General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Re: Semi-Homemade with Sandra Lee: Picnic of Doom 2

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 7 posts · 327 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
4 September 2005
Last activity
5 October 2005
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
7
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
327
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–7 of 7
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. On Sat, 03 Sep 2005 17:40:51 -0500, [email hidden] (Ubiquitous)

    Quoted message said:

    Sandra then struggles to move the cake to a cake pedestal and then tells us to
    pull the spatula out of the back of the round cake. Thank goodness for telling
    me that! I'd have just left it there all day otherwise! Sandra then tops the
    cake with the pilfered flowers, reminding us to remove them before serving
    because they're inedible -- does she mean the flowers or the cake?


    This is when I tuned in. What the hell was that thing she put the
    cake on? It looked like some old rusted out foot stool she found in
    her garage.

    Quoted message said:

    Sandra declares that her picnic-scape is based on poetry and Shakespeare, which
    sounds interesting, until the camera pulls back to reveal it in all its glory,
    at which point I am stunned. WTF? WTF?!?!? She dragged out a dinning room table
    and used a tapestry for a table cloth and dragged out a pair of big fancy
    apolstered recliners for sitting/reclining. On the table, she used faux metal
    plates and gushed that you can eat "right on top of them". I was seriously too
    stunned to take the rest in, but she apparently ripped out pages from a poetry
    book as napkin decorations and hung a candelabra of Liberace proportions from
    gawd knows where. She then tells us she has to run off to 'freshen up" and
    exits stage left with a wave.

    I wish we could have seen her drag her dining room table and living
    room chairs across the lawn. That would have been a show in itself.
    All to surprise her husband? Hmmmm, how many men did you have over to
    help move the furniture, Sandra? (I guess a couple of girlfriends
    could have done it, too, but my guess is Sandra would employ men to do
    that kind of job).

    I just don't understand those outfits with the giant sleeves. Or why
    she feels the need to cook in her "party clothes" at all. With all
    the coming and going she does before and after commercials, a change
    of clothes, before showing off the tablescape, would at least be a
    more realistic aspect of the show.

    pepsi

  2. in article [email hidden], [email hidden] at
    [email hidden] wrote on 9/4/05 6:01 AM:

    Quoted message said:

    On Sat, 03 Sep 2005 17:40:51 -0500, [email hidden] (Ubiquitous)

    Quoted message said:

    Sandra then struggles to move the cake to a cake pedestal and then tells us
    to
    pull the spatula out of the back of the round cake. Thank goodness for
    telling
    me that! I'd have just left it there all day otherwise! Sandra then tops the
    cake with the pilfered flowers, reminding us to remove them before serving
    because they're inedible -- does she mean the flowers or the cake?


    This is when I tuned in. What the hell was that thing she put the
    cake on? It looked like some old rusted out foot stool she found in
    her garage.

    She kept the chandelier on it

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    Sandra declares that her picnic-scape is based on poetry and Shakespeare,
    which
    sounds interesting, until the camera pulls back to reveal it in all its
    glory,
    at which point I am stunned. WTF? WTF?!?!? She dragged out a dinning room
    table
    and used a tapestry for a table cloth and dragged out a pair of big fancy
    apolstered recliners for sitting/reclining. On the table, she used faux metal
    plates and gushed that you can eat "right on top of them". I was seriously
    too
    stunned to take the rest in, but she apparently ripped out pages from a
    poetry
    book as napkin decorations and hung a candelabra of Liberace proportions from
    gawd knows where. She then tells us she has to run off to 'freshen up" and
    exits stage left with a wave.

    I wish we could have seen her drag her dining room table and living
    room chairs across the lawn. That would have been a show in itself.
    All to surprise her husband? Hmmmm, how many men did you have over to
    help move the furniture, Sandra? (I guess a couple of girlfriends
    could have done it, too, but my guess is Sandra would employ men to do
    that kind of job).

    I just don't understand those outfits with the giant sleeves. Or why
    she feels the need to cook in her "party clothes" at all. With all
    the coming and going she does before and after commercials, a change
    of clothes, before showing off the tablescape, would at least be a
    more realistic aspect of the show.

    Yes! It would be like THE LORETTA YOUNG show, where she does the half hour
    in civvies, and at the end comes down the stairs in a fabulous ball gown!

    IIRC, when they tried to syndicate reruns of the series, Ms Young sued to
    stop it on the grounds that the now out of fashion gowns made her look
    silly.

    Sigh.

    Quoted message said:


    pepsi

    --

    You Can't Stop the Signal

  3. In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden]

    Quoted message said:

    I just don't understand those outfits with the giant sleeves.

    Oh, she wears those for special occassions, such as when she's frying
    something.

    --
    WARNING!!!
    Use of these recipes may be hazardous to your health, food budget,
    standing in your community and liver function. Use at your own risk!! We
    assume no liability from any illness or injury sustained while eating the
    "food" or being exposed to crapass tablescapes. And no, we're not sure
    where she grew up either. The Cordon Bleu disavows any knowlege of Miss Lee.

  4. In article said:

    IIRC, when they tried to syndicate reruns of the series, Ms Young sued to
    stop it on the grounds that the now out of fashion gowns made her look
    silly.

    Sigh.

    Alas, practically everything Ms Lee wears makes her look silly.

    --
    WARNING!!!
    Use of these recipes may be hazardous to your health, food budget,
    standing in your community and liver function. Use at your own risk!! We
    assume no liability from any illness or injury sustained while eating the
    "food" or being exposed to crapass tablescapes. And no, we're not sure
    where she grew up either. The Cordon Bleu disavows any knowlege of Miss Lee.

  5. Most of the men I know watch SL for her [censored],I didn't think anyone
    actually paid attention to what she did on the show.To paraphrase(?)
    Noel Coward ,my opinion of her show is that its a display of the
    uneatable by the unspeakable.If I wanted to watch a woman waving her
    [censored] over food I would prefer to watch Julia Childs.
    I stand corrected,obviously people do pay detailed attention.I thought
    her show was basically open can,place on platter,pretend you made it
    from scratch,but then I am not really a fan of the show.I will watch it
    from now on because it seems to be so hilarious.

  6. in article [email hidden], Ubiquitous at
    [email hidden] wrote on 10/5/05 2:06 AM:

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden]

    Quoted message said:

    I just don't understand those outfits with the giant sleeves.

    Oh, she wears those for special occassions, such as when she's frying
    something.

    She wears them to convince people how skilled she is as handling her
    materials.

    --

    You Can't Stop the Signal

  7. in article [email hidden], terri at
    [email hidden] wrote on 10/5/05 6:34 AM:

    Quoted message said:

    Most of the men I know watch SL for her [censored],

    You misunderstood -- we watch her because she IS a [censored].

    When it comes to breasts, I prefer quality to quantity.

    I didn't think anyone

    Quoted message said:

    actually paid attention to what she did on the show.To paraphrase(?)
    Noel Coward ,my opinion of her show is that its a display of the
    uneatable by the unspeakable.If I wanted to watch a woman waving her
    [censored] over food I would prefer to watch Julia Childs.

    And there goes the appetite!

    Quoted message said:

    I stand corrected,obviously people do pay detailed attention.I thought
    her show was basically open can,place on platter,pretend you made it
    from scratch,but then I am not really a fan of the show.I will watch it
    from now on because it seems to be so hilarious.

    Indeed, and with our friends commentary, it is that much more so.

    Welcome to the clan!

    Quoted message said:

    --

    You Can't Stop the Signal

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.