rec.sport.unicycling · Public discussion

140 mm vs. 150 mm cranks

Started by boo radley · · Last activity · 12 posts · 269 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
rec.sport.unicycling
Published
7 December 2005
Last activity
10 December 2005
Original author
boo radley
Posts
12
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
269
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–12 of 12
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. i have a radial 360 with 150 mm cranks but i was thinking about putting
    shorter ones on to make it faster and possibly reduce some of the
    wobble as i ride. i mostly ride through neighborhoods(which can
    require quick stops) and some flat trails by my house, so 125's -may-
    be too short. i'm thinking about going with '140's'
    (http://www.unicycle.com/shopping/shopexd.asp?id=617) but i was
    wondering if it would even be worth the effort/money to make the
    switch. is there a noticeable difference between 140's and 150's on a
    36"?

    --
    boo radley

    "This is your work! You'd better take care of me, Lord...because if you
    don't you're gonna have me on your hands." -Raoul Duke
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    boo radley's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/10484
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/45235

  2. I put 125s on my 360 and rode it for about a week and went back to the
    150s and ordered 140s from UDC last week and are being delivered by the
    little brown truck today so I will install and go for a ride tonight
    and let you know

    --
    Daytripper63
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Daytripper63's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/10789
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/45235

  3. Never tried 140s, but it's probably worth a go. Might not make a massive
    difference, but hey.

    As for 125s being too short - yes, to start with you would have less
    control, but after a while (considerably more than a week, I'm afraid)
    your legs and balance will develop to make up for it. The sad truth is
    that as far as cokers go there is no substitute for the complex
    technique of 'riding lots' to get more speed/control.

    John

    --
    johnhimsworth

    Never argue with an idiot; they drag you down to their level and then
    beat you with experience.
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    johnhimsworth's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/1788
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/45235

  4. There's very little that isn't rideable on a coker with 125 cranks,
    other than steep technical muni and a small number of very steep roads.
    Like John says they take some getting used to though.

    I wouldn't bother with 140s unless you've tried 125s already for a
    decent length of time (I reckon about 300-400 miles is enough to get a
    good idea) and really know you're never going to get used to them. Lots
    of people are put off short cranks because they only give them a short
    time and don't learn to ride with them.

    Same goes for 110 cranks, although you really need to be riding
    regularly to get used to 110s, I'm pretty much used to mine now, but
    it's taken quite a long time to really get them sorted. Once you're
    used to 110s, riding a coker with 150s feels like a 20 inch or
    something. 110s are the ultimate low effort long distance cranks.

    Joe

    --
    joemarshall

    my pics http://gallery.unicyclist.com/albuq44
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    joemarshall's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/1545
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/45235

  5. I tried 170mm, 155mm, 110mm, and 89mm.
    My feeling is you will not feel much difference going from 150 to 140.
    Joemarshall is right, if possible try the 125.
    My favorite for distance has been 110mm.
    But now that I do strictly MUni, I used the longest cranks I have
    Torker 170mm; this bent after a bad UPD so now I am on 155. I need to
    order stronger cranks.
    Suggestions?

    --
    leadpan

    "Pain is temporary. Quitting lasts forever" - Lance Armstrong
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    leadpan's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/9751
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/45235

  6. The difference between 150 and 140 is no more than fine tuning for
    personal preference. If 140s were standard, you would think of 150s as
    slightly longer - see what I mean?

    The difference between 150 and 125 is significant. You would be able
    to ride with either length. 125s would give more speed (noticeably
    more) but konger stopping distances, and less control at low speed.

    As experience grows, the effect of changes in cranks becomes less
    important. The way to ride a Coker is lots.

    (Saying that, mine now languishes, but I did put int he miles for a
    long time to develop confidence and control on it.)

    --
    Mikefule

    "Freedom cannot be won without sacrifice. If you set a high value on
    her, everything else must be be valued at little."
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Mikefule's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/879
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/45235

  7. IMHO, going from 150s to 125s is dramatic, and going from 150s to 140s
    is significant. You will notice slighly more speed and slightly less
    control. It may be enough of a difference to plunk down the $$.

    --
    mscalisi
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    mscalisi's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/4961
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/45235

  8. I ride with 140's on my Coker. Like Mikefule says the difference
    between 140's and 150's is mostly fine tuning. The difference is not
    dramatic. I notice slightly smoother pedaling on the flats when using
    the 140's. The difference is noticeable enough that I stick with the
    140's for most of my riding. The level of control with the 140's is
    very close to the 150's. Give the 140's a try.

    I have not even tried 125's on the Coker. I don't really have a desire
    to try cranks shorter than 140. I like having a very comfortable
    margin of control. The 140's let me ride fast enough and handle the
    hills along my regular routes around the Seattle area.

    --
    john_childs

    john_childs (att) hotmail (dott) com
    Gallery: http://gallery.unicyclist.com/john_childs
    'Unicycling Bookmark List' (http://backcountry.unicyclist.com/) ::
    'World Clock' (http://tinyurl.com/a99y3)
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    john_childs's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/449
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/45235

  9. Daytripper63 said:

    I will install and go for a ride tonight and let you know

    excellent.

    i have tried 125's on my 28", they took a little getting used to but
    now they're great for that uni. the 36" is a lot heavier though and i
    don't want to give up too much control because i'd hate to fall off
    right into some traffic. my father rides the 360 as well and he would
    never get used to 125's because he doesn't ride much. i suppose it is
    just fine tuning, but the 140's sound like they may be worth giving a
    try next time i order stuff from UDC.

    --
    boo radley

    "This is your work! You'd better take care of me, Lord...because if you
    don't you're gonna have me on your hands." -Raoul Duke
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    boo radley's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/10484
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/45235

  10. john_childs said:

    Like Mikefule says the difference between 140's and 150's is mostly fine
    tuning. The difference is not dramatic. Give the 140's a try.

    It may have something to do with general skill level as well. For me,
    the shift from 150s to 140s was significant, and it took some getting
    used to, and it took some extra climbing practice before I could make
    it up all the same steep hills on my 140s that I could on my 150s. But
    they are definitely smoother and faster, still very controllable, and I
    have no plans to go back to the 150s.

    That said, I tried some 125s recently, but just for a couple hours in
    fairly challenging conditions. They seem interesting, and I could
    definitely see the potential for great speed if you had some long,
    fairly flat rides. I'm thinking about getting a set, just to see if I
    could get as used to them for climbing as I did to the 140s.

    I'm also weighing just getting the 3-hole DaVinci's with 170/150/130.
    Not ideal, but saves on swapping out cranks frequently, which can't be
    good for the hub tapers.

    --
    tomblackwood

    Tailgate at your own risk...
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    tomblackwood's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/3762
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/45235

  11. O.K. The new Dotek 140mm cranks are on and I got about 18 miles in and
    as a few people said it is just fine tuning, WELL I feel it is GREAT
    tuning! I stopped a few times while riding to get the seat height set
    right for max comfort and max cruising speed. Things I noticed:
    1) I had to climb two overpasses and a long somewhat steep hill on this
    ride (same route I normally ride) and the 140s still gave me enough
    leverage to make the climbs
    2) Smoother pedal/leg action
    3) Still can maintain good control for quik stopping or avoidance of
    obstacles ( my dog )
    4) According to computer my average speed on rides has been between
    8.3mph and 8.6mph but this ride came in at 9.1mph
    It may only be fine tuning but I will take it, and who knows maybe I
    was not ready for my earlier attempt at 127mm cranks but maybe in the
    future I will give them another try. But at the moment the 140s were
    well worth it and they are staying on for a while.

    --
    Daytripper63
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Daytripper63's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/10789
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/45235

  12. yeah i definitely want to try 140's. i've read through some previous
    posts about the doteks though and it sounds like they bend easily.
    anybody know where i might find steel 140's or at least strong aluminum
    ones?

    --
    boo radley

    "Think for yourself. Question authority. To think for yourself you must
    question authority and learn how to put yourself in a state of
    vulnerable, open-mindedness; chaotic, confused, vulnerability to inform
    yourself."
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    boo radley's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/10484
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/45235

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.