Re: Oldtimer asks, Is this place still alive?

John Hanson said:

You, OTOH, live in a two
bit twin. BTW, your landlord is delinquent on his property taxes.

Hanson, it is really, really uncool of you to post people's contact
information on usenet. Really. Stop being a bullying [censored].

Dally

On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 22:59:14 -0500, JMW <[email hidden]> wrote in
misc.fitness.weights:

Quoted message said:

John Hanson said:

"David" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

"JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote:
>
> <sigh> Once again, one of our disgruntled netizens accuses someone of
> spending hours on the Internet just because he doesn't how to use
> available resources. I can pretty much guess where you got that
> information, and it would only take about ten minutes for me, too.

<sigh> Once again, the issue is why anyone would want to do that - to pry
into someone's private life to 'expose' that person. You would have to be a
cycle path to get any satisfaction from it - whether it takes a minute or an
hour or a day is not the point.

I'm more of an ATV trail than a cycle path.

Perhaps he deserves a serious answer to his question, John. But the
best answer comes in the form of another question: Why do some people
crave Usenet anonymity so much?

His mentor once admitted the answer. They do it essentially to be
malicious and dishonest without accountability. They would never say
the nasty things they say, or tell the lies they tell, if they thought
someone they know might connect it with them.

Then why do people expose their identities? To make them nervous.
Suddenly they see that their flimsy Usenet anonymity does not provide
a bulletproof shield.

However, to Curt's credit, he has never tried to conceal his identity
or any personal information. He may be intentionally annoying and
weird, but he doesn't hide. Nevertheless, his comment about you
living with your mother was pretty stupid after the many times you've
posted pics of your own home.

You are right. He even uses his real email address which is something
I don't even do any more.

On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 23:24:35 -0500, Dally <[email hidden]> wrote in
misc.fitness.weights:

Quoted message said:

John Hanson said:

You, OTOH, live in a two
bit twin. BTW, your landlord is delinquent on his property taxes.

Hanson, it is really, really uncool of you to post people's contact
information on usenet. Really. Stop being a bullying [censored].

Okay Wendy Marsden.

On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 14:07:29 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>
wrote in misc.fitness.weights:

Quoted message said:

"JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

John Hanson said:

"David" <[email hidden]>
>
>"JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>
>> <sigh> Once again, one of our disgruntled netizens accuses someone of
>> spending hours on the Internet just because he doesn't how to use
>> available resources. I can pretty much guess where you got that
>> information, and it would only take about ten minutes for me, too.
>
><sigh> Once again, the issue is why anyone would want to do that - to pry
>into someone's private life to 'expose' that person. You would have to be
>a
>cycle path to get any satisfaction from it - whether it takes a minute or
>an
>hour or a day is not the point.

I'm more of an ATV trail than a cycle path.

Perhaps he deserves a serious answer to his question, John. But the
best answer comes in the form of another question: Why do some people
crave Usenet anonymity so much?

His mentor once admitted the answer. They do it essentially to be
malicious and dishonest without accountability. They would never say
the nasty things they say, or tell the lies they tell, if they thought
someone they know might connect it with them.

Then why do people expose their identities? To make them nervous.
Suddenly they see that their flimsy Usenet anonymity does not provide
a bulletproof shield.

However, to Curt's credit, he has never tried to conceal his identity
or any personal information. He may be intentionally annoying and
weird, but he doesn't hide. Nevertheless, his comment about you
living with your mother was pretty stupid after the many times you've
posted pics of your own home.

An interesting rationalization if the facts fit the story. But they don't.
Why did Dally recoil at having her real name and personal details published?
What about all the nasty things she said and the lies? You are full of [censored]
as usual.

I still don't understand why she objected to that.

John Hanson said:

On Sat, 24 Dec 2005 23:24:35 -0500, Dally <[email hidden]> wrote in
misc.fitness.weights:

Quoted message said:

John Hanson said:

You, OTOH, live in a two
bit twin. BTW, your landlord is delinquent on his property taxes.

Hanson, it is really, really uncool of you to post people's contact
information on usenet. Really. Stop being a bullying [censored].

Okay Wendy.

WTF? Get a grip. It's really not too much to ask. Axel is
legitimently mentally ill. I didn't throw a fit about him using both
names because, well, because. It [censored] me off that people kept
full-text quoting him without snipping a name. But WTF is wrong with
YOU? Don't use both names.

Dally

John Hanson said:

On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 14:07:29 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>
wrote in misc.fitness.weights:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

An interesting rationalization if the facts fit the story. But they don't.
Why did Dally recoil at having her real name and personal details published?
What about all the nasty things she said and the lies? You are full of [censored]
as usual.

I still don't understand why she objected to that.

It doesn't matter why I object to that. I object to that.

And, to David, I still have you killfiled so I don't know if you're
using it or not. But a pretty good reason to object is that you have
actually emailed me at my work email and I find that annoying.

Dally

"Dally" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

John Hanson said:

On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 14:07:29 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>
wrote in misc.fitness.weights:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

An interesting rationalization if the facts fit the story. But they
don't. Why did Dally recoil at having her real name and personal details
published? What about all the nasty things she said and the lies? You are
full of [censored] as usual.

I still don't understand why she objected to that.

It doesn't matter why I object to that. I object to that.

And, to David, I still have you killfiled so I don't know if you're using
it or not.

I'm happy to be on your killfile list - stop whining your incessant whining!

But a pretty good reason to object is that you have

Quoted message said:

actually emailed me at my work email and I find that annoying.

Dally

Dally said:

John Hanson said:

On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 14:07:29 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>
wrote in misc.fitness.weights:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

An interesting rationalization if the facts fit the story. But they don't.
Why did Dally recoil at having her real name and personal details published?
What about all the nasty things she said and the lies? You are full of [censored]
as usual.

I still don't understand why she objected to that.

It doesn't matter why I object to that. I object to that.

And, to David, I still have you killfiled so I don't know if you're
using it or not. But a pretty good reason to object is that you have
actually emailed me at my work email and I find that annoying.

Rise above it, Wendy. At least one moron uses my full name all the
time, as though it's some magic incantation that makes him more
powerful. In reality, it just makes him look childish. You would do
well to ignore it.

"JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Dally said:

John Hanson said:

On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 14:07:29 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>
wrote in misc.fitness.weights:

Quoted message said:

>An interesting rationalization if the facts fit the story. But they
>don't.
>Why did Dally recoil at having her real name and personal details
>published?
>What about all the nasty things she said and the lies? You are full of
>[censored]
>as usual.
>

I still don't understand why she objected to that.

It doesn't matter why I object to that. I object to that.

And, to David, I still have you killfiled so I don't know if you're
using it or not. But a pretty good reason to object is that you have
actually emailed me at my work email and I find that annoying.

Rise above it, Wendy. At least one moron uses my full name all the
time, as though it's some magic incantation that makes him more
powerful. In reality, it just makes him look childish. You would do
well to ignore it.

Funny that. One moron used my full name just recently as well. Just made him
look like a schmuck.

JMW said:

Dally said:

John Hanson said:

"David" <[email hidden]> wrote
>An interesting rationalization if the facts fit the story. But they don't.
>Why did Dally recoil at having her real name and personal details published?
>What about all the nasty things she said and the lies? You are full of [censored]
>as usual.
>
I still don't understand why she objected to that.

It doesn't matter why I object to that. I object to that.

And, to David, I still have you killfiled so I don't know if you're
using it or not. But a pretty good reason to object is that you have
actually emailed me at my work email and I find that annoying.

Rise above it, Wendy. At least one moron uses my full name all the
time, as though it's some magic incantation that makes him more
powerful. In reality, it just makes him look childish.

I don't know. He DID write all the music for the Star Wars movies, and
most of the Spielberg/Lucas stuff, and conducted the Boston Pops.
Pretty powerful without you.

David

David said:

"JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Dally said:

John Hanson wrote:

> On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 14:07:29 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>
> wrote in misc.fitness.weights:

>>An interesting rationalization if the facts fit the story. But they
>>don't.
>>Why did Dally recoil at having her real name and personal details
>>published?
>>What about all the nasty things she said and the lies? You are full of
>>[censored]
>>as usual.
>>
>
> I still don't understand why she objected to that.

It doesn't matter why I object to that. I object to that.

And, to David, I still have you killfiled so I don't know if you're
using it or not. But a pretty good reason to object is that you have
actually emailed me at my work email and I find that annoying.

Rise above it, Wendy. At least one moron uses my full name all the
time, as though it's some magic incantation that makes him more
powerful. In reality, it just makes him look childish. You would do
well to ignore it.

Funny that. One moron used my full name just recently as well. Just made him
look like a schmuck.

I doubt he looked as much like a schmuck as the fellow who started
making angry threats of real-world harassment just because someone
mentioned his full name. 🙂

David Cohen said:

JMW said:

Dally said:

John Hanson wrote:
> "David" <[email hidden]> wrote
>>An interesting rationalization if the facts fit the story. But they don't.
>>Why did Dally recoil at having her real name and personal details published?
>>What about all the nasty things she said and the lies? You are full of [censored]
>>as usual.
>>
> I still don't understand why she objected to that.

It doesn't matter why I object to that. I object to that.

And, to David, I still have you killfiled so I don't know if you're
using it or not. But a pretty good reason to object is that you have
actually emailed me at my work email and I find that annoying.

Rise above it, Wendy. At least one moron uses my full name all the
time, as though it's some magic incantation that makes him more
powerful. In reality, it just makes him look childish.

I don't know. He DID write all the music for the Star Wars movies, and
most of the Spielberg/Lucas stuff, and conducted the Boston Pops.
Pretty powerful without you.

That fellow had it before me.

"JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

David said:

"JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Dally <[email hidden]> wrote:

>John Hanson wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 14:07:29 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>
>> wrote in misc.fitness.weights:
>
>>>An interesting rationalization if the facts fit the story. But they
>>>don't.
>>>Why did Dally recoil at having her real name and personal details
>>>published?
>>>What about all the nasty things she said and the lies? You are full of
>>>[censored]
>>>as usual.
>>>
>>
>> I still don't understand why she objected to that.
>
>It doesn't matter why I object to that. I object to that.
>
>And, to David, I still have you killfiled so I don't know if you're
>using it or not. But a pretty good reason to object is that you have
>actually emailed me at my work email and I find that annoying.

Rise above it, Wendy. At least one moron uses my full name all the
time, as though it's some magic incantation that makes him more
powerful. In reality, it just makes him look childish. You would do
well to ignore it.

Funny that. One moron used my full name just recently as well. Just made
him
look like a schmuck.

I doubt he looked as much like a schmuck as the fellow who started
making angry threats of real-world harassment just because someone
mentioned his full name. 🙂

But, using my full name *was* real world harassment.

"JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

David said:

"JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Dally <[email hidden]> wrote:

>John Hanson wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 14:07:29 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>
>> wrote in misc.fitness.weights:
>
>>>An interesting rationalization if the facts fit the story. But they
>>>don't.
>>>Why did Dally recoil at having her real name and personal details
>>>published?
>>>What about all the nasty things she said and the lies? You are full of
>>>[censored]
>>>as usual.
>>>
>>
>> I still don't understand why she objected to that.
>
>It doesn't matter why I object to that. I object to that.
>
>And, to David, I still have you killfiled so I don't know if you're
>using it or not. But a pretty good reason to object is that you have
>actually emailed me at my work email and I find that annoying.

Rise above it, Wendy. At least one moron uses my full name all the
time, as though it's some magic incantation that makes him more
powerful. In reality, it just makes him look childish. You would do
well to ignore it.

Funny that. One moron used my full name just recently as well. Just made
him
look like a schmuck.

I doubt he looked as much like a schmuck as the fellow who started
making angry threats of real-world harassment just because someone
mentioned his full name. 🙂

So, it seems that troll enablers aren't killfiled according to the rules?

John Hanson said:

Who uses dial up anymore?

Lots of people use dial-up, oh Internet-access snob. ;o)

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

WHO has too much time on their hands.

That took all of 10 minutes.

Time you'll never get back.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Merry Christmas, Johnny!

Thanks!

You're welcome. And a Happy New Year as well!

--

John Hanson <[email hidden]> wrote:

re what he owns

Quoted message said:

Properties. I'm not delinquent either.

Do Monopoly properties really count?

Quoted message said:

Piece of cake.

I like pie.

--

David said:

the only time I would try to hurt someone in that private way is if he did
the same to me. Even if someone calls my mother a crack [censored] on usenet,
that would not justify my publishing his private info.

Private schmivate, David. I offer personal info on
http://curtjames.com/ as well as any number of my other blogs which
can all be accessed via curtjames.com as well. If that was an attempt
at hurting me then he's mistaken.

--
Curt
http://curtjames.com/

John Hanson said:

I live by the Golden Rule with the Capone Corollary. Do on to others
as you would want them to do onto you. But, if someone breaks your
arm, you break his leg. If he breaks your leg, you break his head.

I'm amazed that you actually spelled corollary correctly. Anyway, it's
unto. Do UNto others as you would have them do UNto you.

They'd appreciate Capone in the inner-city where the philosophy is
often if they hit you once, you hit 'em back twice.

--

J M Won't-look-beyond-the-nose-on-his-face <[email hidden]> wrote:

re

CURTIS WILLIAM JAMES
29 SOUTH PITT STREET
CARLISLE, PA 17013

717-249-7819

Quoted message said:

<sigh> Once again, one of our disgruntled netizens

ahahahAHHAH! Said the King of Disgruntled Netizens! :o)

Quoted message said:

I can pretty much guess where you got that information,
and it would only take about ten minutes for me, too.

Yes? And how long will it take you to ignore a noted (by YOU) troll
/enabler/?

You're a funny guy. I'm a so-called disgruntled netizen, but you're a
crybaby [censored] who's obviously screeeeeaming for attention. There,
there, J M Who's-a-cutie-pootie-baaaaby?

I mean, please, follow your own advice and killfile appropriately.
That would, common sense would indicate, involve ignoring those you've
killfiled. Oh, of course, what was I thinking? You're apparently lean
on the whole common sense. Never mind.

--

JMW said:

However, to Curt's credit, he has never tried to conceal his identity
or any personal information. He may be intentionally annoying and
weird, but he doesn't hide. Nevertheless, his comment about you
living with your mother was pretty stupid after the many times you've
posted pics of your own home.

Dear J M
Why-is-your-head-so-incredibly-and-tightly-lodged-in-your-rectum?,

I ~*asked*~ if he lived with his mommy. My friend said Johnny lived
with his parents. He spews enough immature banter, so it would make
sense that he's younger than I had originally assumed. I've never seen
pics of his /home/. I'm not especially interested in him or you, for
that matter.

Do YOU live with your mommy?

--