OT (Political humor) -- Bush in New Orleans

George Bush is not Low Carb.
"Marengo" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:Zt1We.3199$GK2.76@lakeread07...

Quoted message said:

Here's an example of what they didn't show on Fox News in the aftermath of
hurricane Katrina:

http://users.thelink.net/marengo/bush

A.D.C wrote:
|| George Bush is not Low Carb.

|| "Marengo" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
|| news:Zt1We.3199$GK2.76@lakeread07...
||| Here's an example of what they didn't show on Fox News in the
||| aftermath of hurricane Katrina:
|||
|||
||| http://users.thelink.net/marengo/bush

Well, ADC, at least I followed Usenet protocol and put "OT" on my subject
line. Unlike you, who top-posted your rude and ill-informed comment.
--
Peter
~~~~
THE BUSHES IN NEW ORLEANS: THE PICTURE FOX NEWS WOULDN'T LET US SEE:

http://users.thelink.net/marengo/bush

In article said:

George Bush is not Low Carb.

Quite right--he's got oatmeal for brains.
--
D.F. Manno | [email hidden]
The worst government is the most moral. One composed of cynics is often
very tolerant and humane. But when fanatics are on top there is no limit
to oppression.--H.L. Mencken, "Minority Report" (1956)

Marengo said:

Here's an example of what they didn't show on Fox News in the aftermath of
hurricane Katrina:

http://users.thelink.net/marengo/bush

Da Pres confesses!:

http://www.allhatnocattle.net/bush_sucks.jpg

Meanwhile At the scene:

http://www.intriguing.com/mp/_pictures/grail/large/HolyGrail 005.jpg

http://arago4.tn.utwente.nl/stonedead/movies/holy-grail/ra/0 2-01.ra

http://www.intriguing.com/mp/_pictures/grail/large/HolyGrail 003.jpg

http://arago4.tn.utwente.nl/stonedead/movies/holy-grail/ra/0 2-02.ra

http://arago4.tn.utwente.nl/stonedead/movies/holy-grail/scen e-02.html

Celebrate Bush's NewOrleans with a memorial shirt:

http://arago4.tn.utwente.nl/stonedead/movies/holy-grail/scen e-02.html

http://www.cafepress.com/allhat.30833858

dude..oops..see below...
"Marengo" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:pCFWe.5476$GK2.3687@lakeread07...

Quoted message said:

A.D.C wrote:
|| George Bush is not Low Carb.

|| "Marengo" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
|| news:Zt1We.3199$GK2.76@lakeread07...
||| Here's an example of what they didn't show on Fox News in the
||| aftermath of hurricane Katrina:
|||
|||
||| http://users.thelink.net/marengo/bush

Well, ADC, at least I followed Usenet protocol and put "OT" on my subject
line. Unlike you, who top-posted your rude and ill-informed comment.
--
Peter
~~~~
THE BUSHES IN NEW ORLEANS: THE PICTURE FOX NEWS WOULDN'T LET US SEE:

http://users.thelink.net/marengo/bush

dude..i like the "OT"...thansk for doing that, BTW...never have understood
why top posting is consiered "rude." I thread my messages, so i don't want
to have to scroll through every post i've read to see the new ones. just a
personal preference, I guess. i'll try to conform..error..error..does not
com...$%^&*....just kidding..thanks for the etiquitte tip.

He's wrong anyway.

Top posting is perfectly acceptable.

--
Most people are dumb as bricks; some people are dumber than that. -- MFW

"A.D.C" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

dude..oops..see below...
"Marengo" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:pCFWe.5476$GK2.3687@lakeread07...

Quoted message said:

A.D.C wrote:
|| George Bush is not Low Carb.

|| "Marengo" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
|| news:Zt1We.3199$GK2.76@lakeread07...
||| Here's an example of what they didn't show on Fox News in the
||| aftermath of hurricane Katrina:
|||
|||
||| http://users.thelink.net/marengo/bush

Well, ADC, at least I followed Usenet protocol and put "OT" on my subject
line. Unlike you, who top-posted your rude and ill-informed comment.
--
Peter
~~~~
THE BUSHES IN NEW ORLEANS: THE PICTURE FOX NEWS WOULDN'T LET US SEE:

http://users.thelink.net/marengo/bush

dude..i like the "OT"...thansk for doing that, BTW...never have understood
why top posting is consiered "rude." I thread my messages, so i don't want
to have to scroll through every post i've read to see the new ones. just
a personal preference, I guess. i'll try to conform..error..error..does
not com...$%^&*....just kidding..thanks for the etiquitte tip.

In article <[email hidden]>,

JC Der Koenig said:

He's wrong anyway.

Top posting is perfectly acceptable.

Only on the binaries groups where there is a good reason for it...
Anywhere else, and it's considered rude coming from one that knows
better. ;-)

Cheers JC and have a good weekend!
--
Om.

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-[censored]." -Jack Nicholson

Top posting is perfectly acceptable.

--
Most people are dumb as bricks; some people are dumber than that. -- MFW

"OmManiPadmeOmelet" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

JC Der Koenig said:

He's wrong anyway.

Top posting is perfectly acceptable.

Only on the binaries groups where there is a good reason for it...
Anywhere else, and it's considered rude coming from one that knows
better. ;-)

Cheers JC and have a good weekend!
--
Om.

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-[censored]." -Jack
Nicholson

One of the few times I agree with you, certainly more acceptable than
not snipping for relevance when bottom posting IMO. Is there anything
more annoying than scrolling through several long posts just to see an
"I agree?" :-)

--
Cheri

JC Der Koenig wrote in message ...

Quoted message said:

Top posting is perfectly acceptable.

"OmManiPadmeOmelet" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

JC Der Koenig said:

Top posting is perfectly acceptable.

Only on the binaries groups where there is a good reason for it...

Agreed

Quoted message said:

Anywhere else, and it's considered rude...

I hate top-posting, however... It is not rude. Top posting is awkward and
people who prefer to top-post are in the minority. It creates an
inconvenience for most people... but some people actually prefer to see
top-posts.

I look at it like this. Let's say you are in charge of a sewer construction
project and have to dig up one street on order to complete the project. Do
you dig up the biggest street with the most traffic, or a smaller street
which gets much less traffic? As a rule of thumb, if you have to
inconvenience people, you try to convenience as few as possible; therefore
you dig up the smaller street. If you dig up the bigger street because your
own house happens to be on the smaller street and you don't want to
inconvenience yourself, then you might be considered selfish and
inconsiderate.

If you top-post, you inconvenience the cast majority of people, who are
bottom-posters, for the convenience of yourself and a few other top-posters.
You're digging up a major thoroughfare instead of a small street because
your house is on the small street.

Now, if you are not aware that most people bottom-post and expect others to
do the same, then you could hardly be called selfish or inconsiderate. If
on the other hand you are aware of this and you still top-post, then it
could be that selfishness and lack of consideration for others are parts of
your personality.