Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Does skipping spokes work when wheel building?

Started by Veggie · · Last activity · 6 posts · 710 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
22 November 2005
Last activity
26 November 2005
Original author
Veggie
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
710
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I have a pair of 36 hole hubs that I'd like to use. If I end up with
    32h rims, that would mean I need to skip a few spokes. Does this work,
    or is this asking for trouble?

  2. It can be done, but it will not be easy calculating the correct spoke
    lengths. What is the problem getting 36 spoke rims? I can certainly
    supply you with some or build a wheel around your hubs. email me if
    that might be of interest.

    Nigel Grinter
    Well-Spoken Wheels Inc.
    ([email hidden])

  3. Veggie said:

    I have a pair of 36 hole hubs that I'd like to use. If I end up with
    32h rims, that would mean I need to skip a few spokes. Does this work,
    or is this asking for trouble?

    If you're building it radial, you won't have any problems (building it,
    that is). As the spoke pattern becomes more tangential (that is, from
    2- to 3- or 4-cross), the more different lengths of spokes you'll need.
    In a worst case, you could have insufficient thread engagement or
    spokes protruding out the bottom of the nipple. You *should* be able to
    make it work, though.

    What do you mean by "If I end up with 32h rims"? If you don't have the
    rims yet, why not buy 36-hole rims to match your hubs? The price will
    be the same, and the wheels will end up an insignificant amount
    heavier.

    Jeff

  4. Veggie said:

    I have a pair of 36 hole hubs that I'd like to use. If I end up with
    32h rims, that would mean I need to skip a few spokes. Does this work,
    or is this asking for trouble?

    I would not recommend it. Just find a 36h rim, they are plentiful,
    regardless of what some mailorder places say.

  5. In article <[email hidden]>,

    JeffWills said:
    Veggie said:

    I have a pair of 36 hole hubs that I'd like to use. If I end up with
    32h rims, that would mean I need to skip a few spokes. Does this work,
    or is this asking for trouble?

    If you're building it radial, you won't have any problems (building it,
    that is). As the spoke pattern becomes more tangential (that is, from
    2- to 3- or 4-cross), the more different lengths of spokes you'll need.
    In a worst case, you could have insufficient thread engagement or
    spokes protruding out the bottom of the nipple. You *should* be able to
    make it work, though.

    Built up a wheelset a couple months ago using 48h hubs mated to 36h
    rims - front wheel: radial; rear: 3X drive, radial non-drive. On both
    counts I can validate your observations. For the front, the standard
    spoke length calculation for a 0x lacing pattern applied, as there was
    so little deviation in the spokes' tangents.

    The rear drive side required more forethought. Drive side lacing was of
    three different lengths of spokes: 6 of the calculated (base) length
    required for 3X lacing; 6 -2mm shorter; and 6 +2mm longer. In my case
    the mismatched hub/rim hole count produced a lacing pattern that
    resulted in six 3 spoke sets per flange, with every fourth hole
    remaining unlaced.

    I'm very happy with the results, but the (rear driveside) build
    entailed particular attention to which spokes wound up in which holes -
    marking the hub's holes beforehand with differently coloured sharpies
    simplified matters.

    Once all the spokes are in their designated holes - and if you've
    calculated correctly - tensioning, stress relieving, etc.. is similar
    to a wheel built from a hub/rim combo of equal spoke holes; with the
    only difference for me being, that when initially taking up slack in
    the spokes, it precluded the convenience of using the amount of exposed
    spoke thread for roughly gauging that all the spokes had an equal
    starting point prior to tensioning.

    But I wouldn't recommend building a wheel from a mismatched hub and rim
    if it can be avoided. That is, to seek out a 32h rim with the express
    intention of lacing it to a 36h hub, is to invite needless
    complication. However, if the parts are gathering dust in your closet,
    and you're up for a project....

    Luke

  6. Luke said:

    But I wouldn't recommend building a wheel from a mismatched hub and rim

    if it can be avoided. That is, to seek out a 32h rim with the express
    intention of lacing it to a 36h hub, is to invite needless
    complication. However, if the parts are gathering dust in your closet,
    and you're up for a project....


    That seems to be the consensus. It seems like 32h and 28h are more
    common these days. I have a pair of 36h Shimano hubs that I would like
    to use, but 36h are harder to come by and cost more.

    I guess the extra work to get 36h rims is well worth it 😉

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.