Australia and New Zealand · Public discussion

Article on bike weight

Started by dtmeister · · Last activity · 8 posts · 666 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Australia and New Zealand
Published
22 March 2006
Last activity
27 March 2006
Original author
dtmeister
Posts
8
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
666
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–8 of 8
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. http://www.torelli.com/tech/weight.shtml

    --
    ..dt

  2. dtmeister said:

    http://www.torelli.com/tech/weight.shtml

    Quoted message said:

    Everyone talks about bicycle weight. It consumes our discussions.
    Magazine reviews make it clear that if the very lightest parts are not chosen,
    if it is not as light as possible, the bicycle being examined is suspect.

    Well, that's [censored], for starters. Every review I've seen considers
    weight as just one of the factors that indicate whether the price is
    fair for a bike's target market. It's the sort of paranoid twaddle that
    only steel lovers would write.

    Quoted message said:

    But, most weight conscious people aren't bringing their bikes down to 15
    pounds because down at that weight, the handling gets very sketchy.

    It does? When climbing at 20 km/h? :-)

    --
    Home page: http://members.westnet.com.au/mvw

  3. dtmeister said:

    http://www.torelli.com/tech/weight.shtml

    Bah, whinging from some poor bugger who can't afford a light bike :-)

    My race bike is about 13kg ATM. My play bike is 17kg. I'm not looking to
    lose any weight, because it'll be at the expense of durability, and I'm
    hard on bikes.

    --
    Dave Hughes | [email hidden]
    Strange things are afoot at the Circle-K.

  4. In aus.bicycle on Wed, 22 Mar 2006 21:43:37 +1100

    Random Data said:
    dtmeister said:

    http://www.torelli.com/tech/weight.shtml

    Bah, whinging from some poor bugger who can't afford a light bike :-)

    My race bike is about 13kg ATM. My play bike is 17kg. I'm not looking to
    lose any weight, because it'll be at the expense of durability, and I'm
    hard on bikes.

    Wow, the bent's not as heavy as I thought it was then! Quoted weight
    is 30lb without rack or lights, which is 13kg.

    Damn, there goes another excuse.

    Zebee

  5. Zebee Johnstone said:

    Wow, the bent's not as heavy as I thought it was then! Quoted weight is
    30lb without rack or lights, which is 13kg.

    Those weights were for mountain bikes, so they're supposed to be somewhat
    stronger. 13kg isn't that bad though.

    --
    Dave Hughes | [email hidden]
    If you can do a job with power tools, then
    that's the right way to do it. - Joe Zeff

  6. Michael Warner said:

    It does? When climbing at 20 km/h? :-)

    Yeah, but then you've got to go downhill ;-)
    --
    Cheers | ~~ __@
    Euan | ~~ _-\<,
    Melbourne, Australia | ~ (*)/ (*)

  7. Euan said:
    Michael Warner said:

    It does? When climbing at 20 km/h? :-)

    Yeah, but then you've got to go downhill ;-)

    Not if you're climbing one of those Escher hills....

    Travis

  8. Travis said:


    Euan said:
    Michael Warner said:

    It does? When climbing at 20 km/h? :-)

    Yeah, but then you've got to go downhill ;-)

    Not if you're climbing one of those Escher hills....

    Eeek, my worst nightmare! Although if you do it in reverse, does that
    mean you never stop going downhill? Cool...

    Tam

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.