General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Waistline better risk predictor than BMI?

Started by T · · Last activity · 4 posts · 250 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
20 September 2005
Last activity
22 September 2005
Original author
T
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
250
Views / 30 days
6

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. http://tinyurl.com/9glsc

    Smith said the findings show the need for more education to increase awareness.
    People know that being overweight or obese increase the odds of heart disease
    and stroke but where the fat is deposited is important.

    Being overweight or obese is calculated by using body mass index (BMI) --
    dividing weight in kilograms by height in metres squared. A BMI of more than 25
    is overweight. Above 30 is considered obese.

    But weight around the middle, or abdominal obesity, has been shown to be a more
    accurate indicator because it is also linked to other risk factors for heart
    disease including high cholesterol, type 2 diabetes and raised blood pressure.

  2. BMI is only valid for average height people (5'4" - 6'2"😉.
    Thats because one's weight grows nearly the cube of one's
    height and BMI is a squared formula. The number is meaningless
    for children and large athletes.

  3. T said:

    http://tinyurl.com/9glsc

    Considering BMI isn't even a very good predictor of
    fatness, sure.

    --Blair
    "Anything is."

  4. rick++ said:

    BMI is only valid for average height people (5'4" - 6'2"😉.
    Thats because one's weight grows nearly the cube of one's
    height and BMI is a squared formula. The number is meaningless
    for children and large athletes.

    BMI has no input for any dimension of width or density.

    Might as well be using hair length as a gauge of fatness.

    --Blair
    "No, it won't work either."

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.