General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Rival Slow Cooker

Started by Sheldon · · Last activity · 59 posts · 1,564 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
15 February 2006
Last activity
19 February 2006
Original author
Sheldon
Posts
59
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,564
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–40 of 59
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size

  1. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    I made a pot roast last week in my crock pot. It was set on low, and
    following directions, I let it cook for 8 hours. When 8 hours had
    passed, I found the liquid in the pot to be boiling. A serious boil.
    In light of what you've said about newer crock pots running hotter, is
    this normal? My crock pot is maybe 5 or 6 years old.

    Is 5-6 years new in crock pot lingo? Did they ever work as advertised,
    cook slooooow!

    Hmm, how come all yoose crock pot touters never mentioned this
    overheating thingie in all the many previous crock pot threads??? I'm
    beginning to think I should cancel my order and stay with my tried and
    true old fogey methods. Doesn't anyone have anything good to say in
    defence of this, otherwise I'll take your silence as agreeing with
    crock pots being [censored] pots.

    Sheldon

    I use the WestBend metal pan slow cooker that claims the base can be
    used as a griddle....not very convenient. I tried it once and didn't
    care for it. A frying pan was better. Now on to the subject of crock
    pots cooking too hot. My WestBend doesn't overheat. It's about 10 yrs
    old though. I would call their 800 number and ask them what the
    temperatures are supposed to be. I have another one, round, by WestBend
    that I bought at a yard sale (for 2.00) that I don't know the age of.
    If I put it on the lowest setting, it is too low. But overall, I use
    them a lot and find them very reliable.......Sharon

  2. Gregory Morrow said:
    jillie said:

    Sheldon, I have this model and use it a lot. Oatmeal done in the
    crockpot is great...and a blessing on the mornings there is no time to
    cook.

    I think you'll enjoy it for more things than you had anticipated.
    Crockpots are great!

    The new crockpot liner bags by Reynolds are a real time saver,
    too....makes clean up a breeze.

    I still think they are a silly affectation...my crock pot cleans up
    very easily, almost like magic - and this is true for stuff I've cooked
    for many hours, e.g. spaghetti sauce.

    The crockpot is a GODSEND for making stocks, spaghetti sauce, soups,
    etc. You don't have to constantly fiddle with a flame, you can make a
    large quantity (I have the 6 - quart model) and clean - up is a snap...

    Tonight I'm making chicken/sausage gumbo, this weekend will be cold so
    I'm making some nice warm minestrone...I'll have plenty for myself, to
    give, and for company.

    Needless to say it's real economical too, no need for me to have to buy
    canned stock or soup ever again if I don't want to. For the price of a
    coupla cans of Progresso I can make *quarts* of soup with the
    thing...no more pondering "I wonder what EXACTLY they put in that
    canned stock?". I am running out of freezer space in fact, I am
    seriously considering buying a small freezer in which to store my
    crockpot "bounty"...

    I'm a single person and I love mine, they must be a REAL boon for
    larger households...

    Sounds like I won't be disappointed.

    I checked out those bags, sure looks like a gimmick to me... I can't
    imagine the insert can be difficult to clean, it's a slow cooker after
    all, why should anything burn/stick?

    http://www.reynoldskitchens.com/reynoldskitchens/kitchenconnection/products/slow_cooker/index.asp

    I suppose I'll have to wait a while, as to get the free shipping I had
    to choose the slow boat via China option, they say 2 weeks, but my
    experience with Amazon is most items arrive within 2-3 days regardless
    which shipping option chosen, only those items shipped from secondary
    sources take a bit longer. I'm looking forward to trying this out on
    my Mcanns steel cut oats. I haven't cooked any since the last time on
    the stove top, took about forever, all the while stirring my arm off...
    and I have a well exercised wrist, but nearly two hours...!

    For extra food storage I like a second refrigerator-freezer rather than
    a freezer alone... I have a smaller (18 cu ft) no frills model in the
    basement... uses little energy as it's rarely opened. The extra fridge
    space comes in might handy... also is a good buffer in case one unit
    dies, you still have the other to cram into until the repair or a new
    one is purchased... and I don't see the point in freezing years worth
    of food... I think living in the US more than 6 months worth is
    ridiculous, has nothing to do with saving money, simply means you're
    paranoid you might starve... yeah, like most Americans look like
    they're starving.

    Sheldon

  3. Gregory Morrow said:

    I still think they are a silly affectation...my crock pot cleans up
    very easily, almost like magic - and this is true for stuff I've cooked
    for many hours, e.g. spaghetti sauce.

    Agree, our crockpot has a nice smooth glaze on the liner and cleans up
    easily.

    Quoted message said:


    The crockpot is a GODSEND for making stocks, spaghetti sauce, soups,
    etc. You don't have to constantly fiddle with a flame, you can make a
    large quantity (I have the 6 - quart model) and clean - up is a snap...

    Tonight I'm making chicken/sausage gumbo, this weekend will be cold so
    I'm making some nice warm minestrone...I'll have plenty for myself, to
    give, and for company.

    Needless to say it's real economical too, no need for me to have to buy
    canned stock or soup ever again if I don't want to. For the price of a
    coupla cans of Progresso I can make *quarts* of soup with the
    thing...no more pondering "I wonder what EXACTLY they put in that
    canned stock?". I am running out of freezer space in fact, I am
    seriously considering buying a small freezer in which to store my
    crockpot "bounty"...

    I'm a single person and I love mine, they must be a REAL boon for
    larger households...

  4. Sheldon said:
    Gregory Morrow said:
    Sheldon said:

    I decided I want to cook a week's worth of steel cut/pin oats without
    needing to stir on the stovetop for hours so broke down and ordered a
    slow cooker... anyone want to comment on this Rival model?


    I recently got the exact same model Sheldon, I think you'll like
    it...has worked like a charm for me so far.


    Ah, the voice of reason, from someone who actually owns one. Thanks - Greg.


    Sheldon, as to the crockpot cooking bags, they're no different than
    your standard oven bag. Simply put whatever you're to be slow-cooking
    into the bag that then becomes the pot's liner. No real need unless
    your cooker is a type that may be difficult to clean. However, a great
    use for the liners/oven bags is qwhen you may want to use just the one
    cooker for two entirely different foods at the same time; bag each
    seperately. I learned this through an unprepared for need to take two
    different veggie dishes to a potluck where no heating facility was to
    be, and the oven bags worked perfectly.

    Picky

  5. Sheldon wrote on 15 Feb 2006 in rec.food.cooking

    Quoted message said:

    I decided I want to cook a week's worth of steel cut/pin oats without
    needing to stir on the stovetop for hours so broke down and ordered a
    slow cooker... anyone want to comment on this Rival model? Is it any
    good or did I screw up and make a poor choice? I figured I may as
    well get a large capacity model in case I want to try it for other
    foods.

    "Rival 38651-C 6-Quart Countdown Programmable Smart-Pot Slow Cooker,
    Stainless"

    http://www.rivalproducts.com/eStore/product.aspx?CatalogId=5&CategoryId
    =1186&ProductId=89

    Actually I bought it from Amazon.com, was on sale for $39.99, w/free
    shipping.

    Sheldon

    I have a similar one an 11 quart job I use for soups mostly. While it is
    a nice crock pot, durable and works well. The only con I have is that
    while it has a timer it does not have a delay cooking setting or a means
    of changing heat settings part way thru cooking, which while not
    necessary would be a nice option. For those 6 hour recipes when you're
    gone 8-10 hours. Yes I know about the "keep warm" feature.

    --
    The eyes are the mirrors....
    But the ears...Ah the ears.
    The ears keep the hat up.

  6. "NancyJaye" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    King's Crown wrote:

    Snipped....

    ...................................................... One
    thing to consider with new

    Quoted message said:

    crockpots is they run hotter than the old ones. Cooking often twice as
    fast
    as the older models. Make sure you keep that in mind when you
    experiment.

    Lynen

    I made a pot roast last week in my crock pot. It was set on low, and
    following directions, I let it cook for 8 hours. When 8 hours had
    passed, I found the liquid in the pot to be boiling. A serious boil.
    In light of what you've said about newer crock pots running hotter, is
    this normal? My crock pot is maybe 5 or 6 years old.

    NancyJaye


    Yes, when I say newer I mean in the last 10 years or so. My crockpots are
    from the 70 and early 80's. I too discovered they were hotter, but placing
    a chicken in my new oval crockpot (this was about 5 years ago) after 8 hours
    it was cooked to death and boiling... on low. I found out if I came home at
    lunch loaded up the crockpot it was good by dinner, but then I thought it
    really was more of a nuisance than and time saver having to do that. So, I
    took the new one to the cabin and took my old ones out of the Goodwill box
    and continue to use them. I thought having an oval shaped one would be
    nice. NOT! if it cooks at a higher temp.

    Lynne

  7. "Sheldon" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    NancyJaye said:

    King's Crown wrote:

    Snipped....

    ...................................................... One
    thing to consider with new

    Quoted message said:

    crockpots is they run hotter than the old ones. Cooking often twice as
    fast
    as the older models. Make sure you keep that in mind when you
    experiment.

    Lynen

    I made a pot roast last week in my crock pot. It was set on low, and
    following directions, I let it cook for 8 hours. When 8 hours had
    passed, I found the liquid in the pot to be boiling. A serious boil.
    In light of what you've said about newer crock pots running hotter, is
    this normal? My crock pot is maybe 5 or 6 years old.

    Is 5-6 years new in crock pot lingo? Did they ever work as advertised,
    cook slooooow!

    Hmm, how come all yoose crock pot touters never mentioned this
    overheating thingie in all the many previous crock pot threads??? I'm
    beginning to think I should cancel my order and stay with my tried and
    true old fogey methods. Doesn't anyone have anything good to say in
    defence of this, otherwise I'll take your silence as agreeing with
    crock pots being [censored] pots.

    Sheldon


    I think if you have time to cook something for 4 hours rather than 8 it
    could save you some time. If you're looking for something that will cook
    for 8 hours on low my experience is the new crockpots will cook it to death.

    Lynne

  8. If you're looking for something that will cook

    Quoted message said:

    for 8 hours on low my experience is the new crockpots will cook it to
    death.

    Lynne


    Agreed; just happened to me --
    but, I bought an 'il cheapo.' So what can I say -- you get what you paid
    for? But I did read all these warnings in most of the brands and took a
    chance. I'm glad I still have the smaller one -- 30 years and working ok --
    low is low and high is high.
    Dee Dee

  9. Gregory Morrow said:
    NancyJaye said:

    I made a pot roast last week in my crock pot. It was set on low, and
    following directions, I let it cook for 8 hours. When 8 hours had
    passed, I found the liquid in the pot to be boiling. A serious boil.
    In light of what you've said about newer crock pots running hotter, is
    this normal? My crock pot is maybe 5 or 6 years old.

    That is normal...

    --
    Best
    Greg

    Thanks Greg. I was almost ready to go buy a new one!

    Nancy

  10. King's Crown said:


    Yes, when I say newer I mean in the last 10 years or so. My crockpots are
    from the 70 and early 80's. I too discovered they were hotter, but placing
    a chicken in my new oval crockpot (this was about 5 years ago) after 8 hours
    it was cooked to death and boiling... on low. I found out if I came home at
    lunch loaded up the crockpot it was good by dinner, but then I thought it
    really was more of a nuisance than and time saver having to do that. So, I
    took the new one to the cabin and took my old ones out of the Goodwill box
    and continue to use them. I thought having an oval shaped one would be
    nice. NOT! if it cooks at a higher temp.

    I'll have to wait until I get mine to see how it's constructed... but
    quite possibly wrapping the crock insert exterior in aluminum foil
    might act as an insulator/reflector and help keep the temperature down
    a bit. But hopefully I'll not have any excessive temperature problem.

    Sheldon

  11. "Gregory Morrow" <[email hidden]> hitched up their panties and
    posted news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:


    jillie said:

    Sheldon, I have this model and use it a lot. Oatmeal done in the
    crockpot is great...and a blessing on the mornings there is no time to
    cook.

    I think you'll enjoy it for more things than you had anticipated.
    Crockpots are great!

    The new crockpot liner bags by Reynolds are a real time saver,
    too....makes clean up a breeze.

    I still think they are a silly affectation...my crock pot cleans up
    very easily, almost like magic - and this is true for stuff I've cooked
    for many hours, e.g. spaghetti sauce.

    The crockpot is a GODSEND for making stocks, spaghetti sauce, soups,
    etc. You don't have to constantly fiddle with a flame, you can make a
    large quantity (I have the 6 - quart model) and clean - up is a snap...

    Tonight I'm making chicken/sausage gumbo, this weekend will be cold so
    I'm making some nice warm minestrone...I'll have plenty for myself, to
    give, and for company.

    Needless to say it's real economical too, no need for me to have to buy
    canned stock or soup ever again if I don't want to. For the price of a
    coupla cans of Progresso I can make *quarts* of soup with the
    thing...no more pondering "I wonder what EXACTLY they put in that
    canned stock?". I am running out of freezer space in fact, I am
    seriously considering buying a small freezer in which to store my
    crockpot "bounty"...

    I'm a single person and I love mine, they must be a REAL boon for
    larger households...

    I like my slow cooker. Actually we have 2 of them. A real small model
    which I seldom use except as a warmer for gravys and such. I don't use the
    large one much. I've never had good luck in cooking in it but it's great
    for caramelized onions, a long cooked sauce etc. Mine is a Rival but must
    be long discontinued. We have had it almost 15 years. Sheldon's model
    looks great. We also have a slow cooker (newer but won at a charity
    auction... brand unknown) I can almost comfortably get a chicken in it. It
    works great. All of them clean up beautifully and quickly.

    Michael

    --
    “It requires a certain kind of mind to see beauty in a hamburger bun.”
    _Ray Kroc, creator of the McDonald's franchise

  12. biig said:


    I use the WestBend metal pan slow cooker that claims the base can be
    used as a griddle....not very convenient. I tried it once and didn't
    care for it. A frying pan was better. Now on to the subject of crock
    pots cooking too hot. My WestBend doesn't overheat. It's about 10 yrs
    old though. But overall, I use
    them a lot and find them very reliable.......Sharon

    Oh, oh, oh, I have the rectangle WestBend slower cooker, too and just
    love it!!! Never have used the base as they advertised. The pan has
    however been used in the oven a few zillion times. I think Sheldon
    will be immensely pleased with his once he tries it out. Meats are
    soooo tender.

  13. Sheldon said:
    King's Crown said:


    Yes, when I say newer I mean in the last 10 years or so. My crockpots are
    from the 70 and early 80's. I too discovered they were hotter, but placing
    a chicken in my new oval crockpot (this was about 5 years ago) after 8 hours
    it was cooked to death and boiling... on low. I found out if I came home at
    lunch loaded up the crockpot it was good by dinner, but then I thought it
    really was more of a nuisance than and time saver having to do that. So, I
    took the new one to the cabin and took my old ones out of the Goodwill box
    and continue to use them. I thought having an oval shaped one would be
    nice. NOT! if it cooks at a higher temp.

    I'll have to wait until I get mine to see how it's constructed... but
    quite possibly wrapping the crock insert exterior in aluminum foil
    might act as an insulator/reflector and help keep the temperature down
    a bit. But hopefully I'll not have any excessive temperature problem.

    I've also "cracked" the lid a bit in order to vent some of the steam.
    This was when I was making spaghetti sauce and wanted it to thicken
    down somewhat...this is not recommended by the manufacturer but it
    worked okay for an hour or so. I wouldn' t leave the lid ajar
    unattended for an extended period of time, it would probably be okay
    but that's just me.

    --
    Best
    Greg

  14. Sheldon said:

    I decided I want to cook a week's worth of steel cut/pin oats without
    needing to stir on the stovetop for hours so broke down and ordered a
    slow cooker... anyone want to comment on this Rival model? Is it any
    good or did I screw up and make a poor choice? I figured I may as
    well get a large capacity model in case I want to try it for other
    foods.

    "Rival 38651-C 6-Quart Countdown Programmable Smart-Pot Slow Cooker,
    Stainless"

    http://www.rivalproducts.com/eStore/product.aspx?CatalogId=5&CategoryId=1186&ProductId=89

    Actually I bought it from Amazon.com, was on sale for $39.99, w/free
    shipping.


    -------

    Okie dokie... my slow cooker arrived. I ordered it at 10:20AM of 2/15,
    it arrived at 2PM today, 2/17. That was fast, too fast for something
    called a slow cooker! hehe

    It looks nice. I have no idea how it cooks. I didn't plug it in yet,
    I only washed the crock and lid. I read through the instructions,
    seems simple enough. I read a few of the recipes they included in the
    tiny instruction manual.... why do they make such small instruction
    manuals these days, this is like 1/4 the size of a sheet of paper...
    the print is ridiculously small. After reading the few recipes I
    noticed how this is not my cooking style, don't really think I could
    adapt either, nor would I want to.
    I honestly don't fathom this business about browning a roast in a
    separate pot before placing the roast into the crock... seems utterly
    dago dumb, because now I'd have to clean a pot I didn't cook in. Duh
    This thing removes all user input. I think it's misnamed... this is
    not cooking, not by any stretch of the imagination... should be called
    a "Slow Food Processor"... "Slow" as in Low IQ.

    But I will try it for processing my steel cut oats.

    Sheldon

  15. Sheldon said:

    I decided I want to cook a week's worth of steel cut/pin oats without
    needing to stir on the stovetop for hours so broke down and ordered a
    slow cooker... anyone want to comment on this Rival model? Is it any
    good or did I screw up and make a poor choice? I figured I may as
    well get a large capacity model in case I want to try it for other
    foods.

    "Rival 38651-C 6-Quart Countdown Programmable Smart-Pot Slow Cooker,
    Stainless"

    http://www.rivalproducts.com/eStore/product.aspx?CatalogId=5&CategoryId=1186&ProductId=89

    Actually I bought it from Amazon.com, was on sale for $39.99, w/free
    shipping.

    Found these recipes to try:
    http://www.cdkitchen.com/search/search.php?c=&order=1&site=crockerykitchen&q=steel+cut+oats&t=0

    http://tinyurl.com/agnlp

    Sheldon

  16. Sheldon said:

    [snip] I read a few of the recipes they included in the
    tiny instruction manual.... .... After reading the few recipes I
    noticed how this is not my cooking style, don't really think I could
    adapt either, nor would I want to.
    I honestly don't fathom this business about browning a roast in a
    separate pot before placing the roast into the crock... seems utterly
    dago dumb, because now I'd have to clean a pot I didn't cook in. Duh
    This thing removes all user input. I think it's misnamed... this is
    not cooking, not by any stretch of the imagination... should be called
    a "Slow Food Processor"... "Slow" as in Low IQ.

    Just curious, do the recipes they print call for canned cream of this
    and that soup? Seems like 90% of those that show up here do. I've
    thought maybe you need all those preservatives to stand up to the long
    cooking times....;-) -aem

  17. aem said:
    Sheldon said:

    [snip] I read a few of the recipes they included in the
    tiny instruction manual.... .... After reading the few recipes I
    noticed how this is not my cooking style, don't really think I could
    adapt either, nor would I want to.
    I honestly don't fathom this business about browning a roast in a
    separate pot before placing the roast into the crock... seems utterly
    dago dumb, because now I'd have to clean a pot I didn't cook in. Duh
    This thing removes all user input. I think it's misnamed... this is
    not cooking, not by any stretch of the imagination... should be called
    a "Slow Food Processor"... "Slow" as in Low IQ.

    Just curious, do the recipes they print call for canned cream of this
    and that soup? Seems like 90% of those that show up here do. I've
    thought maybe you need all those preservatives to stand up to the long
    cooking times....;-)

    The accompanying recipes were very basic, but teh pot roast did call
    for beef cubes. I really didn't do too much looking on line, just the
    breakfast cereals. I am going to try this one tonight, minus the dried
    fruit:

    Ingredients:
    8 cups water
    2 cups steel-cut oats (not instant or regular rolled oats)
    1/3 cup dried cranberries
    1/3 cup dried apricots, chopped
    1/4 teaspoon salt or to taste

    Directions:
    Combine water, oats, dried cranberries, dried apricots and salt in 5-
    or 6-quart slow cooker. Turn heat to low. Cover. Cook for 7 to 8 hours,
    or until oats are tender and creamy.

    http://crockpot.cdkitchen.com
    ---

    I really don't like that last instruction, if anyone is thinking I'm
    going to turn it back on early in the AM if it needs more cooking
    they're nutz. I will set it for 8 hours, it better be cooked... if not
    I have left over Chinese take out for breakfast back up.

    Thanks all for your help.

    Sheldon

  18. Sheldon said:


    The accompanying recipes were very basic, but teh pot roast did call
    for beef cubes. I really didn't do too much looking on line, just the
    breakfast cereals. I am going to try this one tonight, minus the dried
    fruit:

    Ingredients:
    8 cups water
    2 cups steel-cut oats (not instant or regular rolled oats)
    1/3 cup dried cranberries
    1/3 cup dried apricots, chopped
    1/4 teaspoon salt or to taste

    Directions:
    Combine water, oats, dried cranberries, dried apricots and salt in 5-
    or 6-quart slow cooker. Turn heat to low. Cover. Cook for 7 to 8 hours,
    or until oats are tender and creamy.

    http://crockpot.cdkitchen.com
    ---

    It's cooking now!

    Sheldon

  19. On 17 Feb 2006 14:47:59 -0800, "Sheldon" <[email hidden]> wrote:

    Helpful hint:

    Whatever the heck it is you are cooking, I'd recommend that you set
    the crock pot either on your stove or on a heat pad/cutting board of
    some kind.

    My crock pot caused a darkish discoloration on my counter after being
    left there for a day.

    Jo Anne

  20. Sheldon said:


    Sheldon said:


    The accompanying recipes were very basic, but teh pot roast did call
    for beef cubes. I really didn't do too much looking on line, just the
    breakfast cereals. I am going to try this one tonight, minus the dried
    fruit:

    Ingredients:
    8 cups water
    2 cups steel-cut oats (not instant or regular rolled oats)
    1/3 cup dried cranberries
    1/3 cup dried apricots, chopped
    1/4 teaspoon salt or to taste

    Directions:
    Combine water, oats, dried cranberries, dried apricots and salt in 5-
    or 6-quart slow cooker. Turn heat to low. Cover. Cook for 7 to 8 hours,
    or until oats are tender and creamy.

    http://crockpot.cdkitchen.com
    ---

    It's cooking now!

    Sheldon

    Do the new crockpots have a shut-off timer?....if so I think I'll
    get a new one....Thanks....Sharon

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.