Re: Non-Whites telling Whites to be White

Alcibiades said:

Millard is a tad race-obsessed, so far as his choice of topic usually
goes. But that's alright, we are on the Killing Floor now and need all
the truth-speaking we can get from people who write well. I have
myself been taken aback a few times by non-hispanic immigrants and
visitors doing exactly this - Telling American Whites to pull their
collective head out of their ass and be themselves again in the face
of racial attack by interlopers and inferiors. I've had non-whites
(East Indians, specifically), tell me this.

http://www.newnation.org/Millard/Non-whites-telling-Whites.html

NON-WHITES TELLING WHITES TO BE WHITE-- SOMEONE HAS TO DO IT!
by H. Millard © 2005

How race whipped are many Whites today? How long is a string?

I think many non-Whites are bemused, bewildered and sometimes
irritated at the timid way Whites act in regard to race and wish that
Whites would just get over it and be who they are and be proud of it.
I would liken this feeling to the creepy one we sometimes have when
we're around a bunch of mewling cowards.

In a story that sounds as though it sprouted legs and escaped from a
certain tea party and crawled out of a rabbit hole, the Church of
England has named a guy named John Sentamu as the Archbishop of York.
Some of the things Sentamu has said--such as his attacks on
multiculturalism--would probably make many timid Whites feel a little
uneasy and want to take a few steps away from him lest that birds of a
feather thing get the tongue cluckers out in force. Some other Whites
might even want to get aracial brownie points by loudly and
self-righteously proclaiming, to anyone who will listen, that Sentamu
has made White supremacist statements and, by golly, they're going to
speak out against that kind of White person.

So how did outspoken John Sentamu get the big gig in this loony PC
Dark Age? Easy. Sentamu is not English. He's not European. He's not
White. He's African. He's Black. He's so black that he's almost
purple. Indeed, he's so dark that some might say he looks like hole in
the universe in the shape of a man.

And, what does Sentamu do as soon as he gets the attention of the
press? Why, he Mau Maus the English people for denying their history
and national identity. Huh? You read that right. You're not alone if
you're starting to feel a little topsy turvy. Of course, the maddening
thing is that Sentamu is correct. Ironically, he's also a living
example of his argument that the British don't know much about their
history or their national identity or, to go even further, about
genes. If they did, they wouldn't have appointed him to his position.

I'm not black like Sentamu, so perhaps the Brits won't politely listen
to me as I tell them the truth. But, let's give it a try. With simple
sentences. See folks, you English are a European people. You are a
White people. Your history, your culture and your national identity
are all wrapped up with your genes. Ah, see, that's what makes you
what you are. Got that so far? Sentamu, on the other hand, is not
English. His genes are different. Get it? Can you see that he does not
look English? So, why did you English appoint an African as an
Archbishop of the Church of England? I mean, it's not called the
Church of Africa.

Maybe Sentamu is one of the few men in the Church of England with any
life force in him and maybe that's why he got the job. Maybe the
sissies gravitated to someone with vigor, even if he isn't really one
of them. Perhaps, in their minds, because he speaks English, they can
pretend he is English and this makes them feel like men again. Anyway,
Sentamu spoke like a real Englishman with gonads and that's what they
want, even though he's not a real Englishman. Sentamu also told the
English that they need to reconnect with their roots to avoid further
political extremism. Well, geez, if the Brits reconnect with their
real roots they'll boot Sentamu off the friggin' island. Or, maybe
not. After all, the English can't seem to understand that Sentamu
isn't one of them.

Another example of a non-White telling Whites to stop being neurotic
sissies and to be what they are and to be proud of it, came from a
Comanche Indian named David Yeagley who teaches some college classes
someplace or other and who has some columns on the internet. In
"What's Up With White Women," Yeagley writes about how he was
disturbed when a White female student, who he calls Rachel, praised
Indians but at the same time knocked her fellow Whites by saying "My
race is nothing." Yeagley then writes, "But I don't feel so proud when
I listen to Rachel. It gives me no solace to see the white man
self-destruct. If Rachel's people are 'nothing,' what does that say
about mine? "

Yeagley is right. But why does it take an Indian to tell the truth
about our Rachels? Why aren't more Whites writing about people like
Rachel? Why do we so often calmly accept the self-haters among us? Why
don't we tell them that we don't want to hear their rot. Their
self-hatred is more than just a matter of their individual rights.
When they hate themselves, they hate all of us. Our gene pool is the
joint possession of all Whites. Any Whites who harm it, harm all of
us. And, harm often starts with evil words.

In a slightly different but also similar vein, Thomas Sowell, who is
Black, had a column recently in which he wrote about how people tend
to self-sort by race and all manner of other things such as education
and IQ, and that government should butt out and stop social
engineering by forcing people on each other. That's not something that
many Whites would be able to write in the main stream press where
Sowell's columns run. When Sam Francis wrote similar things, his
columns were cancelled. And, maybe that sort of social pressure
regarding racial matters put on Whites, often by other Whites, is one
of the main reasons that Whites have become as scared as frightened
mice about race and society and life itself.

Maybe that's part of the reason why Whites have become an old and
decrepit race with one collective foot in the grave. Maybe that's part
of the reason that Whites lack the generative force needed to keep
being a vital expanding people. It certainly seems part of why our
birth rate is so low. We have become a people of winter, not spring.

But, here's a deeper truth about all this that many may not realize.
It is we ourselves, we White people, who are tamping down our internal
flames. We have put a psychological cap on them. We are holding
ourselves back. In a way, we're a people like the guy in the old
Werewolf movies who tries to control what's inside him by locking
himself in a jail cell when the moon is full.

It's time we awakened and let our inner White people be as nature
intended. We have the power in our minds to change our winter to
spring, but it's going to take a lot of effort on our part to learn to
uncap those internal flames of the life force that once burned so
brightly that we conquered this whole brown planet and didn't bother
saying, "May we please?"

Good article. It's hard to deny that the typical White male has become a line-toeing fat PC wimp. All those big belt buckles bear against the belly of a [censored].

Jay