I went to the bookstore, yesterday. They had a book on the Paleolithic Diet. And, one attacking grains which didn't bother to tell the public outright that it would be of interest only to those suffering from celiac disease. Most people are not sensitive to gluten. There was nothing by Weston Price promoting a High-Fat diet.
Anyone interested in a NORMAL diet for NORMAL people? -- John Gohde, Achieving good Nutrition is an Art, NOT a Science!
The nutrition of eating a healthy diet is a biological factor of the mind-body connection. Now, weighing in at 18 web pages, the Nutrition of a Healthy Diet is with more documentation and sharper terminology than ever before. http://naturalhealthperspective.com/food/
I went to the bookstore, yesterday. They had a book on the Paleolithic Diet. And, one attacking grains which didn't bother to tell the public outright that it would be of interest only to those suffering from celiac disease. Most people are not sensitive to gluten. There was nothing by Weston Price promoting a High-Fat diet.
Anyone interested in a NORMAL diet for NORMAL people? -- John Gohde, Achieving good Nutrition is an Art, NOT a Science!
The nutrition of eating a healthy diet is a biological factor of the mind-body connection. Now, weighing in at 18 web pages, the Nutrition of a Healthy Diet is with more documentation and sharper terminology than ever before. http://naturalhealthperspective.com/food/
-- Joe W T2 Nov '05 30mg Actos, 3gr(1/2 tsp or 500mg pill) Cinnamon, Diet(>100 carbs) & 30 minute walk(everyday) & BowFlex 3x/week *****Diabetes, be proactive, not reactive.*****
"Mr-Natural-Health" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Anyone interested in a NORMAL diet for NORMAL people?
Most of us are already doing it, it's called low-carb. We don't call it a diet either, diets are for grain-eaters since they need to "CONTROL " how much they eat or they'll get fat.
Quoted message said:
-- John Gohde, Achieving good Nutrition is an Art, NOT a Science!
I went to the bookstore, yesterday. They had a book on the Paleolithic Diet. And, one attacking grains which didn't bother to tell the public outright that it would be of interest only to those suffering from celiac disease. Most people are not sensitive to gluten. There was nothing by Weston Price promoting a High-Fat diet.
Anyone interested in what the NORMAL diet is for people in their ideal weight range? -- John Gohde, Achieving good Nutrition is an Art, NOT a Science!
The nutrition of eating a healthy diet is a biological factor of the mind-body connection. Now, weighing in at 18 web pages, the Nutrition of a Healthy Diet is with more documentation and sharper terminology than ever before. http://naturalhealthperspective.com/food/
On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 18:23:17 -0500, "Marengo" <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:
That was REALLY dishonest -- to edit Cathy's post to make it look as if she said those words. She was of course quoting from one of Gohde's post to illustrate what a slimebag he is. Why would you do such a thing?
Peter
Then why not just post the google groups archive link to the post in question instead of reposting that [censored]. Without the link there is no proof.
Most of us are already doing it, it's called low-carb. We don't call it a diet either, diets are for grain-eaters since they need to "CONTROL " how much they eat or they'll get fat.
-- Joe W T2 Nov '05 30mg Actos, 3gr(1/2 tsp or 500mg pill) Cinnamon, Diet(>100 carbs) & 30 minute walk(everyday) & BowFlex 3x/week *****Diabetes, be proactive, not reactive.*****
"Mr-Natural-Health" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 18:23:17 -0500, "Marengo" <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:
That was REALLY dishonest -- to edit Cathy's post to make it look as if she said those words. She was of course quoting from one of Gohde's post to illustrate what a slimebag he is. Why would you do such a thing?
Peter
Then why not just post the google groups archive link to the post in question instead of reposting that [censored]. Without the link there is no proof.
Correct! Actually, it is called a breach of Google's TOS agreement. And, a report of abuse has been sent. -- john gohde
On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 18:23:17 -0500, "Marengo" <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:
That was REALLY dishonest -- to edit Cathy's post to make it look as if she said those words. She was of course quoting from one of Gohde's post to illustrate what a slimebag he is. Why would you do such a thing?
Peter
Then why not just post the google groups archive link to the post in question instead of reposting that [censored]. Without the link there is no proof.
Correct! Actually, it is called a breach of Google's TOS agreement. And, a report of abuse has been sent.
It is noted that the bigot Gohde does not deny his words. Because he can't:
"Joe" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Most of us are already doing it, it's called low-carb. We don't call it a diet either, diets are for grain-eaters since they need to "CONTROL " how much they eat or they'll get fat.
Those of us who don't control how much fat and protein we eat can also get fat. I'm at the point I've stopped losing weight low-carbing so now will have to cut calories, or the amount I eat. Same difference.
On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 18:23:17 -0500, "Marengo" <[email hidden]> wrote: > >That was REALLY dishonest -- to edit Cathy's post to make it look as if >she said those words. She was of course quoting from one of Gohde's post >to illustrate what a slimebag he is. Why would you do such a thing? > >Peter > Then why not just post the google groups archive link to the post in question instead of reposting that [censored]. Without the link there is no proof.
Correct! Actually, it is called a breach of Google's TOS agreement. And, a report of abuse has been sent.
It is noted that the bigot Gohde does not deny his words. Because he can't:
jt wrote: > On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 18:23:17 -0500, "Marengo" <[email hidden]> > wrote: > > > >That was REALLY dishonest -- to edit Cathy's post to make it look as if > >she said those words. She was of course quoting from one of Gohde's post > >to illustrate what a slimebag he is. Why would you do such a thing? > > > >Peter > > > Then why not just post the google groups archive link to the post in > question instead of reposting that [censored]. Without the link there is no > proof.
Correct! Actually, it is called a breach of Google's TOS agreement. And, a report of abuse has been sent.
It is noted that the bigot Gohde does not deny his words. Because he can't:
Are you also going tom go to the French and German editions, too?
Why, have you been a racist slime there as well?
Quoted message said:
Go ahead. I will report your abusive behavior again and again and again. -- john gohde
This is too funny. Gohde, who abuses people who don't have the same skin colour as him, in the foulest of language and repeatedly, finds it abusive that someone would quote him, or link to his posts!
Mr-Natural-Health wrote: > jt wrote: > > On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 18:23:17 -0500, "Marengo" <[email hidden]> > > wrote: > > > > > >That was REALLY dishonest -- to edit Cathy's post to make it look as if > > >she said those words. She was of course quoting from one of Gohde's post > > >to illustrate what a slimebag he is. Why would you do such a thing? > > > > > >Peter > > > > > Then why not just post the google groups archive link to the post in > > question instead of reposting that [censored]. Without the link there is no > > proof. > > Correct! Actually, it is called a breach of Google's TOS agreement. > And, a report of abuse has been sent.
It is noted that the bigot Gohde does not deny his words. Because he can't:
Are you also going tom go to the French and German editions, too?
Why, have you been a racist slime there as well?
Quoted message said:
Go ahead. I will report your abusive behavior again and again and again. -- john gohde
This is too funny. Gohde, who abuses people who don't have the same skin colour as him, in the foulest of language and repeatedly, finds it abusive that someone would quote him, or link to his posts!
>On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 18:23:17 -0500, "Marengo" <[email hidden]> >wrote: > >>That was REALLY dishonest -- to edit Cathy's post to make it look as if >>she said those words. She was of course quoting from one of Gohde's post >>to illustrate what a slimebag he is. Why would you do such a thing? >> >>Peter >> > >Then why not just post the google groups archive link to the post in >question instead of reposting that [censored]. Without the link there is no >proof.
Correct! Actually, it is called a breach of Google's TOS agreement. And, a report of abuse has been sent.
It is noted that the bigot Gohde does not deny his words. Because he can't:
Mr-Natural-Health wrote: > jt wrote: > > On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 18:23:17 -0500, "Marengo" <[email hidden]> > > wrote: > > > > > >That was REALLY dishonest -- to edit Cathy's post to make it look as if > > >she said those words. She was of course quoting from one of Gohde's post > > >to illustrate what a slimebag he is. Why would you do such a thing? > > > > > >Peter > > > > > Then why not just post the google groups archive link to the post in > > question instead of reposting that [censored]. Without the link there is no > > proof. > > Correct! Actually, it is called a breach of Google's TOS agreement. > And, a report of abuse has been sent.
It is noted that the bigot Gohde does not deny his words. Because he can't:
Who cares? I certainly don't. When I remove a post from Google, I expect it to be removed. Obviously, that is not the case.
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Are you also going tom go to the French and German editions, too?
Why, have you been a racist slime there as well?
Quoted message said:
Go ahead. I will report your abusive behavior again and again and again. -- john gohde
This is too funny. Gohde, who abuses people who don't have the same skin colour as him, in the foulest of language and repeatedly, finds it abusive that someone would quote him, or link to his posts!
Being you do NOT live in the USA, you obviously do NOT have first hand knowledge of the Black problem in America. Whereas, I obviously do. You were harassing me back then. And, you are harassing me now.
cathyb wrote: > Mr-Natural-Health wrote: > > jt wrote: > > > On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 18:23:17 -0500, "Marengo" <[email hidden]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >That was REALLY dishonest -- to edit Cathy's post to make it look as if > > > >she said those words. She was of course quoting from one of Gohde's post > > > >to illustrate what a slimebag he is. Why would you do such a thing? > > > > > > > >Peter > > > > > > > Then why not just post the google groups archive link to the post in > > > question instead of reposting that [censored]. Without the link there is no > > > proof. > > > > Correct! Actually, it is called a breach of Google's TOS agreement. > > And, a report of abuse has been sent. > > It is noted that the bigot Gohde does not deny his words. Because he > can't: > > http://groups.google.com.au/group/misc.health.alternative/msg/12b80b945c4e8577?hl=en&
This abusive message has been reported.
Notice how she had to go the Australian edition.
It's where I post from. Idiot.
Quoted message said:
Are you also going tom go to the French and German editions, too?
Why, have you been a racist slime there as well?
Quoted message said:
Go ahead. I will report your abusive behavior again and again and again. -- john gohde
This is too funny. Gohde, who abuses people who don't have the same skin colour as him, in the foulest of language and repeatedly, finds it abusive that someone would quote him, or link to his posts!
cathyb wrote: > Mr-Natural-Health wrote: > > jt wrote: > > > On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 18:23:17 -0500, "Marengo" <[email hidden]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >That was REALLY dishonest -- to edit Cathy's post to make it look as if > > > >she said those words. She was of course quoting from one of Gohde's post > > > >to illustrate what a slimebag he is. Why would you do such a thing? > > > > > > > >Peter > > > > > > > Then why not just post the google groups archive link to the post in > > > question instead of reposting that [censored]. Without the link there is no > > > proof. > > > > Correct! Actually, it is called a breach of Google's TOS agreement. > > And, a report of abuse has been sent. > > It is noted that the bigot Gohde does not deny his words. Because he > can't: > > http://groups.google.com.au/group/misc.health.alternative/msg/12b80b945c4e8577?hl=en&
This abusive message has been reported.
Notice how she had to go the Australian edition.
It's where I post from. Idiot.
Who cares? I certainly don't. When I remove a post from Google, I expect it to be removed. Obviously, that is not the case.
Oh, I am sorry. Had you planned to deny that the vile sentiments were yours?
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Are you also going tom go to the French and German editions, too?
Why, have you been a racist slime there as well?
Quoted message said:
Go ahead. I will report your abusive behavior again and again and again. -- john gohde
This is too funny. Gohde, who abuses people who don't have the same skin colour as him, in the foulest of language and repeatedly, finds it abusive that someone would quote him, or link to his posts!
Being you do NOT live in the USA, you obviously do NOT have first hand knowledge of the Black problem in America. Whereas, I obviously do. You were harassing me back then. And, you are harassing me now.
Gohde, your racism is disgusting, and I am just telling people about it. Your accusation of harrassment is laughable given your own behaviour, and also the fact that I have done nothing other than quote you directly, and link to your posts.
If you didn't want people to know your vile views, you should've kept them to yourself.
[email hidden] wrote: > cathyb wrote: > > Mr-Natural-Health wrote: > > > jt wrote: > > > > On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 18:23:17 -0500, "Marengo" <[email hidden]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >That was REALLY dishonest -- to edit Cathy's post to make it look as if > > > > >she said those words. She was of course quoting from one of Gohde's post > > > > >to illustrate what a slimebag he is. Why would you do such a thing? > > > > > > > > > >Peter > > > > > > > > > Then why not just post the google groups archive link to the post in > > > > question instead of reposting that [censored]. Without the link there is no > > > > proof. > > > > > > Correct! Actually, it is called a breach of Google's TOS agreement. > > > And, a report of abuse has been sent. > > > > It is noted that the bigot Gohde does not deny his words. Because he > > can't: > > > > http://groups.google.com.au/group/misc.health.alternative/msg/12b80b945c4e8577?hl=en& > > This abusive message has been reported. > > Notice how she had to go the Australian edition.
It's where I post from. Idiot.
Who cares? I certainly don't. When I remove a post from Google, I expect it to be removed. Obviously, that is not the case.
Oh, I am sorry. Had you planned to deny that the vile sentiments were yours?
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
> Are you also going > tom go to the French and German editions, too?
Why, have you been a racist slime there as well?
> > Go ahead. I will report your abusive behavior again and again and > again. > -- > john gohde
This is too funny. Gohde, who abuses people who don't have the same skin colour as him, in the foulest of language and repeatedly, finds it abusive that someone would quote him, or link to his posts!
Being you do NOT live in the USA, you obviously do NOT have first hand knowledge of the Black problem in America. Whereas, I obviously do. You were harassing me back then. And, you are harassing me now.
Gohde, your racism is disgusting, and I am just telling people about it. Your accusation of harrassment is laughable given your own behaviour, and also the fact that I have done nothing other than quote you directly, and link to your posts.
If you didn't want people to know your vile views, you should've kept them to yourself.
You are in violation of Google's TOS agreement because you have harassed me with the same garbage since Sept 2005. You were harassing me then. You are harassing me, now.
The ONLY difference is that NOW I am reporting abuse in Both Editions of Google.
I have a right to start a new thread without you posting the same identical reply. Nobody wants to read your [censored]. And, that includes me.
