Road Cycling · Public discussion

Trek 7700FX

Started by Sstangler · · Last activity · 5 posts · 5,215 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
23 January 2003
Last activity
23 January 2003
Original author
Sstangler
Posts
5
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
5,215
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–5 of 5
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I bought the Trek 7700FX last year. I only test rode the Trek 7500 and 7700, as I knew I wanted a
    high end hybrid and the did not have any of the Cannondales. (The Trek Cyclocross bikes were out of
    my price range.) There is quite a bit of difference between the two Treks. The 7500 is built a bit
    more like a MTB, the gearing and frame angles seemed to me a lot like my old Trek 7000 MTB. I don't
    know a lot about components, but I think the 7700 has a lot better components as well, and the
    geometry is a bit more like a touring bike. It only took a short ride on each for me to tell which
    one I wanted, so I recommend you do the same. I've been so happy with mine that my husband is
    thinking of buying the 2003 7700FX, and it looks pretty slick. The Cane Creek bar ends are awesome,
    and this year the 7700 (at least the one we looked at) had Shimano clipless pedals. (That's my next
    purchase if anyone has any recommendations.)

    Good luck!

    Shana Germantown, WI Training for my 1st Century!

  2. The 7700FX looks to be a nice bike for the cross/aggressive hybrid. I'm looking for a similar new
    ride - one LBS this weekend pointed out the '03 Raleigh C700 which has a nice component set for
    significantly less bucks ($650).

    "SStangler" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I bought the Trek 7700FX last year. I only test rode the Trek 7500 and


    7700,

    Quoted message said:

    as I knew I wanted a high end hybrid and the did not have any of the Cannondales. (The Trek
    Cyclocross bikes were out of my price range.)


    There is

    Quoted message said:

    quite a bit of difference between the two Treks. The 7500 is built a bit


    more

    Quoted message said:

    like a MTB, the gearing and frame angles seemed to me a lot like my old


    Trek

    Quoted message said:

    7000 MTB. I don't know a lot about components, but I think the 7700 has a


    lot

    Quoted message said:

    better components as well, and the geometry is a bit more like a touring


    bike.

    Quoted message said:

    It only took a short ride on each for me to tell which one I wanted, so I recommend you do the
    same. I've been so happy with mine that my husband


    is

    Quoted message said:

    thinking of buying the 2003 7700FX, and it looks pretty slick. The Cane


    Creek

    Quoted message said:

    bar ends are awesome, and this year the 7700 (at least the one we looked


    at)

    Quoted message said:

    had Shimano clipless pedals. (That's my next purchase if anyone has any recommendations.)

    Good luck!

    Shana Germantown, WI Training for my 1st Century!

  3. The Cane Creek

    Quoted message said:

    bar ends are awesome, and this year the 7700 (at least the one we looked at) had Shimano clipless
    pedals. (That's my next purchase if anyone has any recommendations.)

    cheap interim solution:

    pair of toeclips and straps. Twelve bucks US, maximum.

    Advantages:

    -cheap -increased efficiency over no clips at all -no slipping off the pedals in the rain -can ride
    in normal shoes.

    pity you didn't go for a dropped-bar bike, but oh well. There are other options, besides the Trek
    520, after all: the Fuji Touring or Jamis Aurora are great deals.

    bon courage!

    -Luigi

  4. [email hidden] (Luigi de Guzman) wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    The Cane Creek

    Quoted message said:

    bar ends are awesome, and this year the 7700 (at least the one we looked at) had Shimano
    clipless pedals. (That's my next purchase if anyone has any recommendations.)

    cheap interim solution:

    pair of toeclips and straps. Twelve bucks US, maximum.

    Advantages:

    -cheap -increased efficiency over no clips at all -no slipping off the pedals in the rain -can
    ride in normal shoes.

    pity you didn't go for a dropped-bar bike, but oh well. There are other options, besides the Trek
    520, after all: the Fuji Touring or Jamis Aurora are great deals.

    bon courage!

    -Luigi

    Oh, I have toe clips, and they are fine, but I'm one of those that needs the equipment to keep me
    motivated. I'm sure there were plenty of other options for touring bikes, but I was set on a Trek as
    I've had such great experience with them in the past, and also set on a hybrid so I could do around
    the town riding with my kids, as well as longer distances.

  5. Quoted message said:

    Oh, I have toe clips, and they are fine, but I'm one of those that needs the equipment to keep me
    motivated.

    Gear guzzling--it can happen to anyone. *grin*

    My gear appetite tends to rather small things lately; next thing to get (soon as I get a free minute
    to ride down to the cycle shop) will be a nice reflective trouser clip. Not so much because of the
    visibility; that's a plus. It just saves my trouser cuffs from getting all nasty from the chain. (so
    far haven't needed to ride in anything exceedingly smart, clothingwise, anyway; grad students,
    especially on bikes, are never expected to be the greatest exponents of sartorial excess, anyway)

    Good weather and a buzz would keep me motivated. And on my longest ride to date, the prospect of
    blueberry pancakes motivated me pretty well. Mostly, though, I stay on the bike as a result of
    bloody mindedness: this is how I get around, or try to, when it's handiest.

    Quoted message said:

    I'm sure there were plenty of other options for touring bikes, but I was set on a Trek as I've had
    such great experience with them in the past, and also set on a hybrid so I could do around the town
    riding with my kids, as well as longer distances.

    Tourer's aren't just for distance! I dig mine for anything from the long day ride (over 50 miles)
    or the quick spin to pick up the papers (under 2 miles). straight flat bars are not for
    me--uncomfortable. even my POS 3-speed here in London (necessarily a POS, as it has to be parked
    outside permanently, and would be stolen otherwise) has quasi-moustache 'bars. (with bar tape!
    very comfy!)

    This will brand me as hopelessly fredly, but I think that the clipless pedals on a bike that you
    intend to use for 'going around town' might asymptotically approach a 'bad idea.' You want to get on
    the bike and go, you should be able to just get on the bike and go. Strapping on new shoes (or, for
    the mentalist, drilling holes in *all* your existing shoes to take cleats...surely this is
    possible/has been done?) just to pick up a paper and a loaf of bread strikes me as really silly. And
    bike shoes generally would look out of place at church on sunday...

    I'll go clipless, eventually, but for longer distances, on a 'gofastfar' bike. Right now, the Aurora
    really needs a pair of MKS platform pedals (conveniently hanging on a peg at the bike shop down the
    road, but then, inconveniently, the shop and road and I am in England, and the Aurora's back in
    Virginia...)

    -Luigi

    "We must not become complacent over any success. We should check our complacency and constantly
    criticize our shortcomings, just as we should wash our faces or sweep the floor every day to remove
    the dirt and keep them clean."

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.