General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Glycemic index, glycemic load and risk of prostate cancer

Started by C.Health · · Last activity · 1 post · 295 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
3 September 2005
Last activity
3 September 2005
Original author
C.Health
Posts
1
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
295
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–1 of 1
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Ab
    stract&list_uids=15382070&itool=iconabstr&query_hl=4

    Department of Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of
    Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

    Dietary carbohydrates have different glycemic and insulinemic potentials
    depending on type (glycemic index, GI) and amount (glycemic load, GL) of
    carbohydrate consumed or both. Insulin in turn has been implicated as a risk
    factor for several cancers, including that of the prostate. We assessed the
    relationship of GI and GL with prostate cancer risk in a multicenter
    case-control study. Cases and controls were recruited between 1991 and 2002
    in the network of major teaching and general hospitals in 4 Italian areas.
    Cases were 1,204 men (age range 46-74 years) admitted for incident,
    histologically confirmed prostate cancer. Controls were 1,352 men (age range
    46-74 years) admitted for acute, nonmalignant conditions unrelated to
    long-term modifications of diet. ORs of prostate cancer and the
    corresponding 95% CIs were derived using unconditional multiple logistic
    regression, including terms for age, study center, education, family history
    of prostate cancer, smoking, body mass index, physical activity, alcohol
    consumption, intake of energy, fiber and lycopenes. Compared to the lowest
    quintile of GI, the ORs were 1.23, 1.24, 1.47 and 1.57 for subsequent levels
    of GI. The corresponding values for GL were 0.91, 1.00, 1.20 and 1.41. No
    heterogeneity was found among strata of selected covariates. We found direct
    relations between dietary GI and GL and prostate cancer risk. Correcting for
    potential confounding factors did not substantially modify these
    associations.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.