"Dave Mayer" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Shimano was boxed into a corner on this. They needed a 10-speed system because Campy had one. They also had to produce a cog spacing that was different enough from Campy's 10-speed so as to not to be compatible. However, they were limited by the 130mm rear stay spacing in road bikes. Only one way to go... really thin.
Next question: does this mean that Campy 10-speed chains will be too thick for Shimano cogsets?
It's hard to imagine 17 one-hundreths of a millimeter making that much of a difference.
Quoted message said:
"Peter Vesel" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
From the new Dura-ace catalogue at the Bicycling Australia Show
think you have to add 1/2 thediffernce in cog thickness to spacer difference, so it 22/100ths. perhaps enough to make noisey. over ten cogs would that be 9x.22mm? of about a spoke's diameter?
"Robin Hubert" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
"Dave Mayer" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Shimano was boxed into a corner on this. They needed a 10-speed system because Campy had one. They also had to produce a cog spacing that was different enough from Campy's 10-speed so as to not to be compatible. However, they were limited by the 130mm rear stay spacing in road bikes. Only one way to go... really thin.
Next question: does this mean that Campy 10-speed chains will be too
thick
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
for Shimano cogsets?
It's hard to imagine 17 one-hundreths of a millimeter making that much of
a
Quoted message said:
difference.
Quoted message said:
"Peter Vesel" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
From the new Dura-ace catalogue at the Bicycling Australia Show
The chain is listed as 5.88mm to the outside of the plates (9speed was/is 6.57) and the inside is unchanged at 2.32mm. I don't have a campag reference handy.
Peter
"wannagofast" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
think you have to add 1/2 thediffernce in cog thickness to spacer difference, so it 22/100ths. perhaps enough to make noisey. over ten
cogs
Quoted message said:
would that be 9x.22mm? of about a spoke's diameter?
"Robin Hubert" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
"Dave Mayer" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Shimano was boxed into a corner on this. They needed a 10-speed
system
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
because Campy had one. They also had to produce a cog spacing that
was
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
different enough from Campy's 10-speed so as to not to be compatible. However, they were limited by the 130mm rear stay spacing in road
bikes.
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Only one way to go... really thin.
Next question: does this mean that Campy 10-speed chains will be too
thick
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
for Shimano cogsets?
It's hard to imagine 17 one-hundreths of a millimeter making that much
of
Quoted message said:
a
Quoted message said:
difference.
Quoted message said:
"Peter Vesel" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]... > From the new Dura-ace catalogue at the Bicycling Australia Show > > 10 speed cog width 1.6mm 10 speed spacer width 2.35mm > =3.95mm spacing > > comparing to Campag from Sheldon's site 10 speed cog 1.7 mm 10 speed spacer 2.42 mm > =4.12 spacing > > Don't know if this has been posted before, but I know I hadn't seen