General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Re: The Economic Eviction Of White Men

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 5 posts · 269 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
3 September 2005
Last activity
4 September 2005
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
5
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
269
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–5 of 5
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Halcitron said:

    http://www.vdare.com/roberts/low_wage.htm

    Paul Craig Roberts Archive Email a Friend...
    Printer Friendly Version...

    March 26, 2002

    Abolishing America (contd.): The Economic Eviction Of White Men
    By Paul Craig Roberts

    White males are suffering from long-term deterioration in lifetime
    income growth and job security, according to a study, "Divergent
    Paths," just released by the Russell Sage Foundation.

    The study by four academic sociologists and statisticians compares the
    wage growth and job security of young white males who entered the labor
    market in the late 1970s and early 1980s with the experience of a
    previous generation of young white males who entered the labor market
    in the mid-1960s. The study finds that 90 percent of young white male
    workers can expect to have lower lifetime wage growth than the previous
    generation.

    The study concludes that "upward mobility has deteriorated for young
    white men who entered the labor market in the 1980s." The change is
    significant and permanent, comprising "a massive downshift in earning
    standards" that has hollowed out the middle class and left large
    numbers of white males stuck in low wage service jobs that have no
    future.

    The trend is especially adverse for the 66 percent of the work force
    that never attains a four year college degree. However, even college
    graduates are experiencing difficulties. Although better off relative
    to other young white males, 65 percent of college graduates who began
    working in 1980 have experienced less income growth than college
    graduates who began their careers in the mid-1960s.

    The researchers have no satisfactory explanation for their worrisome
    findings. They point fingers at deregulation, corporate downsizing,
    decline of unionization, and a stagnant minimum wage and wander off
    into leftwing drivel about "the imbalance of power that is inherent
    in a capitalist system."

    A better explanation of the study's conclusion that the majority of
    white males "can no longer expect stable careers that lead to a
    solid, family-sustaining wage" is found in race and gender quotas,
    massive unskilled immigration, and in the way the U.S. practices "free
    trade."

    The study shows that women "experienced real wage growth during this
    period" when "earnings for male workers stagnated and even
    declined." In order to protect against U.S. Department of Justice
    (sic) lawsuits, every U.S. corporation has had to institutionalize race
    and gender quotas that discriminate against "over-represented"
    white males. These quotas have adversely impacted the upward mobility
    of white males.

    Massive unskilled immigration from third world countries greatly
    increases the labor supply and undercuts the wages of unskilled and
    low-skilled white males.

    Formerly, the U.S. practiced traditional trade. We imported what others
    produced best and exported what we produced best. Some traditional
    trade still takes place, but the U.S. also practices a new kind of
    trade.

    U.S. companies export unfinished and semi-finished materials to their
    factories in Mexico and China, where Mexican and Chinese workers add
    value. The goods are then exported back to the U.S. for sale to the
    American consumer. In this type of trade the U.S. will always run a
    deficit because what we "export" has lower value than what we
    "import."

    When goods cross borders they are measured as international trade, but
    such movements are really intra-firm trade that allows cheaper Mexican
    and Chinese labor to be substituted for U.S. labor. U.S. companies
    produce for the American consumer with foreign labor.

    The result is a decline in higher paying jobs in the U.S. as companies
    move higher value-added operations abroad to take advantage of cheaper
    labor.

    A recent Cornell University study, "The Impact of U.S.-China Trade
    Relations on Workers, Wages and Employment," [PDF 136 pages]
    concludes that U.S. companies shift their production to China in order
    to produce for the U.S. market with cheap Chinese labor. The study
    estimates that a minimum of 760,000 U.S. jobs have been lost to China
    since 1992.

    "An increasing percentage of the jobs leaving the U.S. are in
    higher-paying industries producing goods such as bicycles, furniture,
    motors, compressors, generators, fiber optics, clocks, injection
    molding and computer components." The shift in production is so
    extensive that the U.S. has run a trade deficit with China in advanced
    technology goods since 1995.

    China requires U.S. firms that want access to China's low cost labor
    to relocate Research & Development operations to China along with
    factories, thus replacing American designers, engineers and scientists
    with Chinese ones.

    White American males face deteriorating career prospects because: U.S.
    companies substitute foreign labor for U.S. labor, civil rights policy
    requires discrimination against white males in employment and
    promotion, and massive immigration drives down wages in construction,
    services and other employment. [See "Jobless White Males" by Peter
    Brimelow in Forbes. Link requires registration.]

    The end result of the job transfers will be a U.S. population too poor
    to purchase the products produced by cheap Chinese and Mexican labor.

    Paul Craig Roberts is the author of The Tyranny of Good Intentions :
    How Prosecutors and Bureaucrats Are Trampling the Constitution in the
    Name of Justice.

    COPYRIGHT CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.
    end

    :/
    Halcitron - Minuteman
    misc.survivalism

    "illegals are like the flies outside my window,
    if I didn't have screens, I'd have a house full of flies."

    alt.politics.immigration, misc.survivalism,
    soc.culture.mexican.american, ca.politics

    Who cares about Whitemen; the government and the media just love
    Blacks, Hispanics, gays, and females!

    John

  2. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    The end result of the job transfers will be a U.S. population too poor
    to purchase the products produced by cheap Chinese and Mexican labor.

    Paul Craig Roberts is the author of The Tyranny of Good Intentions :
    How Prosecutors and Bureaucrats Are Trampling the Constitution in the
    Name of Justice.

    COPYRIGHT CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.
    end

    Not so much "poor" but equalized with the rest of the world. As
    machines do more of the truly important labor (including thinking)
    there will come a time when most people are not really needed at all.
    The oligarchs will live lives of opulence beyond imagining. It isn't
    a big secret conspiracy. It is just the forces of history, greed,
    capitalism, socialism, selfishness, etc doing their job to a logical
    conclusion in the short term.

    Long term it could work out quite well.

    Oddly enough hackers will probably play a central role in the coming
    years. They will be the only ones able to move without being tracked
    24/7.

    --
    Is this thing on?

  3. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Halcitron said:

    http://www.vdare.com/roberts/low_wage.htm

    Paul Craig Roberts Archive Email a Friend...
    Printer Friendly Version...

    March 26, 2002

    Abolishing America (contd.): The Economic Eviction Of White Men
    By Paul Craig Roberts


    <snip>

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    The study concludes that "upward mobility has deteriorated for young
    white men who entered the labor market in the 1980s." The change is
    significant and permanent, comprising "a massive downshift in earning
    standards" that has hollowed out the middle class and left large
    numbers of white males stuck in low wage service jobs that have no
    future.

    Have you tried to interview recent high school graduates for a job opening
    nowadays? The reason they don't get good jobs is they have zero verbal and
    math skills.

    Get real: I'm not going to hire someone who'll embarrass my company and put
    him (or her) in front of my best customer.

  4. "Felix D." <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Halcitron said:

    http://www.vdare.com/roberts/low_wage.htm

    Paul Craig Roberts Archive Email a Friend...
    Printer Friendly Version...

    March 26, 2002

    Abolishing America (contd.): The Economic Eviction Of White Men
    By Paul Craig Roberts


    <snip>

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    The study concludes that "upward mobility has deteriorated for young
    white men who entered the labor market in the 1980s." The change is
    significant and permanent, comprising "a massive downshift in earning
    standards" that has hollowed out the middle class and left large
    numbers of white males stuck in low wage service jobs that have no
    future.

    Have you tried to interview recent high school graduates for a job opening
    nowadays? The reason they don't get good jobs is they have zero verbal


    and

    Quoted message said:

    math skills.

    Get real: I'm not going to hire someone who'll embarrass my company and


    put

    Quoted message said:

    him (or her) in front of my best customer.


    I think you mean they don't gots no verbal skills.....

  5. Kinda hard to tell the difference by looking at'em driving down the
    road all slouched down like one of the homeys. Purely the worst
    possible driving position for safe driving but theys gots to be "black"
    looking. Morons.

    I wouldn't hire idiots like that either.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.