General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

=> There is hope <=

Started by Hank · · Last activity · 31 posts · 803 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
7 December 2005
Last activity
10 December 2005
Original author
Hank
Posts
31
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
803
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 31
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. http://www.commondreams.org/views05/1205-30.htm

    Published on Monday, December 5, 2005 by the Seattle
    Post-Intelligencer
    Mr. Bush, Have I Got An Exit Strategy For You
    by Gus R. Stelzer

    Despite much talk about an exit strategy from the Iraq quagmire in
    which our nation is embroiled, the No. 1 exit strategy has not been
    proposed. Let me fill that void. First you have a right to know where
    I'm coming from.

    When I reached the legal voting age of 21 in 1936, I voted for
    Republican Alfred Landon against Franklin D. Roosevelt. I continued
    voting Republican through 1980, when I founded a PAC in San Diego with
    my own money to help Ronald Reagan defeat Jimmy Carter.

    But I didn't vote for Reagan in 1984 because of his misguided trade
    and fiscal policies.

    Whereas the United States enjoyed a $28 billion trade surplus and only
    $700 billion in federal debt in the previous 36 years, in eight years
    Reagan piled up $1.042 trillion in trade deficits and $1.692 trillion
    in federal debt. That was 186 percent more than all 39 prior presidents.

    I haven't voted for a Republican or Democrat candidate since because I
    have no desire to vote for the lesser of two evils. I retired in 1976
    as a senior executive of General Motors, with responsibility for more
    than 35,000 employees, and have been a member of the World Affairs
    Council, the Institute for the Americas at the University of
    California, the Advisory Board of the School of Education at the
    University of San Diego, a Rotary Club president, etc. I've traveled
    widely and lived in many states.

    Any CEO of a corporation who screwed up as many things as George W.
    Bush would have been fired by its board of directors. Here's a few:

    - Invasion of Iraq, which is the biggest strategic blunder and scandal
    in U.S. history. Saddam Hussein never initiated a belligerent act of
    aggression or terrorism against us. The buildup to that war was based
    on fabrications, deception and lies.

    - Death of 2,100 U.S. soldiers, wounding 15,000 more, and the death of
    30,000 innocent Iraqi men, women and children.

    - Immoral and unconstitutional trade policies that caused $2.824
    trillion in trade deficits in just five years.

    - The worst fiscal performance in our history, piling up $2.472
    trillion in added federal debt in five years en route to a major
    economic collapse.

    - Tax policies that are an insult to working people who make dividends
    possible but who are required to pay a higher marginal tax rate than
    those who collect dividends without working.

    - Foreign policies that have alienated most of the rest of the world.
    - A misguided attempt to turn future Social Security pensions over to
    Wall Street.
    In typical arrogance, Bush said we must stay the course in the Iraq
    war, which means continuing his tragic record while killing and
    wounding more U.S. soldiers. That has no more credibility than to say
    a fox should be put in charge of maintaining order in a hen house
    after he has just created mayhem therein. Earlier this year, Terri
    Schiavo lay in a permanent coma connected to a feeding tube. Her
    husband said she would have wanted that tube removed. But Republican
    members of Congress passed a resolution to maintain the tube, causing
    Bush to fly from his ranch in Texas to Washington to sign that
    legislation. As his pen was poised to sign the document, Bush said,
    "If there is an error in this matter, it is best to err on the side of
    life." Why didn't Bush make that same judgment in early 2003 when
    millions of Americans protested against a possible invasion of Iraq,
    as did many foreign leaders? Bush had no qualms about killing and
    wounding thousands of soldiers and innocent civilians. In view of his
    miserable record, his arrogant lack of good judgment and his failure
    to understand the gravity of his record, President Bush (and Vice
    President [censored] Cheney) should be shown the exit door with a proviso to
    never darken the Oval Office again. That should be exit strategy No.
    1! I was a Republican, but never a knee-jerk Republican.

  2. "Hank" <"impeach"@bu$h.gov> wrote

    Quoted message said:

    Mr. Bush, Have I Got An Exit Strategy For You
    by Gus R. Stelzer


    I have a simple one - bring back Saddam.


  3. Quoted message said:

    Mr. Bush, Have I Got An Exit Strategy For You

    It's all about the 2008 strategy... how???

    Democrats are pushing for Bush to bring home the troops because
    they do not wish to be holding the bag in 2008... that's why the
    Republicans have everything to gain in keeping the troops in Iraq for
    the next two years... not to mention you don't leave friendly bases...
    (remember Japan Germany and Korea???) so when the Democrats win
    the White House in 2008 they will be responsible for pulling out the
    troops and that means they have to answer for the collapse... and if
    America is attacked (heaven forbid) the Republicans will kill the
    Democrats in the polls for being weak on terrorism...(remember weak
    on Commieisum) net result??? Democrats loose the election in 2012...
    net gain??? Republicans rule for another 8 years... so out of 20 years
    the score will be Republican 16 Democrats 4... that's why I'm voting
    for the Democrats in 2008... it's good strategy...

    Larry L
    94 RC45 #2
    Have a wheelie NICE day...
    Lean & Mean it in every corner of your life...
    If it wasn't for us the fast lane would rust...
    V4'S are music to the seat of my pants...
    1952 De Havilland Chipmunk...
    Yank and bank your brains loose...
    http://members.ebay.com/aboutme/-xlax-/
    http://home.comcast.net/~netters2/
    http://www.fox302.com/index.pl?s=vg&user=netters2
    http://www.reeky.org/gallery/xlax

  4. Vito said:

    "Hank" <"impeach"@bu$h.gov> wrote

    Quoted message said:

    Mr. Bush, Have I Got An Exit Strategy For You
    by Gus R. Stelzer


    I have a simple one - bring back Saddam.

    I think he could whip that country back into shape in less than a
    month and it would be more stable AND US/Israel friendly than the Iran
    inspired islamic republic that will take hold once the US gets out of
    the way.

    --
    Is this thing on?

  5. "Joe Humble" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Vito said:

    "Hank" <"impeach"@bu$h.gov> wrote

    Quoted message said:

    Mr. Bush, Have I Got An Exit Strategy For You
    by Gus R. Stelzer


    I have a simple one - bring back Saddam.

    I think he could whip that country back into shape in less than a
    month and it would be more stable AND US/Israel friendly than the Iran
    inspired islamic republic that will take hold once the US gets out of
    the way.

    I predict that the IDF will destroy Iran's infrastructure in the near
    future - they can't allow Iran to develop nukes.

  6. On Thu, 08 Dec 2005 06:53:53 GMT, Joe Humble <[email hidden]>
    wrote in misc.fitness.weights:

    Quoted message said:
    Vito said:

    "Hank" <"impeach"@bu$h.gov> wrote

    Quoted message said:

    Mr. Bush, Have I Got An Exit Strategy For You
    by Gus R. Stelzer


    I have a simple one - bring back Saddam.

    I think he could whip that country back into shape in less than a
    month and it would be more stable AND US/Israel friendly than the Iran
    inspired islamic republic that will take hold once the US gets out of
    the way.

    No way. The Shiites and the Kurds have far too much power now. He'd
    be dead within 24 hours.

  7. On Thu, 08 Dec 2005 12:02:05 GMT, "David" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    I predict that the IDF will destroy Iran's infrastructure in the near
    future - they can't allow Iran to develop nukes.

    You're a moron. They have rights, and until they do something wrong,
    they should be left alone. THEN and only then we can nuke them to
    ashes.

    / ~ \
    |\__/
    | |
    | . |
    | `.` |
    __| `` | `.` |/~~\
    / | | | `` |/~~\
    | | | | | `` | /
    \ ` . . | |
    \ . . ` /
    \ . . /
    \ . /
    | . |
    | |
    | |

  8. "Fish!~ of Arcdia" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Thu, 08 Dec 2005 12:02:05 GMT, "David" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    I predict that the IDF will destroy Iran's infrastructure in the near
    future - they can't allow Iran to develop nukes.

    You're a moron. They have rights, and until they do something wrong,
    they should be left alone. THEN and only then we can nuke them to
    ashes.

    / ~ \
    |\__/
    | |
    | . |
    | `.` |
    __| `` | `.` |/~~\
    / | | | `` |/~~\
    | | | | | `` | /
    \ ` . . | |
    \ . . ` /
    \ . . /
    \ . /
    | . |
    | |
    | |

    Don;t be a putz, Fish. They already did something wrong - the Iranian honcho
    vowed the destruction of Israel just 2 weeks ago. You ought to read other
    than comics.

  9. On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 22:40:36 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:


    "Fish!~ of Arcdia" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Thu, 08 Dec 2005 12:02:05 GMT, "David" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    I predict that the IDF will destroy Iran's infrastructure in the near
    future - they can't allow Iran to develop nukes.

    You're a moron. They have rights, and until they do something wrong,
    they should be left alone. THEN and only then we can nuke them to
    ashes.

    / ~ \
    |\__/
    | |
    | . |
    | `.` |
    __| `` | `.` |/~~\
    / | | | `` |/~~\
    | | | | | `` | /
    \ ` . . | |
    \ . . ` /
    \ . . /
    \ . /
    | . |
    | |
    | |

    Don;t be a putz, Fish. They already did something wrong - the Iranian honcho
    vowed the destruction of Israel just 2 weeks ago. You ought to read other
    than comics.

    Look at the IP address David, you're replying to Davidson.

    NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.195.133.223 = TBR = Bill Davidson

  10. "JRH" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 22:40:36 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:


    "Fish!~ of Arcdia" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Thu, 08 Dec 2005 12:02:05 GMT, "David" <[email hidden]>
    wrote:

    >I predict that the IDF will destroy Iran's infrastructure in the near
    >future - they can't allow Iran to develop nukes.

    You're a moron. They have rights, and until they do something wrong,
    they should be left alone. THEN and only then we can nuke them to
    ashes.

    / ~ \
    |\__/
    | |
    | . |
    | `.` |
    __| `` | `.` |/~~\
    / | | | `` |/~~\
    | | | | | `` | /
    \ ` . . | |
    \ . . ` /
    \ . . /
    \ . /
    | . |
    | |
    | |

    Don;t be a putz, Fish. They already did something wrong - the Iranian
    honcho
    vowed the destruction of Israel just 2 weeks ago. You ought to read other
    than comics.

    Look at the IP address David, you're replying to Davidson.

    NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.195.133.223 = TBR = Bill Davidson

    Hello John - I figured as much (the 'finger' was a dead giveaway )- but
    his comment was valid so I elected to reply.

  11. On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 22:56:00 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:


    "JRH" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 22:40:36 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:


    "Fish!~ of Arcdia" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    > On Thu, 08 Dec 2005 12:02:05 GMT, "David" <[email hidden]>
    > wrote:
    >
    >>I predict that the IDF will destroy Iran's infrastructure in the near
    >>future - they can't allow Iran to develop nukes.
    >
    > You're a moron. They have rights, and until they do something wrong,
    > they should be left alone. THEN and only then we can nuke them to
    > ashes.
    >
    > / ~ \
    > |\__/
    > | |
    > | . |
    > | `.` |
    > __| `` | `.` |/~~\
    > / | | | `` |/~~\
    > | | | | | `` | /
    > \ ` . . | |
    > \ . . ` /
    > \ . . /
    > \ . /
    > | . |
    > | |
    > | |

    Don;t be a putz, Fish. They already did something wrong - the Iranian
    honcho
    vowed the destruction of Israel just 2 weeks ago. You ought to read other
    than comics.

    Look at the IP address David, you're replying to Davidson.

    NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.195.133.223 = TBR = Bill Davidson

    Hello John - I figured as much (the 'finger' was a dead giveaway )- but
    his comment was valid so I elected to reply.

    That's what he relies upon, the sick [censored].

    Not to worry mate, it's early days in the campaign! ;o)

  12. "JRH" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 22:56:00 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:


    "JRH" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 22:40:36 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>
    wrote:

    >
    >"Fish!~ of Arcdia" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    >news:[email hidden]...
    >> On Thu, 08 Dec 2005 12:02:05 GMT, "David" <[email hidden]>
    >> wrote:
    >>
    >>>I predict that the IDF will destroy Iran's infrastructure in the near
    >>>future - they can't allow Iran to develop nukes.
    >>
    >> You're a moron. They have rights, and until they do something wrong,
    >> they should be left alone. THEN and only then we can nuke them to
    >> ashes.
    >>
    >> / ~ \
    >> |\__/
    >> | |
    >> | . |
    >> | `.` |
    >> __| `` | `.` |/~~\
    >> / | | | `` |/~~\
    >> | | | | | `` | /
    >> \ ` . . | |
    >> \ . . ` /
    >> \ . . /
    >> \ . /
    >> | . |
    >> | |
    >> | |
    >
    >
    >Don;t be a putz, Fish. They already did something wrong - the Iranian
    >honcho
    >vowed the destruction of Israel just 2 weeks ago. You ought to read
    >other
    >than comics.
    >

    Look at the IP address David, you're replying to Davidson.

    NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.195.133.223 = TBR = Bill Davidson

    Hello John - I figured as much (the 'finger' was a dead giveaway )- but
    his comment was valid so I elected to reply.

    That's what he relies upon, the sick [censored].

    Yes, but if no one responded to sick [censored], there would be precious few
    posts, right?

    Quoted message said:


    Not to worry mate, it's early days in the campaign! ;o)

  13. On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 22:40:36 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Don;t be a putz, Fish. They already did something wrong - the Iranian honcho
    vowed the destruction of Israel just 2 weeks ago. You ought to read other
    than comics.

    So what? We threaten countrys all the time, not only verbally but
    physically.

    / ~ \
    |\__/
    | |
    | . |
    | `.` |
    __| `` | `.` |/~~\
    / | | | `` |/~~\
    | | | | | `` | /
    \ ` . . | |
    \ . . ` /
    \ . . /
    \ . /
    | . |
    | |
    | |

  14. JRH said:

    the sick [censored].

    You got "the drip" Chuckiepoo?

    / ~ \
    |\__/
    | |
    | . |
    | `.` |
    __| `` | `.` |/~~\
    / | | | `` |/~~\
    | | | | | `` | /
    \ ` . . | |
    \ . . ` /
    \ . . /
    \ . /
    | . |
    | |
    | |

  15. JRH said:

    Not to worry mate, it's early days in the campaign! ;o)

    Indeed it is, and I have plenty of time to sort you punks.

    / ~ \
    |\__/
    | |
    | . |
    | `.` |
    __| `` | `.` |/~~\
    / | | | `` |/~~\
    | | | | | `` | /
    \ ` . . | |
    \ . . ` /
    \ . . /
    \ . /
    | . |
    | |
    | |

  16. "Fish!~ of Arcdia" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 22:40:36 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Don;t be a putz, Fish. They already did something wrong - the Iranian
    honcho
    vowed the destruction of Israel just 2 weeks ago. You ought to read other
    than comics.

    So what? We threaten countrys all the time, not only verbally but
    physically.

    So what, Schmuck? This isn't about the USA - the Israelis bombed the Iraq
    reactor in 1981 without any help. It is Israel that is threatened by Iran

    Quoted message said:

    / ~ \
    |\__/
    | |
    | . |
    | `.` |
    __| `` | `.` |/~~\
    / | | | `` |/~~\
    | | | | | `` | /
    \ ` . . | |
    \ . . ` /
    \ . . /
    \ . /
    | . |
    | |
    | |

  17. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Hank 'impeach'@bu$h.gov said:

    http://www.commondreams.org/views0/1205-30.htm

    You mean common nuts? No thanks Hanky-poo.

    --
    Will Brink @ http://www.brinkzone.com/

  18. In article <[email hidden]>,

    John Hanson said:

    On Thu, 08 Dec 2005 06:53:53 GMT, Joe Humble <[email hidden]>
    wrote in misc.fitness.weights:

    Quoted message said:
    Vito said:

    "Hank" <"impeach"@bu$h.gov> wrote
    > Mr. Bush, Have I Got An Exit Strategy For You
    > by Gus R. Stelzer
    >
    I have a simple one - bring back Saddam.

    I think he could whip that country back into shape in less than a
    month and it would be more stable AND US/Israel friendly than the Iran
    inspired islamic republic that will take hold once the US gets out of
    the way.

    No way. The Shiites and the Kurds have far too much power now. He'd
    be dead within 24 hours.

    Is that a bad thing?!

    --
    Will Brink @ http://www.brinkzone.com/

  19. Hank said:

    =>There is hope <=

    Yes, there certainly is. The Bush Administration's steadfast and
    courageous stand against terrorism and in favor of democracy and human
    rights in the middle east is bearing fruit, as even the leftwing
    Washington Post is being forced to admit, such as in this well
    researched and well written article in today's edition:

    A key quote from the article:

    "It is like night and day from 10 months ago in terms of level of
    participation and
    political awareness," said a Canadian election specialist with the
    National
    Democratic Institute for International Affairs, a group affiliated with
    the U.S.
    Democratic Party that is working to ease Iraq's transition to
    democracy.

    See:
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/07/AR2005120702511.html

    Or: http://tinyurl.com/8e7fy

    In Iraq, Signs of Political Evolution
    Parties That Shunned January Vote Are Now Embracing the Process

    By Jonathan Finer
    Washington Post Foreign Service
    Thursday, December 8, 2005; Page A18

    BAGHDAD, Dec. 7 -- Tucked into a bunker-like former headquarters of
    Saddam
    Hussein's Baath Party, a type of war room unfamiliar in this country
    buzzed with
    life Wednesday. Halfway through a 14-hour shift, campaign workers from
    the Iraqi
    Islamic Party, a Sunni Arab group that boycotted the country's previous
    elections
    in January, munched rice and kebabs, their faces lit by computer
    screens.

    Across town, hundreds of black-clad followers of the radical Shiite
    cleric Moqtada
    Sadr -- who decried balloting 10 months ago as something imposed under
    American
    occupation -- beat their backs with chains and stomped across a large
    poster of
    former interim prime minister Ayad Allawi. Sadr's political wing has
    joined forces
    with the alliance of Shiite religious parties that leads Iraq's current
    government
    and opposes Allawi's secular movement.

    As Iraqis nationwide prepare to go to the polls for the third time
    this year on
    Dec. 15 -- this time for a new parliament -- candidates and political
    parties of
    all stripes are embracing politics, Iraqi style, as never before and
    showing
    increasing sophistication about the electoral process, according to
    campaign
    specialists, party officials and candidates here.

    "It is like night and day from 10 months ago in terms of level of
    participation and
    political awareness," said a Canadian election specialist with the
    National
    Democratic Institute for International Affairs, a group affiliated with
    the U.S.
    Democratic Party that is working to ease Iraq's transition to
    democracy. The
    institute, which has provided free campaign training to more than 100
    Iraqi parties
    and describes its programs as nonpartisan, granted a reporter access to
    its
    employees and training sessions on the condition that no one on its
    staff be named.

    Evidence of political evolution is plastered all over Baghdad's
    normally drab
    concrete blast walls and hung on lampposts at nearly every major
    intersection:
    large, colorful, graphically appealing posters conveying a wide variety
    of punchy
    messages.

    Television and radio airwaves are replete with slick advertisements
    costing
    anywhere from $1,250 per minute on al-Sumariya, a Lebanon-based
    satellite station
    focused on Iraq, to $5,000 per minute on al-Arabiya, a network based in
    the United
    Arab Emirates that is popular across the Arab world.

    In one 30-second spot, a smartly dressed and smiling Allawi --
    normally known for
    his brusque demeanor -- is shown seated on a stool in a dimly lit
    studio. "My faith
    is in Iraq," he tells the camera, to underscore his secularism.

    Even the arrival of American-style negative campaigning is evidence of
    a growing
    political sophistication, the election trainers said. In recent days
    posters have
    started to appear in Sadr City, the vast Shiite slum in north Baghdad,
    bearing the
    slogan "vote for the Baathist slate," along with a composite photograph
    of a face
    -- half Allawi's and half Hussein's. Allawi was a member of Hussein's
    Baath Party
    until the mid-1970s, when he joined Iraq's opposition.

    In January, most candidates outside the dominant few parties largely
    eschewed
    campaigning, fearing they could be kidnapped or assassinated. Now, even
    long shots
    are getting into the act. One day this week, National Democratic
    Institute
    instructors explained get-out-the-vote techniques to a dozen members of
    the Free
    Iraq Gathering, a new coalition that "probably won't get many more
    votes than you
    see in that room," according to an institute employee.

    In another room, a Canadian taught workers from the Iraqi National
    Congress, the
    party led by Deputy Prime Minister Ahmed Chalabi, how to monitor
    polling stations
    on election day to prevent cheating and ensure their supporters are
    able to vote.

    "You are the eyes of the party," he said, warning them to look out for
    husbands
    trying to cast ballots for their wives or tribal leaders seeking to
    vote for their
    members. "Your party may have the best solutions for Iraq, but it
    doesn't mean a
    thing unless people come and put a ballot in the box. You have to
    think, I have
    seen Mustafa and Mazen vote, but if someone is missing, maybe you call
    them up and
    offer them a ride to the polls."

    As in January, the specter of election-related violence still hangs
    over Iraq.
    Insurgents have distributed leaflets throughout Anbar province, the
    center of the
    Sunni-led insurgency, threatening to kill anyone who attempts to vote.
    An Iraqi
    Islamic Party candidate was gunned down with two party workers on a
    highway west of
    Baghdad late last month. Allawi escaped unscathed from an attack by
    armed
    demonstrators in Najaf during a visit there Sunday, and two days later,
    a
    rocket-propelled grenade struck his party's Najaf office.

    In several cities in the Kurdish-populated north on Tuesday,
    demonstrators believed
    to be loyal to the Kurdistan Democratic Party burned down several local
    headquarters of a rival party, the Kurdistan Islamic Union, whose
    members recently
    withdrew from a KDP-led election coalition. Four party workers were
    reportedly
    killed in the incidents.

    Because of this, several candidates and party workers said, they
    cannot apply much
    of the advice they get from foreign election workers. At one recent
    session,
    candidates were encouraged to knock on doors or approach people in
    restaurants or
    cafes to talk about issues. They were told to write letters and send
    them to
    everyone they know, outlining their platforms.

    "You could get killed . . . and we don't have mail there," said Khalid
    Madhia, a
    Free Iraqi Gathering candidate from Fallujah. "But it is much easier
    this time.
    Before, we were running while we were hiding. We don't have to hide
    anymore."

    Instead of retail politics, candidates rely largely on less direct
    means of
    contacting voters: Most major parties now have interactive Internet
    sites that
    provide information about platforms. Several parties employ cell phone
    text-messaging technology that allows them to send messages to hundreds
    of
    potential supporters at once. Funding comes from dues and donations
    paid by
    members.

    Religious leaders are also playing a prominent role in the campaign
    through
    networks of affiliated mosques, where imams divide their sermons into a
    religious
    discussion and a political discourse that often touches on the coming
    vote.

    At the Iraqi Islamic Party headquarters, hundreds of cardboard boxes
    full of
    posters waited to be taken by truck to regional outposts in 14 of
    Iraq's 18
    provinces. In another room, video editors scrutinized the latest
    version of the
    party's television ad asking voters to help "end the U.S. occupation."
    The spot
    runs continuously on an in-house satellite station.

    The party had originally decided to compete in last January's
    elections despite a
    broad Sunni Arab boycott, but it eventually withdrew. Sunni Arabs, who
    account for
    an estimated 20 percent of Iraq's population, held most top positions
    in the
    Hussein government but have seen their influence erode significantly
    since his
    ouster.

    "Everyone here is excited. The mood and busyness are so much better
    than before
    when we just waited to see what would happen," said B.B. Abdul Qadir,
    an Iraqi
    Islamic Party official who said his party's goal was to win 60 seats in
    the
    275-seat parliament. "Now we can't wait for the voting to start."

    Correspondent Ellen Knickmeyer and special correspondents Naseer Nouri
    and Dlovan
    Brwari contributed to this report.

  20. Larry xlax Lovisone said:

    It's all about the 2008 strategy... how???
    Democrats are pushing for Bush to bring home the troops

    Not Hillary. She supports bu$h's 200 million dollar
    per day al Qaeda training and recruitment program
    in Iraq.

    -

    Here's what happens to steel framed buildings exposed
    to raging infernos for hours on end.

    http://davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr69c.html

    On 9-11-01, WTC7, a 47 story steel framed building, which
    had only small, random fires, dropped in perfect symmetry
    at near free fall speed as in a perfectly executed controlled
    demolition.

    http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/wtc/videos.html
    http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html
    http://wtc7.net/articles/FEMA/WTC_ch5.htm

    Ever wonder who benefits from the 150 MILLION
    U.S. taxpayer dollars spent each DAY in Iraq?
    http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0223-08.htm
    http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?list=type&type=21

    "They are waging a campaign of murder and destruction. And
    there is no limit to the innocent lives they are willing to
    take... men with blind hatred and armed with lethal weapons
    who are capable of any atrocity... they respect no laws of
    warfare or morality."
    -bu$h describing his own illegal invasion of Iraq.
    http://www.robert-fisk.com/iraqwarvictims_mar2003.htm

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.