban on NIH employees consulting with drug and biotechnology
    companies. The agency also issued ethics rules that it is monitoring
    before making permanent.

    The chairman of the committee, Rep. Joe Barton, R-Texas, said the
    agency's findings revealed the ethics problems at NIH were worse than
    he had anticipated.

    "These findings indicate that the ethical problems are more systemic
    and severe than previously known," Barton said. "They also demonstrate
    the need for NIH to issue the final ethics rule as soon as possible."

    Of the 44 scientists found to have violated agency rules, 36 are still
    employed at NIH and have been referred for possible disciplinary
    action. Nine of those thirty-six have also been referred to the HHS
    Office of Inspector General for investigation of possible criminal
    violations.

    Zerhouni made the details of the NIH investigation known in a letter to
    the committee dated July 8. The findings were released, despite
    Zerhouni asking that they be treated as confidential.

    "You have my pledge that I will continue to work with the committee on
    this matter as we move forward by correcting deficiencies and ensuring
    public trust," Zerhouni said.

    Committee leaders released the data and letter anyway because of the
    compelling public interest, said Kevin Schweers, a spokesman for the
    panel.

    ****

    TC

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.