rec.sport.unicycling · Public discussion

Pondering on a Schlumpf - questions

Started by gkmac · · Last activity · 26 posts · 448 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
rec.sport.unicycling
Published
5 April 2006
Last activity
8 April 2006
Original author
gkmac
Posts
26
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
448
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 26
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. There's a distinct possibility of me breaking my new years resolution of
    buying another unicycle. I bought a 24" muni last year, a 6ft giraffe
    the year before, and a 20" freestyle in 2003.

    I think my next venture will be some kind of 29er for long pavements
    and roads, and let's be honest... I want to go for broke and get a
    Schlumf geared uni.

    First question (possibly stupid): is it possible to idle and ride it
    backwards? I'm thinking if I need to idle it in case of sudden
    obstructions ahead, somehow my mind says it may not be possible with
    geared mechanisms.

    Second question: as seen in 'this picture' (http://tinyurl.com/fqtbr)
    the hub clearly says "please read instructions carefully, especially
    for off-road and free-riding". What exactly are the issues when it
    comes to off-road riding? Smooth-ish gravel tracks will be the roughest
    terrain I plan to ride it on, so I'm more curious that worried.

    Third question: what size cranks do you recommend? I'm so used to the
    150mm cranks on my 24" muni that the 127mm ones on my freestyle feel so
    twiddly and small for my extra long legs (34"-35" inseam). I was
    thinking about 140mm but that doesn't seem to be an option on
    unicycle.uk.com, so it's gonna have to be 127mm or 152mm...

    --
    gkmac

    "It's a marvellous thing to see, someone in full flight on the
    unicycle." - Stuart Maconie, Radio 2
    "Oh no! Both my toes have gone numb!" - Joe Hodges
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    gkmac's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/4577
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/48304

  2. I'd wait for the splined version coming out later this year.

    --
    pdc

    "What doesn't kill you strengthens you, what kills you strengthens your
    mother"
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    pdc's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/8160
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/48304

  3. pdc said:

    I'd wait for the splined version coming out later this year.

    Hmm, I just knew somebody was going to say that!

    Yes I am aware that Kris Holm Unicycles has joined up with Florian to
    make a splined geared Muni (I've read the Moab threads) which could be
    available in 29er size as well.

    However, this is a long pavement/road machine that I have in mind
    (nothing extreme) so the current Schlumpf will do just fine for me.

    --
    gkmac

    "It's a marvellous thing to see, someone in full flight on the
    unicycle." - Stuart Maconie, Radio 2
    "Oh no! Both my toes have gone numb!" - Joe Hodges
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    gkmac's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/4577
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/48304

  4. gkmac said:

    First question (possibly stupid): is it possible to idle and ride it
    backwards? I'm thinking if I need to idle it in case of sudden
    obstructions ahead, somehow my mind says it may not be possible with
    geared mechanisms.

    You can do all that and anything else you could do on a non-geared uni.
    There will just be a little backlash that you may feel.

    gkmac said:

    Second question: as seen in 'this picture' (http://tinyurl.com/fqtbr)
    the hub clearly says "please read instructions carefully, especially
    for off-road and free-riding". What exactly are the issues when it
    comes to off-road riding? Smooth-ish gravel tracks will be the roughest
    terrain I plan to ride it on, so I'm more curious that worried.

    I can find the manual, but I think it just spells out that it's not a
    muni. On the Laos Unitour, Florian mentioned (jokingly?) it's not
    warrentied for any drop larger than 3 meters as we were looking down a
    cliff.

    gkmac said:

    Third question: what size cranks do you recommend? I'm so used to the
    150mm cranks on my 24" muni that the 127mm ones on my freestyle feel so
    twiddly and small for my extra long legs (34"-35" inseam). I was
    thinking about 140mm but that doesn't seem to be an option on
    unicycle.uk.com, so it's gonna have to be 127mm or 152mm...

    I have 125 mm cranks and they are the best for long distance in my
    opinion. But this is not an opinion shared by all. On the Laos tour,
    only Ken Looi and I had cranks this short. I think most others had
    somewhere around 165mm. So, I'd recommend going with as short of cranks
    that you are comfortable riding with. You can start longer and change
    them to shorter once you get proficient at riding the uni.

    And no, you don't have to wait for the splined one if you are doing
    long distance riding or communting.

    --
    Gilby
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Gilby's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/1
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/48304

  5. gkmac said:

    I want to go for broke and get a Schlumf geared uni.

    Is that a reference to its price? It's not that much, really -- a lot
    cheaper than taking public transportation or driving (and paying for
    petrol and parking). That's my excuse!

    Quoted message said:

    First question (possibly stupid): is it possible to idle and ride it
    backwards? I'm thinking if I need to idle it in case of sudden
    obstructions ahead, somehow my mind says it may not be possible with
    geared mechanisms.

    There are no stupid questions, only stupid people who ask questions
    that everyone else knows the answer to.

    Kidding aside, yes, you can ride it just as a regular uni. Proviso: In
    high gear, it's really hard to ride backwards or to idle. Since you
    mention that you're not going to be 'off-roading' a lot, I'd go for the
    less expensive guni that's available now rather than waiting for the
    uber-hub coming out this summer. But if you foresee lots of curbs
    (kerbs, I mean) in your future, or other slight drops, perhaps it'd be
    best to wait.

    Quoted message said:

    Third question: what size cranks do you recommend? I'm so used to the
    150mm cranks on my 24" muni that the 127mm ones on my freestyle feel so
    twiddly and small for my extra long legs (34"-35" inseam). I was
    thinking about 140mm but that doesn't seem to be an option on
    unicycle.uk.com, so it's gonna have to be 127mm or 152mm...

    It depends on your skill. If you are a really good rider, you could get
    used to the speedier 127s. I am glad I have them. If your riding will
    include lots of stoplights and other slowdowns, I'd consider longer
    cranks. Also, if you don't like going fast, definitely get the 152s for
    the greater control. If you are used to going quickly, get the smaller
    cranks. It's going to take you quite some time to feel comfortable
    riding in high gear on 127s, but for me it was worth it.

    If you have lots of uphills in your future, either get the 127s and
    plan to downshift a lot, or get the 152s and leave it in high gear when
    possible.

    --
    David_Stone

    Dictator for Life,
    NYUC

    Check out my blog (or else):
    http://newyorkunicycle.blogspot.com/
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    David_Stone's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/3834
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/48304

  6. gkmac said:

    picture[/URL] the hub clearly says "please read instructions carefully,
    especially for off-road and free-riding". What exactly are the issues
    when it comes to off-road riding? Smooth-ish gravel tracks will be the
    roughest terrain I plan to ride it on, so I'm more curious that
    worried.

    The hub says that on it, but the instructions don't say anything about
    off road and free-riding. Roger sold mine to me for using in a mountain
    bike race (xc, without drops), so I guess it's okay as long as you're
    not doing drops.

    They do sell 140mm cranks for it according to schlumpf.ch, so I'm sure
    Roger from unicycle.com can get hold of them.

    I've got one, and I'd say that it really might be worth waiting for the
    KH one. Not because of the hub, you probably don't need a splined hub
    for what you're talking about, but for the frame. I think the new hub
    comes with a cunning torque lever attachment so that you can use a
    standard and well tested KH frame, rather than having to use the
    Schlumpf frame.

    From the brief amount of riding I've been able to do on it, I'm happy
    with the hub, but the frame was poo. It broke after five hours riding.
    Snapped through. According to Schlumpf, I think it's because the
    instructions didn't tell you that you need to torque up the 8 bolts to
    adjust the seatpost exactly right or something. In the case that you
    don't, the very thin braces holding the seatpost can snap right
    through. I'd not trust it for any long ride, unless you ride with a
    support crew, you really need to be confident that you're not going to
    be left unable to ride 50 miles away from home, that could be one
    expensive taxi ride.

    Even without that, the frame is rubbish for several reasons. Firstly,
    there are 8 bolts you need to undo to adjust the seatpost. Which all
    have to be tightened up exactly right or else it'll spontaneously snap
    after a few hours riding. Secondly it's a very tall frame, I'm normal
    sized (5ft 10) and I was hitting the frame sometimes on mounts, it's
    about 4 inches taller than a Nimbus 29" frame. I'm currently still
    waiting for a replacement frame, which hopefully will be different to
    avoid these issues, but I've not been able to ride mine for about four
    months now.

    From my riding, it's easy to idle in slow mode and okay in fast mode,
    kind of like idling a coker, except with a little bit of backlash each
    time you idle, kind of like when the cranks are loose on a normal uni.
    You can ride it backwards just fine.

    Cranks wise, I'd suggest start off with something like 150s, if you're
    not used to riding a big wheel with short cranks already.

    Joe

    --
    joemarshall

    my pics http://gallery.unicyclist.com/albuq44
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    joemarshall's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/1545
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/48304

  7. joemarshall said:

    I'd not trust it for any long ride, unless you ride with a support crew,
    you really need to be confident that you're not going to be left unable
    to ride 50 miles away from home, that could be one expensive taxi ride.

    I never knew that. My frame came direct from Florian, assembled minus
    the pedals. The post included was too long and had to be cut down, but
    afterwards I was good to go. I have ridden 650 miles so far, 90 in one
    day, and have not heard of others having frame problems other than the
    size. I know that many riders on the Laos tour had Schlumpfs including
    Ken Looi, who has also ridden his quite far.

    Quoted message said:

    Even without that, the frame is rubbish for several reasons. Firstly,
    there are 8 bolts you need to undo to adjust the seatpost. Which all
    have to be tightened up exactly right or else it'll spontaneously snap
    after a few hours riding.

    I don't think I follow your meaning. I have a few more bolts than usual
    on the seat itself, but the post goes into the frame and is held there
    by a round sleeve with two bolts. Loosen those, and you can move the
    seat post up and down.

    Quoted message said:

    Secondly it's a very tall frame, I'm normal sized (5ft 10) and I was
    hitting the frame sometimes on mounts, it's about 4 inches taller than
    a Nimbus 29" frame. I'm currently still waiting for a replacement
    frame, which hopefully will be different to avoid these issues, but
    I've not been able to ride mine for about four months now.

    Yeah, it's annoying that the frame was so high, but I guess that was in
    order to accomodate certain tire types. It's a drag, tho, that the 1st
    and 2nd generation hubs can only be used with the Schlumpf frame owing
    to the way the hub works.

    --
    David_Stone

    Dictator for Life,
    NYUC

    Check out my blog (or else):
    http://newyorkunicycle.blogspot.com/
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    David_Stone's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/3834
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/48304

  8. David_Stone said:

    I don't think I follow your meaning. I have a few more bolts than usual
    on the seat itself, but the post goes into the frame and is held there
    by a round sleeve with two bolts. Loosen those, and you can move the
    seat post up and down.

    You (and I) have the first generation aluminum frame. There was a
    sourcing/quality issue with these, so Schlumpf made a completely
    different frame, as seen in this photo: [image:
    http://laosunitour.org/images/florians/1.jpg]

    --
    Gilby
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Gilby's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/1
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/48304

  9. Wow, Gilby. Thanks. That design is really different, and I can see why
    someone would be unhappy with it. I also notice that the part that
    holds the hub (at the bottom of the frame) is different, too.

    --
    David_Stone

    Dictator for Life,
    NYUC

    Check out my blog (or else):
    http://newyorkunicycle.blogspot.com/
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    David_Stone's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/3834
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/48304

  10. andytait said:

    I would like to know though, if anyone knows yet, will I be able to buy
    the hub and have it built into a setup I already own?

    Andy

    According to the big thread on the KH geared uni, the hub assembly and
    such will be most of the uni's price, so you might as well buy the
    whole thing and get a cool frame and seat rather than save a couple
    hundred bucks (or pounds).

    --
    unisteve

    -\"i live on the edge. sometimes i fall off.\"-

    la vie est belle...

    harper is my hero.
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    unisteve's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/543
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/48304

  11. gkmac said:

    is it possible to idle and ride it backwards? I'm thinking if I need to
    idle it in case of sudden obstructions ahead, somehow my mind says it
    may not be possible with geared mechanisms.

    I don't own a Schlumpf but I've ridden some, and I can at least respond
    to your first question. When in the geared mode, it will idle or go
    backward similar to a Coker. Which means you *can* idle, but it's
    probably the last thing you would want to do in an urban situation when
    you encounter an obstacle. Of course the smaller wheel will make the
    idle take up a littl less space, but still idling is not necessarily
    the best option on a high-speed uni.

    I never idle or go backwards on my Coker unless I'm specifically trying
    to, and I only do that when I have lots of space. When commuting or
    otherwise Cokering, If something gets in my way I'll either go around,
    or stop. No problem. I guess that's what I would do on a bike anyway.

    --
    johnfoss

    John Foss
    "jfoss" at "unicycling.com" -- www.unicycling.com
    -----------------------------------------------

    "Idiot America—where fact is merely that which enough people believe,
    and truth is measured only by how fervently they believe it." --
    Charles Pierce, in Esquire Magazine
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    johnfoss's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/832
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/48304

  12. This answered a lot of questions for me as well. I can't blame you guys
    for not stress testing your really expensive unis, but if I can't be
    rolling off/hopping up curbs I think I'll wait for the kh hub and be
    able to do what I want with it, peace of mind intact.

    --
    flyer
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    flyer's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/9894
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/48304

  13. My questions were answered, but dilemmas are increasing about the
    square-tapered-Schlumpf-now versus splined-KH/Schlumpf-later.

    There seem to be mixed opinions about the abuse it can take. Some
    people here seem to say that simple kerb-dropping can damage it,
    whereas it seems to be warrantied for drops up to 3 metres and 'Gilby
    hops up stairs' (http://tinyurl.com/lp8g6) with his. I do envisage
    riding down the odd kerb every now and then with whatever I buy.

    But are they talking about breaking the hub, or just the fact that the
    square-tapered cranks would need tightening regularly if kerbs did form
    part of the ride? I did look at 'David Stone's'
    (http://www.unicyclist.com/forums/showthread.php?t=48188) problem with
    his loose crank, and it seems the gear-shift buttons being where the
    crank nuts should be means that the supposedly simple maintenance task
    of tightening cranks becomes bloody complicated.

    I've seen pictures of the frame and I do agree its a bit strange,
    having just two arms holding onto the seatpost instead of it being
    inside a long tube. Being about 6' 2" with a 35" inseam, the height
    isn't a problem for me.

    I started this thread now because if I were to get one now, I'd collect
    it at the British Unicycle Convention which is in about a months time,
    as the prospect of putting something very expensive into the hands of
    people like ParcelForce frightens me.

    But if I were to wait for the splined one, it doesn't seem to be that
    long of a wait. Kris Holm sets a target for "July" or "late summer"...
    for the US I presume. It would take longer than that to reach the UK,
    it would be about halfway between British Unicycle Conventions. $1600
    uni in the hands of people like ParcelForce???

    Decisions decisions...😕

    --
    gkmac

    "It's a marvellous thing to see, someone in full flight on the
    unicycle." - Stuart Maconie, Radio 2
    "Oh no! Both my toes have gone numb!" - Joe Hodges
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    gkmac's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/4577
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/48304

  14. gkmac said:

    But if I were to wait for the splined one, it doesn't seem to be that
    long of a wait. Kris Holm sets a target for "July" or "late summer"...
    for the US I presume.

    Keep in mind that it's been typical for the actual availablity date for
    any new unicycle have taken longer than initially expected. Especially
    when dealing with small companies, both of which have high quality
    standards. If one thing is not right going into production, it could
    mean a few months delay. So, while it'd be great if late summer was
    when they'd be available, I wouldn't bet on it.

    --
    Gilby
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Gilby's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/1
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/48304

  15. johnfoss said:

    Of course the smaller wheel will make the
    idle take up a littl less space

    The amplitude of the movement (the distance that you go to and fro) is
    not so much related to wheel size but to crank position, I think. The
    only reason the idle should take less space is that the smaller wheel
    itself takes less space. However, the virtual wheel diameter of the
    Schlumpf 29'er is about 45", significantly more than a 36" Coker. So
    all in all, idling will probably take MORE space.

    This is all theoretical since I can't idle the Schlumpf in high gear.

  16. OK, next question, aimed at those with experience of Cokers and geared
    unis. I have experience of neither.

    The fact that a coker rolls so nicely is, I presume, mainly due to the
    weight of the wheel in motion (angular momentum I think is the
    technical term) combined with the size of the wheel. So small bumps etc
    get soaked up.

    With a smaller wheel, geared up to an equivalent size, do you get the
    same effect? The wheel weighs less but is rotating faster so the
    momentum could be roughly the same, but the diameter is smaller so
    presumably it won't roll over a bumpy surface quite as well as a large
    wheel.

    Andy

    --
    andytait
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    andytait's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/11766
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/48304

  17. andytait said:

    OK, next question, aimed at those with experience of Cokers and geared
    unis. I have experience of neither.

    The fact that a coker rolls so nicely is, I presume, mainly due to the
    weight of the wheel in motion (angular momentum I think is the
    technical term) combined with the size of the wheel. So small bumps etc
    get soaked up.

    With a smaller wheel, geared up to an equivalent size, do you get the
    same effect? The wheel weighs less but is rotating faster so the
    momentum could be roughly the same, but the diameter is smaller so
    presumably it won't roll over a bumpy surface quite as well as a large
    wheel.

    Andy

    That's exactly right...The Schlumpf takes more concentration to ride,
    as small bumps tend to throw you off more, due to the smaller wheel and
    higher gear.

    Small bumps get soaked up by a Coker (remember also that a Coker tyre
    is HUGE, even if it doesn't look it). But more importantly it rolls
    over small irregularities due to the larger diameter. I reckon if you
    could get a Coker wheel to weigh the same or less than a Schlumpf wheel
    that it will still feel more stable.

    --
    GizmoDuck

    'www.adventureunicyclist.com' (http://www.adventureunicyclist.com/)
    'Laos Unicycle Tour' (http://www.laosunitour.org)
    'New Zealand Unicycle Federation' (http://www.unicycle.org.nz)

    The SINZ Unitour- coming soon......
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    GizmoDuck's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/794
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/48304

  18. GizmoDuck said:

    (remember also that a Coker tyre is HUGE, even if it doesn't look it)

    It looks it

    --
    Brian MacKenzie

    'Training Wheel Not Required DVD - New 6min short as seen on
    www.unicycle.tv' (http://www.LBMmultimedia.com/videos/TWNR_uniTV.wmv)
    All proceeds from TWNR go directly into my next movie due for release
    Sept 1 2006
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Brian MacKenzie's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/7650
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/48304

  19. Brian MacKenzie said:

    It looks it

    😄 What I meant was that it doesn't look as big as something like a
    Gazzoloddi tyre would look on a 26" wheel, but I think it's similar to
    my 26x2.6 Gazz Jnr because it is just as tight a fit on the hooks I use
    to hang the Unicycles up with. I think it's bigger than the Big Apple
    in it's crossection.

    --
    GizmoDuck

    'www.adventureunicyclist.com' (http://www.adventureunicyclist.com/)
    'Laos Unicycle Tour' (http://www.laosunitour.org)
    'New Zealand Unicycle Federation' (http://www.unicycle.org.nz)

    The SINZ Unitour- coming soon......
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    GizmoDuck's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/794
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/48304

  20. gkmac said:

    square-tapered-Schlumpf-now versus splined-KH/Schlumpf-later.

    There seem to be mixed opinions about the abuse it can take. Some
    people here seem to say that simple kerb-dropping can damage it,
    whereas it seems to be warrantied for drops up to 3 metres and 'Gilby
    hops up stairs' (http://tinyurl.com/lp8g6) with his. I do envisage
    riding down the odd kerb every now and then with whatever I buy.

    I thought that you can use any square taper cranks with the Schlumpf
    hub. (Someone correct me if I'm wrong). So this means that its the
    strength of square taper cranks vs splined cranks that you are really
    comparing. Most unicyclists are familiar with the issues here. Square
    taper cranks aren't as strong, but they are certainly strong enough to
    do some hopping on and for a uni that will be ridden largely as a road
    machine, perfectly strong enough. Splined cranks are overkill (and not
    to mention heavier, too) for your purposes. Just get some strong square
    taper cranks and you'll be fine with the standard Schlumpf hub.

    Here's a pic of me jumping over Ken on Florian's 26" Schlumpf
    http://tinyurl.com/f22ts

    --
    TonyMelton

    The way to a man's heart is through his veins.
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    TonyMelton's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/2118
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/48304

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.